言语评定量表对髋部骨折患者术后疼痛的评价是可靠的。

Q2 Medicine
Pain Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-05-20 DOI:10.1155/2015/676212
Rune Dueholm Bech, Jens Lauritsen, Ole Ovesen, Søren Overgaard
{"title":"言语评定量表对髋部骨折患者术后疼痛的评价是可靠的。","authors":"Rune Dueholm Bech,&nbsp;Jens Lauritsen,&nbsp;Ole Ovesen,&nbsp;Søren Overgaard","doi":"10.1155/2015/676212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Hip fracture patients represent a challenge to pain rating due to the high prevalence of cognitive impairment. Methods. Patients prospectively rated pain on the VRS. Furthermore, patients described the changes in pain after raising their leg, with one of five descriptors. Agreement between paired measures on the VRS at rest and by passive straight leg raise with a one-minute interval between ratings at rest and three-minute interval for straight leg raise was expressed by kappa coefficients. Reliability of this assessment of pain using the VRS was compared to the validity of assessing possible change in pain from the selected descriptors. Cognitive status was quantified by the short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test. Results. 110 patients were included. Paired scores with maximum disagreement of one scale point reached 97% at rest and 95% at straight leg raise. Linear weighted kappa coefficients ranged from 0.68 (95% CI = 0.59-0.77) at leg raise to 0.75 (95% CI = 0.65-0.85) at rest. Unweighted kappa coefficients of agreement in recalled pain compared to agreement of paired VRS scores ranged from 0.57 (95% CI = 0.49-0.65) to 0.36 (95% CI = 0.31-0.41). Interpretation. The VRS is reliable for assessment of pain after hip fracture. The validity of intermittent questioning about possible change in pain intensity is poor. </p>","PeriodicalId":19786,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/676212","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Verbal Rating Scale Is Reliable for Assessment of Postoperative Pain in Hip Fracture Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Rune Dueholm Bech,&nbsp;Jens Lauritsen,&nbsp;Ole Ovesen,&nbsp;Søren Overgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2015/676212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background. Hip fracture patients represent a challenge to pain rating due to the high prevalence of cognitive impairment. Methods. Patients prospectively rated pain on the VRS. Furthermore, patients described the changes in pain after raising their leg, with one of five descriptors. Agreement between paired measures on the VRS at rest and by passive straight leg raise with a one-minute interval between ratings at rest and three-minute interval for straight leg raise was expressed by kappa coefficients. Reliability of this assessment of pain using the VRS was compared to the validity of assessing possible change in pain from the selected descriptors. Cognitive status was quantified by the short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test. Results. 110 patients were included. Paired scores with maximum disagreement of one scale point reached 97% at rest and 95% at straight leg raise. Linear weighted kappa coefficients ranged from 0.68 (95% CI = 0.59-0.77) at leg raise to 0.75 (95% CI = 0.65-0.85) at rest. Unweighted kappa coefficients of agreement in recalled pain compared to agreement of paired VRS scores ranged from 0.57 (95% CI = 0.49-0.65) to 0.36 (95% CI = 0.31-0.41). Interpretation. The VRS is reliable for assessment of pain after hip fracture. The validity of intermittent questioning about possible change in pain intensity is poor. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/676212\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/676212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/5/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/676212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

摘要

背景。髋部骨折患者由于认知障碍的高发,对疼痛分级提出了挑战。方法。患者在VRS上对疼痛进行前瞻性评价。此外,患者用五个描述词中的一个描述抬起腿后疼痛的变化。静止状态下的VRS测量值与被动直腿抬高的VRS测量值之间的一致性用kappa系数表示,静止状态下的VRS测量值与被动直腿抬高的VRS测量值之间的间隔为1分钟。使用VRS评估疼痛的可靠性与从所选描述符评估疼痛可能变化的有效性进行了比较。认知状态通过短期定向-记忆-集中测试进行量化。结果:纳入110例患者。最大不一致1个量表点的配对得分在休息时达到97%,在直腿抬高时达到95%。线性加权kappa系数范围从腿抬高时的0.68 (95% CI = 0.59-0.77)到静止时的0.75 (95% CI = 0.65-0.85)。与配对VRS评分的一致性相比,回忆疼痛的未加权kappa一致性系数从0.57 (95% CI = 0.49-0.65)到0.36 (95% CI = 0.31-0.41)不等。解释。VRS是评估髋部骨折后疼痛的可靠方法。间歇性询问疼痛强度可能发生的变化的有效性很差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Verbal Rating Scale Is Reliable for Assessment of Postoperative Pain in Hip Fracture Patients.

The Verbal Rating Scale Is Reliable for Assessment of Postoperative Pain in Hip Fracture Patients.

The Verbal Rating Scale Is Reliable for Assessment of Postoperative Pain in Hip Fracture Patients.

The Verbal Rating Scale Is Reliable for Assessment of Postoperative Pain in Hip Fracture Patients.

Background. Hip fracture patients represent a challenge to pain rating due to the high prevalence of cognitive impairment. Methods. Patients prospectively rated pain on the VRS. Furthermore, patients described the changes in pain after raising their leg, with one of five descriptors. Agreement between paired measures on the VRS at rest and by passive straight leg raise with a one-minute interval between ratings at rest and three-minute interval for straight leg raise was expressed by kappa coefficients. Reliability of this assessment of pain using the VRS was compared to the validity of assessing possible change in pain from the selected descriptors. Cognitive status was quantified by the short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test. Results. 110 patients were included. Paired scores with maximum disagreement of one scale point reached 97% at rest and 95% at straight leg raise. Linear weighted kappa coefficients ranged from 0.68 (95% CI = 0.59-0.77) at leg raise to 0.75 (95% CI = 0.65-0.85) at rest. Unweighted kappa coefficients of agreement in recalled pain compared to agreement of paired VRS scores ranged from 0.57 (95% CI = 0.49-0.65) to 0.36 (95% CI = 0.31-0.41). Interpretation. The VRS is reliable for assessment of pain after hip fracture. The validity of intermittent questioning about possible change in pain intensity is poor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research and Treatment
Pain Research and Treatment Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信