GeneXpert 在非洲三个结核病高发国家的推广:2001 年至 2019 年肺结核诊断和结果回顾。

IF 1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2022-08-30 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1811
Victor Williams, Marianne Calnan, Bassey Edem, Chukwuemeka Onwuchekwa, Chika Okoro, Christine Candari, Rhodora Cruz, Kennedy Otwombe
{"title":"GeneXpert 在非洲三个结核病高发国家的推广:2001 年至 2019 年肺结核诊断和结果回顾。","authors":"Victor Williams, Marianne Calnan, Bassey Edem, Chukwuemeka Onwuchekwa, Chika Okoro, Christine Candari, Rhodora Cruz, Kennedy Otwombe","doi":"10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rollout of GeneXpert aimed at increasing early diagnosis of tuberculosis to improve treatment outcomes and global tuberculosis targets.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated trends in tuberculosis diagnosis and outcomes pre- and post-introduction of GeneXpert in three African countries - the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Nigeria and South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 2001 to 2019 were extracted from the World Health Organization's data repository. Descriptive analysis, paired <i>t</i>-tests and interrupted time series models were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Estimated tuberculosis incidence decreased from 327/100 000 to 324/100 000 in the DRC, and from 1220/100 000 to 988/100 000 in South Africa. Incidence remained at 219/100 000 in Nigeria. The tuberculosis case notification rate did not change significantly. Increases in the new case treatment success rates were statistically significant (DRC: <i>p</i> = 0.0201; Nigeria: <i>p</i> = 0.0001; South Africa: <i>p</i> = 0.0017); decreases in mortality were also statistically significant (DRC: <i>p</i> = 0.0264; Nigeria: <i>p</i> = 0.0001; South Africa: <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Time series models showed insignificant increases in new tuberculosis cases in DRC (<i>n</i> = 1856, <i>p</i> = 0.085) and Nigeria (<i>n</i> = 785, <i>p</i> = 0.555) from 2011 to 2019; and a statistically significant decrease in South Africa (<i>n</i> = 15 269, <i>p</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improvements in tuberculosis treatment outcomes were achieved, but little progress has been made in new case notification due to varied implementation and scale-up of GeneXpert across the three countries. Implementation barriers need to be addressed to achieve the required tuberculosis targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":45412,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GeneXpert rollout in three high-burden tuberculosis countries in Africa: A review of pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis and outcomes from 2001 to 2019.\",\"authors\":\"Victor Williams, Marianne Calnan, Bassey Edem, Chukwuemeka Onwuchekwa, Chika Okoro, Christine Candari, Rhodora Cruz, Kennedy Otwombe\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rollout of GeneXpert aimed at increasing early diagnosis of tuberculosis to improve treatment outcomes and global tuberculosis targets.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated trends in tuberculosis diagnosis and outcomes pre- and post-introduction of GeneXpert in three African countries - the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Nigeria and South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 2001 to 2019 were extracted from the World Health Organization's data repository. Descriptive analysis, paired <i>t</i>-tests and interrupted time series models were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Estimated tuberculosis incidence decreased from 327/100 000 to 324/100 000 in the DRC, and from 1220/100 000 to 988/100 000 in South Africa. Incidence remained at 219/100 000 in Nigeria. The tuberculosis case notification rate did not change significantly. Increases in the new case treatment success rates were statistically significant (DRC: <i>p</i> = 0.0201; Nigeria: <i>p</i> = 0.0001; South Africa: <i>p</i> = 0.0017); decreases in mortality were also statistically significant (DRC: <i>p</i> = 0.0264; Nigeria: <i>p</i> = 0.0001; South Africa: <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Time series models showed insignificant increases in new tuberculosis cases in DRC (<i>n</i> = 1856, <i>p</i> = 0.085) and Nigeria (<i>n</i> = 785, <i>p</i> = 0.555) from 2011 to 2019; and a statistically significant decrease in South Africa (<i>n</i> = 15 269, <i>p</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improvements in tuberculosis treatment outcomes were achieved, but little progress has been made in new case notification due to varied implementation and scale-up of GeneXpert across the three countries. Implementation barriers need to be addressed to achieve the required tuberculosis targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453189/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1811\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:GeneXpert 的推广旨在提高结核病的早期诊断率,改善治疗效果和全球结核病防治目标:基因Xpert的推广旨在提高结核病的早期诊断率,从而改善治疗效果,实现全球结核病防治目标:本研究评估了在刚果民主共和国(DRC)、尼日利亚和南非这三个非洲国家引入 GeneXpert 前后结核病诊断和治疗结果的趋势:从世界卫生组织的数据储存库中提取了 2001 年至 2019 年的数据。采用了描述性分析、配对 t 检验和间断时间序列模型:刚果(金)的结核病估计发病率从 327/100 000 降至 324/100 000,南非的结核病估计发病率从 1220/100 000 降至 988/100 000。尼日利亚的发病率仍为 219/100000。结核病病例通报率没有显著变化。新病例治疗成功率的增加在统计学上有意义(刚果民主共和国:p = 0.0201;尼日利亚:p = 0.0001;南非:p = 0.0017);死亡率的下降在统计学上也有意义(刚果民主共和国:p = 0.0264;尼日利亚:p = 0.0001;南非:p < 0.0001)。时间序列模型显示,从 2011 年到 2019 年,刚果民主共和国(n = 1856,p = 0.085)和尼日利亚(n = 785,p = 0.555)的结核病新发病例增加不明显;而南非(n = 15 269,p = 0.006)的结核病新发病例减少具有统计学意义:结论:结核病治疗结果有所改善,但由于这三个国家在实施和推广 GeneXpert 方面存在差异,因此在新病例通报方面进展甚微。要实现所要求的结核病目标,需要解决实施障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

GeneXpert rollout in three high-burden tuberculosis countries in Africa: A review of pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis and outcomes from 2001 to 2019.

GeneXpert rollout in three high-burden tuberculosis countries in Africa: A review of pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis and outcomes from 2001 to 2019.

GeneXpert rollout in three high-burden tuberculosis countries in Africa: A review of pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis and outcomes from 2001 to 2019.

GeneXpert rollout in three high-burden tuberculosis countries in Africa: A review of pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis and outcomes from 2001 to 2019.

Background: The rollout of GeneXpert aimed at increasing early diagnosis of tuberculosis to improve treatment outcomes and global tuberculosis targets.

Objective: This study evaluated trends in tuberculosis diagnosis and outcomes pre- and post-introduction of GeneXpert in three African countries - the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Nigeria and South Africa.

Methods: Data from 2001 to 2019 were extracted from the World Health Organization's data repository. Descriptive analysis, paired t-tests and interrupted time series models were used.

Results: Estimated tuberculosis incidence decreased from 327/100 000 to 324/100 000 in the DRC, and from 1220/100 000 to 988/100 000 in South Africa. Incidence remained at 219/100 000 in Nigeria. The tuberculosis case notification rate did not change significantly. Increases in the new case treatment success rates were statistically significant (DRC: p = 0.0201; Nigeria: p = 0.0001; South Africa: p = 0.0017); decreases in mortality were also statistically significant (DRC: p = 0.0264; Nigeria: p = 0.0001; South Africa: p < 0.0001). Time series models showed insignificant increases in new tuberculosis cases in DRC (n = 1856, p = 0.085) and Nigeria (n = 785, p = 0.555) from 2011 to 2019; and a statistically significant decrease in South Africa (n = 15 269, p = 0.006).

Conclusion: Improvements in tuberculosis treatment outcomes were achieved, but little progress has been made in new case notification due to varied implementation and scale-up of GeneXpert across the three countries. Implementation barriers need to be addressed to achieve the required tuberculosis targets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, the official journal of ASLM, focuses on the role of the laboratory and its professionals in the clinical and public healthcare sectors,and is specifically based on an African frame of reference. Emphasis is on all aspects that promote and contribute to the laboratory medicine practices of Africa. This includes, amongst others: laboratories, biomedical scientists and clinicians, medical community, public health officials and policy makers, laboratory systems and policies (translation of laboratory knowledge, practices and technologies in clinical care), interfaces of laboratory with medical science, laboratory-based epidemiology, laboratory investigations, evidence-based effectiveness in real world (actual) settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信