游离浓度与结合浓度:从聚合物网格中被动加药:阐明底栖无脊椎动物水生试验中的毒性驱动因素

IF 3.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Fabian C. Fischer, Kyoshiro Hiki, Satoshi Endo
{"title":"游离浓度与结合浓度:从聚合物网格中被动加药:阐明底栖无脊椎动物水生试验中的毒性驱动因素","authors":"Fabian C. Fischer,&nbsp;Kyoshiro Hiki,&nbsp;Satoshi Endo","doi":"10.1002/etc.5473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aquatic toxicity tests with benthic organisms are used to predict the toxicity of hydrophobic organic chemicals (HOCs) in sediments, assuming that the freely dissolved concentration (<i>C</i><sub>free</sub>) is a good surrogate of bioavailability in the exposure system. However, <i>C</i><sub>free</sub> of HOCs is difficult to control in water-only setups. Moreover, the role of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the occurrence of toxicity needs clarification because DOC concentrations in sediment porewater can be substantially higher than in typical test water. We introduced biocompatible polyethylene meshes with high sorptive capacities and fast release kinetics as a novel passive dosing phase, which maintained <i>C</i><sub>free</sub> and <i>C</i><sub>water</sub> (i.e., free + DOC-bound) in <i>Hyalella azteca</i> water-only tests. Adding the supernatant fraction of peat to test water as a DOC source increased <i>C</i><sub>water</sub> to an extent comparable to sediment porewater and significantly increased and decreased the observed toxicity of permethrin and benzo[<i>a</i>]pyrene, respectively, to <i>H. azteca</i>. This result indicates that DOC can both benefit and harm test species likely due to the increased health after ingestion of DOC and to the uptake of DOC-bound HOCs, respectively. Passive dosing in combination with the addition of sediment DOC surrogates may better reflect exposure and habitat conditions in sediment porewater than conventional aquatic tests. <i>Environ Toxicol Chem</i> 2024;43:1747–1756. © 2022 The Authors. <i>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</i> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/etc.5473","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Free Versus Bound Concentration: Passive Dosing from Polymer Meshes Elucidates Drivers of Toxicity in Aquatic Tests with Benthic Invertebrates\",\"authors\":\"Fabian C. Fischer,&nbsp;Kyoshiro Hiki,&nbsp;Satoshi Endo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/etc.5473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Aquatic toxicity tests with benthic organisms are used to predict the toxicity of hydrophobic organic chemicals (HOCs) in sediments, assuming that the freely dissolved concentration (<i>C</i><sub>free</sub>) is a good surrogate of bioavailability in the exposure system. However, <i>C</i><sub>free</sub> of HOCs is difficult to control in water-only setups. Moreover, the role of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the occurrence of toxicity needs clarification because DOC concentrations in sediment porewater can be substantially higher than in typical test water. We introduced biocompatible polyethylene meshes with high sorptive capacities and fast release kinetics as a novel passive dosing phase, which maintained <i>C</i><sub>free</sub> and <i>C</i><sub>water</sub> (i.e., free + DOC-bound) in <i>Hyalella azteca</i> water-only tests. Adding the supernatant fraction of peat to test water as a DOC source increased <i>C</i><sub>water</sub> to an extent comparable to sediment porewater and significantly increased and decreased the observed toxicity of permethrin and benzo[<i>a</i>]pyrene, respectively, to <i>H. azteca</i>. This result indicates that DOC can both benefit and harm test species likely due to the increased health after ingestion of DOC and to the uptake of DOC-bound HOCs, respectively. Passive dosing in combination with the addition of sediment DOC surrogates may better reflect exposure and habitat conditions in sediment porewater than conventional aquatic tests. <i>Environ Toxicol Chem</i> 2024;43:1747–1756. © 2022 The Authors. <i>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</i> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/etc.5473\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5473\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

底栖生物水生毒性试验用于预测沉积物中疏水性有机化学品(HOCs)的毒性,假定自由溶解浓度(Cfree)是暴露系统中生物利用率的良好替代物。然而,在纯水环境中很难控制 HOC 的 Cfree。此外,由于沉积物孔隙水中的溶解有机碳(DOC)浓度可能远高于典型的测试水,因此需要明确溶解有机碳(DOC)在毒性发生过程中的作用。我们引入了具有高吸附能力和快速释放动力学的生物相容性聚乙烯网,作为一种新型的被动加药阶段,在只含水的 Hyalella azteca 试验中维持 Cfree 和 Cwater(即游离+DOC 结合)。将泥炭的上清液部分作为 DOC 源添加到测试水中,可使 Cwater 的增加程度与沉积物孔隙水相当,并可分别显著增加和减少氯菊酯和苯并[a]芘对 H. azteca 的毒性。这一结果表明,DOC 对测试物种既有利又有害,这可能分别是由于摄入 DOC 后健康状况的改善以及摄入 DOC 结合的 HOCs 的缘故。与传统的水生测试相比,被动加药与添加沉积物 DOC 替代物相结合,可以更好地反映沉积物孔隙水中的暴露和生境条件。环境毒物化学 2022;00:1-10。© 2022 作者。环境毒理学与化学》由 Wiley Periodicals LLC 代表 SETAC 出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Free Versus Bound Concentration: Passive Dosing from Polymer Meshes Elucidates Drivers of Toxicity in Aquatic Tests with Benthic Invertebrates

Free Versus Bound Concentration: Passive Dosing from Polymer Meshes Elucidates Drivers of Toxicity in Aquatic Tests with Benthic Invertebrates

Aquatic toxicity tests with benthic organisms are used to predict the toxicity of hydrophobic organic chemicals (HOCs) in sediments, assuming that the freely dissolved concentration (Cfree) is a good surrogate of bioavailability in the exposure system. However, Cfree of HOCs is difficult to control in water-only setups. Moreover, the role of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the occurrence of toxicity needs clarification because DOC concentrations in sediment porewater can be substantially higher than in typical test water. We introduced biocompatible polyethylene meshes with high sorptive capacities and fast release kinetics as a novel passive dosing phase, which maintained Cfree and Cwater (i.e., free + DOC-bound) in Hyalella azteca water-only tests. Adding the supernatant fraction of peat to test water as a DOC source increased Cwater to an extent comparable to sediment porewater and significantly increased and decreased the observed toxicity of permethrin and benzo[a]pyrene, respectively, to H. azteca. This result indicates that DOC can both benefit and harm test species likely due to the increased health after ingestion of DOC and to the uptake of DOC-bound HOCs, respectively. Passive dosing in combination with the addition of sediment DOC surrogates may better reflect exposure and habitat conditions in sediment porewater than conventional aquatic tests. Environ Toxicol Chem 2024;43:1747–1756. © 2022 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信