膀胱发育不良和原位癌。

IF 0.1 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine
Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Rita C Marques, Rodolfo Montironi, Carlos Reymundo, Jorge Fonseca, Liang Cheng
{"title":"膀胱发育不良和原位癌。","authors":"Antonio Lopez-Beltran,&nbsp;Rita C Marques,&nbsp;Rodolfo Montironi,&nbsp;Carlos Reymundo,&nbsp;Jorge Fonseca,&nbsp;Liang Cheng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urothelial dysplasia (low-grade intraurothelial neoplasia) is recognized as a premalignant urothelial lesion in the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system. Although clarification of the diagnostic criteria of urothelial dysplasia has improved in recent years, there is still a lack of interobserver reproducibility. Active clinical follow-up is mandatory in patients with a diagnosis of urothelial dysplasia since it constitutes a marker of urothelial instability, and disease progression, in up to 19% of cases. The differential diagnosis of urothelial dysplasia is with other flat urothelial lesions with atypia, including flat urothelial hyperplasia, reactive urothelial atypia, urothelial atypia of unknown significance, and urothelial carcinoma in situ (high-grade intraurothelial neoplasia). In most cases, especially when small amounts of tissue are available, morphologic features alone may not be sufficient for diagnosis. Immunohistochemistry can be of help in selected cases, and a panel of cytokeratin 20, p53, and CD44 may help in the diagnosis. The use of HER2, p16, and Racemase remains as an option pending validation. Herein, we present the pathologic features and clinical significance of urothelial dysplasia and carcinoma in situ with emphasis on differential diagnosis from common flat lesions with atypia.</p>","PeriodicalId":55517,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology","volume":"37 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dysplasia and carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Lopez-Beltran,&nbsp;Rita C Marques,&nbsp;Rodolfo Montironi,&nbsp;Carlos Reymundo,&nbsp;Jorge Fonseca,&nbsp;Liang Cheng\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Urothelial dysplasia (low-grade intraurothelial neoplasia) is recognized as a premalignant urothelial lesion in the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system. Although clarification of the diagnostic criteria of urothelial dysplasia has improved in recent years, there is still a lack of interobserver reproducibility. Active clinical follow-up is mandatory in patients with a diagnosis of urothelial dysplasia since it constitutes a marker of urothelial instability, and disease progression, in up to 19% of cases. The differential diagnosis of urothelial dysplasia is with other flat urothelial lesions with atypia, including flat urothelial hyperplasia, reactive urothelial atypia, urothelial atypia of unknown significance, and urothelial carcinoma in situ (high-grade intraurothelial neoplasia). In most cases, especially when small amounts of tissue are available, morphologic features alone may not be sufficient for diagnosis. Immunohistochemistry can be of help in selected cases, and a panel of cytokeratin 20, p53, and CD44 may help in the diagnosis. The use of HER2, p16, and Racemase remains as an option pending validation. Herein, we present the pathologic features and clinical significance of urothelial dysplasia and carcinoma in situ with emphasis on differential diagnosis from common flat lesions with atypia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"29-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2004年世界卫生组织(WHO)分类系统中,尿路上皮异常增生(低级别尿路上皮内瘤变)被认为是一种癌前尿路上皮病变。尽管近年来对尿路上皮异常增生的诊断标准的澄清有所改善,但仍然缺乏观察者之间的可重复性。在诊断为尿路上皮发育不良的患者中,积极的临床随访是强制性的,因为在高达19%的病例中,这是尿路上皮不稳定和疾病进展的标志。尿路上皮异常增生的鉴别诊断是与其他非典型性扁平尿路上皮病变,包括扁平尿路上皮增生、反应性尿路上皮非典型性、意义不明的尿路上皮非典型性和尿路上皮原位癌(高级别尿路上皮内瘤变)。在大多数情况下,特别是当少量组织可用时,仅凭形态学特征可能不足以进行诊断。免疫组织化学可以帮助选定的情况下,和一组细胞角蛋白20,p53和CD44可能有助于诊断。HER2、p16和消旋酶的使用仍然是有待验证的选项。在此,我们介绍尿路上皮异常增生和原位癌的病理特征和临床意义,重点是与常见的非典型扁平病变的鉴别诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dysplasia and carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder.

Urothelial dysplasia (low-grade intraurothelial neoplasia) is recognized as a premalignant urothelial lesion in the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system. Although clarification of the diagnostic criteria of urothelial dysplasia has improved in recent years, there is still a lack of interobserver reproducibility. Active clinical follow-up is mandatory in patients with a diagnosis of urothelial dysplasia since it constitutes a marker of urothelial instability, and disease progression, in up to 19% of cases. The differential diagnosis of urothelial dysplasia is with other flat urothelial lesions with atypia, including flat urothelial hyperplasia, reactive urothelial atypia, urothelial atypia of unknown significance, and urothelial carcinoma in situ (high-grade intraurothelial neoplasia). In most cases, especially when small amounts of tissue are available, morphologic features alone may not be sufficient for diagnosis. Immunohistochemistry can be of help in selected cases, and a panel of cytokeratin 20, p53, and CD44 may help in the diagnosis. The use of HER2, p16, and Racemase remains as an option pending validation. Herein, we present the pathologic features and clinical significance of urothelial dysplasia and carcinoma in situ with emphasis on differential diagnosis from common flat lesions with atypia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: AQCH is an Official Periodical of The International Academy of Cytology and the Italian Society of Urologic Pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信