生物安全专业人员进行操作的工作环境特征:来自生物安全分析倡议调查系列的第一次调查的结果。

IF 0.7
Robert J Emery, Janelle Rios, Zackary B Becker, Brett Haltiwanger, Scott J Patlovich
{"title":"生物安全专业人员进行操作的工作环境特征:来自生物安全分析倡议调查系列的第一次调查的结果。","authors":"Robert J Emery,&nbsp;Janelle Rios,&nbsp;Zackary B Becker,&nbsp;Brett Haltiwanger,&nbsp;Scott J Patlovich","doi":"10.1177/1535676020902614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the endorsement and support of the ABSA International Council and the Prevention, Preparedness and Response (P2R) Academy of The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Public Health, a survey to characterize the work settings in which biosafety professionals operate was conducted. The survey was the first of a planned series of 10 solicitations in support of an overarching \"Biosafety Analytics Initiative,\" the goal of which is to identify commonalities, trends, possible benchmarking opportunities, and professional training needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was developed, tested, and then distributed electronically for a 3-week period between May 29 and June 19, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 228 ABSA International members completed responses (15.6% of total membership). The results of the survey indicate that 59.7% of the total membership respondents conduct operations in the public or private academic setting, but when separated by domestic vs international respondents, 38% of the international respondents operate in government (nonacademic) settings. The bulk of biosafety activities were reported as providing support to BSL-1 and BSL-2 laboratories, with more than 90% of respondents indicating that they support work with risk group 1 and 2 organisms. Approximately 60% of the biosafety programs responding reported being organizationally aligned within institutional Environmental Health & Safety programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this survey serve as a foundation for current and future ABSA International priorities regarding professional development, recruitment, and training opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":520561,"journal":{"name":"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association","volume":" ","pages":"90-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1535676020902614","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of Work Settings in Which Biosafety Professionals Conduct Operations: Results from the First Survey of the Biosafety Analytics Initiative Survey Series.\",\"authors\":\"Robert J Emery,&nbsp;Janelle Rios,&nbsp;Zackary B Becker,&nbsp;Brett Haltiwanger,&nbsp;Scott J Patlovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1535676020902614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the endorsement and support of the ABSA International Council and the Prevention, Preparedness and Response (P2R) Academy of The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Public Health, a survey to characterize the work settings in which biosafety professionals operate was conducted. The survey was the first of a planned series of 10 solicitations in support of an overarching \\\"Biosafety Analytics Initiative,\\\" the goal of which is to identify commonalities, trends, possible benchmarking opportunities, and professional training needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was developed, tested, and then distributed electronically for a 3-week period between May 29 and June 19, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 228 ABSA International members completed responses (15.6% of total membership). The results of the survey indicate that 59.7% of the total membership respondents conduct operations in the public or private academic setting, but when separated by domestic vs international respondents, 38% of the international respondents operate in government (nonacademic) settings. The bulk of biosafety activities were reported as providing support to BSL-1 and BSL-2 laboratories, with more than 90% of respondents indicating that they support work with risk group 1 and 2 organisms. Approximately 60% of the biosafety programs responding reported being organizationally aligned within institutional Environmental Health & Safety programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this survey serve as a foundation for current and future ABSA International priorities regarding professional development, recruitment, and training opportunities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"90-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1535676020902614\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1535676020902614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1535676020902614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:在美国生物安全协会国际理事会和得克萨斯大学休斯顿卫生科学中心公共卫生学院预防、准备和应对(P2R)学院的认可和支持下,开展了一项调查,以确定生物安全专业人员工作环境的特征。该调查是计划中的10个系列调查中的第一个,以支持总体的“生物安全分析倡议”,其目标是确定共性、趋势、可能的基准机会和专业培训需求。方法:该调查在2019年5月29日至6月19日期间进行开发,测试,然后以电子方式分发,为期3周。结果:共有228名ABSA International会员完成了问卷调查,占会员总数的15.6%。调查结果表明,59.7%的受访会员在公共或私人学术机构开展业务,但如果将国内受访者与国际受访者分开,38%的国际受访者在政府(非学术)机构开展业务。据报告,大部分生物安全活动为生物安全一级和生物安全二级实验室提供支持,90%以上的答复者表示,他们支持与风险一级和二级生物有关的工作。大约60%的生物安全项目在组织上与机构环境健康与安全项目保持一致。结论:本次调查的结果可以作为ABSA国际在专业发展、招聘和培训机会方面当前和未来优先事项的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of Work Settings in Which Biosafety Professionals Conduct Operations: Results from the First Survey of the Biosafety Analytics Initiative Survey Series.

Introduction: With the endorsement and support of the ABSA International Council and the Prevention, Preparedness and Response (P2R) Academy of The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Public Health, a survey to characterize the work settings in which biosafety professionals operate was conducted. The survey was the first of a planned series of 10 solicitations in support of an overarching "Biosafety Analytics Initiative," the goal of which is to identify commonalities, trends, possible benchmarking opportunities, and professional training needs.

Methods: The survey was developed, tested, and then distributed electronically for a 3-week period between May 29 and June 19, 2019.

Results: A total of 228 ABSA International members completed responses (15.6% of total membership). The results of the survey indicate that 59.7% of the total membership respondents conduct operations in the public or private academic setting, but when separated by domestic vs international respondents, 38% of the international respondents operate in government (nonacademic) settings. The bulk of biosafety activities were reported as providing support to BSL-1 and BSL-2 laboratories, with more than 90% of respondents indicating that they support work with risk group 1 and 2 organisms. Approximately 60% of the biosafety programs responding reported being organizationally aligned within institutional Environmental Health & Safety programs.

Conclusion: The results of this survey serve as a foundation for current and future ABSA International priorities regarding professional development, recruitment, and training opportunities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信