临床PET中COVID-19疫苗接种后[18F]-PSMA-1007摄取的频率和强度。

BJR open Pub Date : 2022-02-01 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1259/bjro.20210084
Alexander Maurer, Helen Schiesser, Stephan Skawran, Antonio G Gennari, Manuel Dittli, Irene A Burger, Cäcilia Mader, Christoph Berger, Daniel Eberli, Martin W Huellner, Michael Messerli
{"title":"临床PET中COVID-19疫苗接种后[18F]-PSMA-1007摄取的频率和强度。","authors":"Alexander Maurer,&nbsp;Helen Schiesser,&nbsp;Stephan Skawran,&nbsp;Antonio G Gennari,&nbsp;Manuel Dittli,&nbsp;Irene A Burger,&nbsp;Cäcilia Mader,&nbsp;Christoph Berger,&nbsp;Daniel Eberli,&nbsp;Martin W Huellner,&nbsp;Michael Messerli","doi":"10.1259/bjro.20210084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the frequency and intensity of [<sup>18</sup>F]-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 axillary uptake in lymph nodes ipsilateral to COVID-19 vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) in patients with prostate cancer referred for oncological [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/CT or PET/MR imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>126 patients undergoing [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA PET/CT or PET/MR imaging were retrospectively included. [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA activity (maximum standardized uptake value) of ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes was measured and compared with the non-vaccinated contralateral side and with a non-vaccinated negative control group. [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA active lymph node metastases were measured to serve as quantitative reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in maximum standardized uptake value in ipsilateral and compared to contralateral axillary lymph nodes in the vaccination group (<i>n</i> = 63, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and no such difference in the non-vaccinated control group (<i>n = 63, p</i> = 0.379). Vaccinated patients showed mildly increased axillary lymph node [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA uptake as compared to non-vaccinated patients (<i>p</i> = 0.03). [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA activity of of lymph node metastases was significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to axillary lymph nodes of vaccinated patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest mildly increased [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA uptake after COVID-19 vaccination in ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes. However, given the significantly higher [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA uptake of prostatic lymph node metastases compared to \"reactive\" nodes after COVID-19 vaccination, no therapeutic and diagnostic dilemma is to be expected.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>No specific preparations or precautions (<i>e.g.</i> adaption of vaccination scheduling) need to be undertaken in patients undergoing [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA PET imaging after COVID-19 vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":72419,"journal":{"name":"BJR open","volume":" ","pages":"20210084"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364367/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency and intensity of [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA-1007 uptake after COVID-19 vaccination in clinical PET.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Maurer,&nbsp;Helen Schiesser,&nbsp;Stephan Skawran,&nbsp;Antonio G Gennari,&nbsp;Manuel Dittli,&nbsp;Irene A Burger,&nbsp;Cäcilia Mader,&nbsp;Christoph Berger,&nbsp;Daniel Eberli,&nbsp;Martin W Huellner,&nbsp;Michael Messerli\",\"doi\":\"10.1259/bjro.20210084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the frequency and intensity of [<sup>18</sup>F]-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 axillary uptake in lymph nodes ipsilateral to COVID-19 vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) in patients with prostate cancer referred for oncological [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/CT or PET/MR imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>126 patients undergoing [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA PET/CT or PET/MR imaging were retrospectively included. [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA activity (maximum standardized uptake value) of ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes was measured and compared with the non-vaccinated contralateral side and with a non-vaccinated negative control group. [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA active lymph node metastases were measured to serve as quantitative reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in maximum standardized uptake value in ipsilateral and compared to contralateral axillary lymph nodes in the vaccination group (<i>n</i> = 63, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and no such difference in the non-vaccinated control group (<i>n = 63, p</i> = 0.379). Vaccinated patients showed mildly increased axillary lymph node [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA uptake as compared to non-vaccinated patients (<i>p</i> = 0.03). [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA activity of of lymph node metastases was significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to axillary lymph nodes of vaccinated patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest mildly increased [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA uptake after COVID-19 vaccination in ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes. However, given the significantly higher [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA uptake of prostatic lymph node metastases compared to \\\"reactive\\\" nodes after COVID-19 vaccination, no therapeutic and diagnostic dilemma is to be expected.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>No specific preparations or precautions (<i>e.g.</i> adaption of vaccination scheduling) need to be undertaken in patients undergoing [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA PET imaging after COVID-19 vaccination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJR open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"20210084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364367/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJR open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:评估在转诊进行肿瘤[18F]-PSMA正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/CT或PET/MR成像的前列腺癌患者中,接种BNT162b2(辉瑞- biontech)或mRNA-1273 (Moderna)的COVID-19疫苗同侧淋巴结腋下摄取[18F]-前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)-1007的频率和强度。方法:回顾性分析126例接受[18F]-PSMA PET/CT或PET/MR成像的患者。[18F]测量同侧腋窝淋巴结的psma活性(最大标准化摄取值),并与未接种疫苗的对侧和未接种疫苗的阴性对照组进行比较。[18F]测定-PSMA活动性淋巴结转移作为定量参考。结果:接种组同侧腋窝淋巴结最大标准化摄取值与对侧腋窝淋巴结比较差异有统计学意义(n = 63, p < 0.001),未接种组腋窝淋巴结最大标准化摄取值无统计学意义(n = 63, p = 0.379)。与未接种疫苗的患者相比,接种疫苗的患者腋窝淋巴结[18F]-PSMA摄取轻度增加(p = 0.03)。[18F]与接种疫苗患者腋窝淋巴结相比,淋巴结转移灶的psma活性显著升高(p < 0.001)。结论:我们的数据表明,接种COVID-19后,同侧腋窝淋巴结的[18F]-PSMA摄取轻度增加。然而,鉴于与COVID-19疫苗接种后的“反应性”淋巴结相比,前列腺淋巴结转移的[18F]-PSMA摄取明显更高,因此预计不会出现治疗和诊断困境。知识进步:在COVID-19疫苗接种后接受[18F]-PSMA PET成像的患者无需采取特定的准备或预防措施(例如调整疫苗接种计划)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Frequency and intensity of [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA-1007 uptake after COVID-19 vaccination in clinical PET.

Frequency and intensity of [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA-1007 uptake after COVID-19 vaccination in clinical PET.

Frequency and intensity of [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA-1007 uptake after COVID-19 vaccination in clinical PET.

Frequency and intensity of [18F]-PSMA-1007 uptake after COVID-19 vaccination in clinical PET.

Objectives: To assess the frequency and intensity of [18F]-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 axillary uptake in lymph nodes ipsilateral to COVID-19 vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) in patients with prostate cancer referred for oncological [18F]-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/CT or PET/MR imaging.

Methods: 126 patients undergoing [18F]-PSMA PET/CT or PET/MR imaging were retrospectively included. [18F]-PSMA activity (maximum standardized uptake value) of ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes was measured and compared with the non-vaccinated contralateral side and with a non-vaccinated negative control group. [18F]-PSMA active lymph node metastases were measured to serve as quantitative reference.

Results: There was a significant difference in maximum standardized uptake value in ipsilateral and compared to contralateral axillary lymph nodes in the vaccination group (n = 63, p < 0.001) and no such difference in the non-vaccinated control group (n = 63, p = 0.379). Vaccinated patients showed mildly increased axillary lymph node [18F]-PSMA uptake as compared to non-vaccinated patients (p = 0.03). [18F]-PSMA activity of of lymph node metastases was significantly higher (p < 0.001) compared to axillary lymph nodes of vaccinated patients.

Conclusion: Our data suggest mildly increased [18F]-PSMA uptake after COVID-19 vaccination in ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes. However, given the significantly higher [18F]-PSMA uptake of prostatic lymph node metastases compared to "reactive" nodes after COVID-19 vaccination, no therapeutic and diagnostic dilemma is to be expected.

Advances in knowledge: No specific preparations or precautions (e.g. adaption of vaccination scheduling) need to be undertaken in patients undergoing [18F]-PSMA PET imaging after COVID-19 vaccination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信