高密闭实验室中甲醛熏蒸的生物学验证和观察。

Jason Tearle, Gary MacRae, Spencer Andrews, Anthony Clarke, Jamie Stuart, Gilles Tremblay
{"title":"高密闭实验室中甲醛熏蒸的生物学验证和观察。","authors":"Jason Tearle,&nbsp;Gary MacRae,&nbsp;Spencer Andrews,&nbsp;Anthony Clarke,&nbsp;Jamie Stuart,&nbsp;Gilles Tremblay","doi":"10.1177/1535676019895084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The effectiveness of formaldehyde as a fumigant in laboratories, for equipment, and for containment barrier decontamination applications was assessed, in particular the ability to reproduce biological inactivation (6-log reduction) of commercially available rapid biological indicators in representative operational scenarios and their relative sensitivity to other biological and chemical indicators.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to describe observations and results of formaldehyde fumigation efficacy in high-containment laboratories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Biological indicators placed throughout laboratory spaces, including ventilation ductwork at distances up to 15 meters, inside pieces of equipment and in lengths of pipe, were mostly negative, demonstrating the ability of formaldehyde to reach the interior and external surfaces tested. Dwell times as short as 10 minutes were shown to be sufficient in barrier decontamination equipment for the fumigation of personal computers. Furthermore, a pipework bore:length ratio of 1:1500 was proven too great a challenge. Indicators placed after extracting HEPA filters in microbiological safety cabinets (MBSCs) were also successfully fumigated (at room temperature) relying solely on diffusion and in the cabinet workspace at 10°C to 12°C. In addition, pressures of up to 900 Pa were experienced in low-leakage laboratory spaces during fumigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Formaldehyde fumigation was shown to be effective in a variety of scenarios representing operational activities thereby giving process assurance.</p>","PeriodicalId":520561,"journal":{"name":"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association","volume":" ","pages":"41-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1535676019895084","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biological Validation and Observations of Formaldehyde Fumigation in Operational and Representative Scenarios in High-Containment Laboratories.\",\"authors\":\"Jason Tearle,&nbsp;Gary MacRae,&nbsp;Spencer Andrews,&nbsp;Anthony Clarke,&nbsp;Jamie Stuart,&nbsp;Gilles Tremblay\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1535676019895084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The effectiveness of formaldehyde as a fumigant in laboratories, for equipment, and for containment barrier decontamination applications was assessed, in particular the ability to reproduce biological inactivation (6-log reduction) of commercially available rapid biological indicators in representative operational scenarios and their relative sensitivity to other biological and chemical indicators.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to describe observations and results of formaldehyde fumigation efficacy in high-containment laboratories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Biological indicators placed throughout laboratory spaces, including ventilation ductwork at distances up to 15 meters, inside pieces of equipment and in lengths of pipe, were mostly negative, demonstrating the ability of formaldehyde to reach the interior and external surfaces tested. Dwell times as short as 10 minutes were shown to be sufficient in barrier decontamination equipment for the fumigation of personal computers. Furthermore, a pipework bore:length ratio of 1:1500 was proven too great a challenge. Indicators placed after extracting HEPA filters in microbiological safety cabinets (MBSCs) were also successfully fumigated (at room temperature) relying solely on diffusion and in the cabinet workspace at 10°C to 12°C. In addition, pressures of up to 900 Pa were experienced in low-leakage laboratory spaces during fumigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Formaldehyde fumigation was shown to be effective in a variety of scenarios representing operational activities thereby giving process assurance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"41-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1535676019895084\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1535676019895084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1535676019895084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

简介:评估了甲醛作为熏蒸剂在实验室、设备和容器屏障去污应用中的有效性,特别是在代表性操作情景中再现市售快速生物指示剂生物失活(减少6对数)的能力及其对其他生物和化学指示剂的相对敏感性。目的:本研究的主要目的是描述高密闭实验室甲醛熏蒸效果的观察结果和结果。结果:放置在整个实验室空间的生物指标,包括距离达15米的通风管道,设备内部和管道长度,大多为阴性,表明甲醛能够到达被测试的内部和外部表面。停留时间短至10分钟就足以在个人电脑熏蒸的屏障净化设备。此外,1:1500的管道孔长比被证明是一个太大的挑战。在微生物安全柜(MBSCs)中提取HEPA过滤器后放置的指示剂也成功地在10°C至12°C的机柜工作空间中仅依靠扩散熏蒸(室温)。此外,在熏蒸过程中,在低泄漏的实验室空间中经历了高达900 Pa的压力。结论:甲醛熏蒸被证明是有效的,在各种情况下代表业务活动,从而提供过程保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biological Validation and Observations of Formaldehyde Fumigation in Operational and Representative Scenarios in High-Containment Laboratories.

Introduction: The effectiveness of formaldehyde as a fumigant in laboratories, for equipment, and for containment barrier decontamination applications was assessed, in particular the ability to reproduce biological inactivation (6-log reduction) of commercially available rapid biological indicators in representative operational scenarios and their relative sensitivity to other biological and chemical indicators.

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to describe observations and results of formaldehyde fumigation efficacy in high-containment laboratories.

Results: Biological indicators placed throughout laboratory spaces, including ventilation ductwork at distances up to 15 meters, inside pieces of equipment and in lengths of pipe, were mostly negative, demonstrating the ability of formaldehyde to reach the interior and external surfaces tested. Dwell times as short as 10 minutes were shown to be sufficient in barrier decontamination equipment for the fumigation of personal computers. Furthermore, a pipework bore:length ratio of 1:1500 was proven too great a challenge. Indicators placed after extracting HEPA filters in microbiological safety cabinets (MBSCs) were also successfully fumigated (at room temperature) relying solely on diffusion and in the cabinet workspace at 10°C to 12°C. In addition, pressures of up to 900 Pa were experienced in low-leakage laboratory spaces during fumigation.

Conclusions: Formaldehyde fumigation was shown to be effective in a variety of scenarios representing operational activities thereby giving process assurance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信