夹圈套法与预环技术用于胃粘膜下肿瘤切除的可行性和安全性:单中心经验(带视频)。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2022-08-17 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/7957877
Qi Tang, Rui-Yue Shi, Jun Yao, Li-Sheng Wang, De-Feng Li
{"title":"夹圈套法与预环技术用于胃粘膜下肿瘤切除的可行性和安全性:单中心经验(带视频)。","authors":"Qi Tang,&nbsp;Rui-Yue Shi,&nbsp;Jun Yao,&nbsp;Li-Sheng Wang,&nbsp;De-Feng Li","doi":"10.1155/2022/7957877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study compared the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) combined with clip-and-snare method and a prelooping technique (CSM-PLT) with ESD alone for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors (gSMTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled a matched group of 86 patients who received ESD combined with CSM-PLT or ESD alone from July 2010 to July 2020. The primary outcomes included complete resection, en bloc resection, and R0 resection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six patients with gSMTs were enrolled in ESD combined with CSM-PLT group and ESD group, respectively. There were no significant differences in gender, age, tumor size, tumor location, and tumor origin between the two groups. The complete resection, en bloc resection, and R0 resection rates were comparable between two groups (<i>P</i>=1, <i>P</i>=0.31, and <i>P</i>=0.25, respectively). There were no significant differences in terms of hospital stays, hospitalization cost, postoperative complications, and residual rate (<i>P</i>=0.42, <i>P</i>=0.74, <i>P</i>=0.65, and <i>P</i>=1, respectively) between the two groups. However, the ESD combined with CSM-PLT was associated with a shorter procedure duration and fewer intraoperative complications (<i>P</i> < 0.001 and <i>P</i>=0.024, respectively). In addition, the incidence of intraoperative bleeding in ESD combined with CSM-PLT group was significantly lower than that in ESD group (<i>P</i>=0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both ESD combined with CSM-PLT and ESD were effective and safe modalities for the treatment of gSMTs. However, ESD combined with CSM-PLT was associated with a shorter procedure duration and fewer intraoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48755,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"7957877"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402353/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Feasibility and Safety of the Clip-and-Snare Method with a Prelooping Technique for Gastric Submucosal Tumors Removal: A Single-Center Experience (with Video).\",\"authors\":\"Qi Tang,&nbsp;Rui-Yue Shi,&nbsp;Jun Yao,&nbsp;Li-Sheng Wang,&nbsp;De-Feng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/7957877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study compared the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) combined with clip-and-snare method and a prelooping technique (CSM-PLT) with ESD alone for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors (gSMTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled a matched group of 86 patients who received ESD combined with CSM-PLT or ESD alone from July 2010 to July 2020. The primary outcomes included complete resection, en bloc resection, and R0 resection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six patients with gSMTs were enrolled in ESD combined with CSM-PLT group and ESD group, respectively. There were no significant differences in gender, age, tumor size, tumor location, and tumor origin between the two groups. The complete resection, en bloc resection, and R0 resection rates were comparable between two groups (<i>P</i>=1, <i>P</i>=0.31, and <i>P</i>=0.25, respectively). There were no significant differences in terms of hospital stays, hospitalization cost, postoperative complications, and residual rate (<i>P</i>=0.42, <i>P</i>=0.74, <i>P</i>=0.65, and <i>P</i>=1, respectively) between the two groups. However, the ESD combined with CSM-PLT was associated with a shorter procedure duration and fewer intraoperative complications (<i>P</i> < 0.001 and <i>P</i>=0.024, respectively). In addition, the incidence of intraoperative bleeding in ESD combined with CSM-PLT group was significantly lower than that in ESD group (<i>P</i>=0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both ESD combined with CSM-PLT and ESD were effective and safe modalities for the treatment of gSMTs. However, ESD combined with CSM-PLT was associated with a shorter procedure duration and fewer intraoperative complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7957877\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402353/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7957877\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7957877","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)联合夹子-圈套法和预环技术(CSM-PLT)与单纯内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)治疗胃粘膜下肿瘤(gSMTs)的疗效和安全性。方法:2010年7月至2020年7月,我们回顾性地招募了86名匹配组的患者,这些患者接受了ESD联合CSM-PLT或单独ESD。主要结果包括完全切除、整体切除和R0切除。结果:86例gsmt患者分别被纳入ESD联合CSM-PLT组和ESD组。两组患者在性别、年龄、肿瘤大小、肿瘤位置、肿瘤来源等方面均无统计学差异。两组之间的完全切除、整体切除和R0切除率具有可比性(P=1、P=0.31和P=0.25)。两组患者住院时间、住院费用、术后并发症、残留率差异均无统计学意义(P=0.42、P=0.74、P=0.65、P=1)。然而,ESD联合CSM-PLT的手术时间更短,术中并发症更少(P < 0.001和P=0.024)。ESD联合CSM-PLT组术中出血发生率显著低于ESD组(P=0.04)。结论:ESD联合CSM-PLT和ESD治疗gsmt均是安全有效的治疗方法。然而,ESD联合CSM-PLT的手术时间更短,术中并发症更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Feasibility and Safety of the Clip-and-Snare Method with a Prelooping Technique for Gastric Submucosal Tumors Removal: A Single-Center Experience (with Video).

The Feasibility and Safety of the Clip-and-Snare Method with a Prelooping Technique for Gastric Submucosal Tumors Removal: A Single-Center Experience (with Video).

The Feasibility and Safety of the Clip-and-Snare Method with a Prelooping Technique for Gastric Submucosal Tumors Removal: A Single-Center Experience (with Video).

Aim: This study compared the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) combined with clip-and-snare method and a prelooping technique (CSM-PLT) with ESD alone for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors (gSMTs).

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled a matched group of 86 patients who received ESD combined with CSM-PLT or ESD alone from July 2010 to July 2020. The primary outcomes included complete resection, en bloc resection, and R0 resection.

Results: Eighty-six patients with gSMTs were enrolled in ESD combined with CSM-PLT group and ESD group, respectively. There were no significant differences in gender, age, tumor size, tumor location, and tumor origin between the two groups. The complete resection, en bloc resection, and R0 resection rates were comparable between two groups (P=1, P=0.31, and P=0.25, respectively). There were no significant differences in terms of hospital stays, hospitalization cost, postoperative complications, and residual rate (P=0.42, P=0.74, P=0.65, and P=1, respectively) between the two groups. However, the ESD combined with CSM-PLT was associated with a shorter procedure duration and fewer intraoperative complications (P < 0.001 and P=0.024, respectively). In addition, the incidence of intraoperative bleeding in ESD combined with CSM-PLT group was significantly lower than that in ESD group (P=0.04).

Conclusion: Both ESD combined with CSM-PLT and ESD were effective and safe modalities for the treatment of gSMTs. However, ESD combined with CSM-PLT was associated with a shorter procedure duration and fewer intraoperative complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of gastroenterology and liver disease - medicine and surgery. The Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is sponsored by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信