Dongmei Wang, Guangsheng Chen, Liusong Tang, Qiaoling Li
{"title":"激光辅助上皮下角膜切除术和经上皮光屈光性角膜切除术术后疼痛的比较:一项前瞻性、随机配对的双侧眼研究。","authors":"Dongmei Wang, Guangsheng Chen, Liusong Tang, Qiaoling Li","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare postoperative pain following laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK, two-step surgery) and alleviate postoperative subjective pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients (60 eyes) with myopia or myopic astigmatism were consecutively recruited into this prospective, randomized paired study. Patients underwent LASEK in one eye, and T-PRK in the other. The degree of pain was rated on a scale of 0-10 on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and subepithelial corneal haze were assessed at postoperative 1 and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pain was relieved on the 4th postoperative day in all patients, healing of corneal epithelium was observed at 4-5 days after surgery and contact lenses were removed promptly. At postoperative 1 day, the mean subjective pain score in the LASEK group was 3.2 ± 1.88 and 4.43 ± 1.61 in T-PRK group (P = 0.008). No significant difference was found between two groups on postoperative 2 and 3 days. At postoperative 3 months, the percentage of UCVA ≥ 0.8 in the LASEK group was 100% and 96.7% in the T-PRK group (P = 0.24), 93.3% of patients in the LASEK with UCVA ≥ 1.0 and 90% in the T-PRK group (P = 0.64). In the LASEK group, the value of corneal haze was 0.26 ± 0.21 and 0.27 ± 0.25 in the T-PRK group (P = 0.877).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Good visual acuity was obtained in both groups at postoperative 3 months. Compared with those in the T-PRK group, patients undergoing had less discomfort in the LASEK group, which may be associated with corneal epithelial activity. The changing curve of subjective pain in the T-PRK group was relatively flat and stable at postoperative 3 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":12096,"journal":{"name":"眼科学报","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of postoperative pain following laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective, random paired bilateral eye study.\",\"authors\":\"Dongmei Wang, Guangsheng Chen, Liusong Tang, Qiaoling Li\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare postoperative pain following laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK, two-step surgery) and alleviate postoperative subjective pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients (60 eyes) with myopia or myopic astigmatism were consecutively recruited into this prospective, randomized paired study. Patients underwent LASEK in one eye, and T-PRK in the other. The degree of pain was rated on a scale of 0-10 on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and subepithelial corneal haze were assessed at postoperative 1 and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pain was relieved on the 4th postoperative day in all patients, healing of corneal epithelium was observed at 4-5 days after surgery and contact lenses were removed promptly. At postoperative 1 day, the mean subjective pain score in the LASEK group was 3.2 ± 1.88 and 4.43 ± 1.61 in T-PRK group (P = 0.008). No significant difference was found between two groups on postoperative 2 and 3 days. At postoperative 3 months, the percentage of UCVA ≥ 0.8 in the LASEK group was 100% and 96.7% in the T-PRK group (P = 0.24), 93.3% of patients in the LASEK with UCVA ≥ 1.0 and 90% in the T-PRK group (P = 0.64). In the LASEK group, the value of corneal haze was 0.26 ± 0.21 and 0.27 ± 0.25 in the T-PRK group (P = 0.877).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Good visual acuity was obtained in both groups at postoperative 3 months. Compared with those in the T-PRK group, patients undergoing had less discomfort in the LASEK group, which may be associated with corneal epithelial activity. The changing curve of subjective pain in the T-PRK group was relatively flat and stable at postoperative 3 days.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"眼科学报\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"眼科学报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"眼科学报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of postoperative pain following laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective, random paired bilateral eye study.
Purpose: To compare postoperative pain following laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK, two-step surgery) and alleviate postoperative subjective pain.
Methods: Thirty patients (60 eyes) with myopia or myopic astigmatism were consecutively recruited into this prospective, randomized paired study. Patients underwent LASEK in one eye, and T-PRK in the other. The degree of pain was rated on a scale of 0-10 on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and subepithelial corneal haze were assessed at postoperative 1 and 3 months.
Results: The pain was relieved on the 4th postoperative day in all patients, healing of corneal epithelium was observed at 4-5 days after surgery and contact lenses were removed promptly. At postoperative 1 day, the mean subjective pain score in the LASEK group was 3.2 ± 1.88 and 4.43 ± 1.61 in T-PRK group (P = 0.008). No significant difference was found between two groups on postoperative 2 and 3 days. At postoperative 3 months, the percentage of UCVA ≥ 0.8 in the LASEK group was 100% and 96.7% in the T-PRK group (P = 0.24), 93.3% of patients in the LASEK with UCVA ≥ 1.0 and 90% in the T-PRK group (P = 0.64). In the LASEK group, the value of corneal haze was 0.26 ± 0.21 and 0.27 ± 0.25 in the T-PRK group (P = 0.877).
Conclusion: Good visual acuity was obtained in both groups at postoperative 3 months. Compared with those in the T-PRK group, patients undergoing had less discomfort in the LASEK group, which may be associated with corneal epithelial activity. The changing curve of subjective pain in the T-PRK group was relatively flat and stable at postoperative 3 days.
期刊介绍:
Eye science was founded in 1985. It is a national medical journal supervised by the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University, and hosted by Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center (in October 2020, it was changed from a quarterly to a monthly, with the publication number: ISSN: 1000-4432; CN: 44-1119/R). It is edited by Ge Jian, former dean of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, Liu Yizhi, director and dean of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, and Lin Haotian, deputy director of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, as executive editor. It mainly reports on new developments and trends in the field of ophthalmology at home and abroad, focusing on basic research in ophthalmology, clinical experience, and theoretical knowledge and technical operations related to epidemiology. It has been included in important databases at home and abroad, such as Chemical Abstract (CA), China Journal Full-text Database (CNKI), China Core Journals (Selection) Database (Wanfang), and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP).