伊蚊两性二态体型及发育时间可塑性研究(双翅目:库蚊科)。

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Evolutionary Ecology Research Pub Date : 2014-01-01
Jillian D Wormington, Steven A Juliano
{"title":"伊蚊两性二态体型及发育时间可塑性研究(双翅目:库蚊科)。","authors":"Jillian D Wormington,&nbsp;Steven A Juliano","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in insects often accompanies a sexual difference in development time, sexual bimaturism (SBM).</p><p><strong>Goal: </strong>To determine whether three <i>Aedes</i> mosquito species have similar plasticity in SSD, attain sexual dimorphism through similar strategies, and whether SSD and SBM are associated.</p><p><strong>Organisms: </strong><i>Aedes albopictus</i>, <i>Aedes aegypti</i>, and <i>Aedes triseriatus</i> (Diptera: Culicidae).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In four different food availability environments, we quantified plastic responses of relative growth rate (RGR), development time, and adult body size in individually reared males and females.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Food availability affected RGR differently for the sexes for all three species. The RGR of males and females differed significantly in the 0.1 g/L food treatment. This difference did not account for observed SSD. Food levels over which the largest changes in RGR were observed differed among the species. Male and female adult mass and development time were jointly affected by food availability in a pattern that differed among the three species, so that degree of SSD and SBM changed differentially with food availability for all three species. Development time was generally less sexually dimorphic than mass, particularly in <i>A. albopictus</i>. At lower food levels, <i>A. aegypti</i> and <i>A. triseriatus</i> had accentuated dimorphism in development time. These results, combined with our knowledge of mosquito life history, suggest that a direct benefit of SBM is improbable for mosquitoes and that the observed intersexual differences in development time are more likely byproducts of selection for SSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50469,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Ecology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4319369/pdf/nihms659432.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexually dimorphic body size and development time plasticity in <i>Aedes</i> mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae).\",\"authors\":\"Jillian D Wormington,&nbsp;Steven A Juliano\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in insects often accompanies a sexual difference in development time, sexual bimaturism (SBM).</p><p><strong>Goal: </strong>To determine whether three <i>Aedes</i> mosquito species have similar plasticity in SSD, attain sexual dimorphism through similar strategies, and whether SSD and SBM are associated.</p><p><strong>Organisms: </strong><i>Aedes albopictus</i>, <i>Aedes aegypti</i>, and <i>Aedes triseriatus</i> (Diptera: Culicidae).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In four different food availability environments, we quantified plastic responses of relative growth rate (RGR), development time, and adult body size in individually reared males and females.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Food availability affected RGR differently for the sexes for all three species. The RGR of males and females differed significantly in the 0.1 g/L food treatment. This difference did not account for observed SSD. Food levels over which the largest changes in RGR were observed differed among the species. Male and female adult mass and development time were jointly affected by food availability in a pattern that differed among the three species, so that degree of SSD and SBM changed differentially with food availability for all three species. Development time was generally less sexually dimorphic than mass, particularly in <i>A. albopictus</i>. At lower food levels, <i>A. aegypti</i> and <i>A. triseriatus</i> had accentuated dimorphism in development time. These results, combined with our knowledge of mosquito life history, suggest that a direct benefit of SBM is improbable for mosquitoes and that the observed intersexual differences in development time are more likely byproducts of selection for SSD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolutionary Ecology Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4319369/pdf/nihms659432.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolutionary Ecology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Ecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:昆虫性别大小二态性(SSD)通常伴随着发育时间的性别差异,即两性双态性(SBM)。目的:确定三种伊蚊在SSD中是否具有相似的可塑性,通过相似的策略实现性二态性,以及SSD与SBM是否存在关联。生物:白纹伊蚊、埃及伊蚊、三体伊蚊(双翅目:库蚊科)。方法:在4种不同的食物可得性环境下,对单独饲养的雄性和雌性的相对生长率(RGR)、发育时间和成虫体型的可塑性响应进行量化。结果:食物可得性对三种物种的RGR有不同的性别影响。在0.1 g/L食物处理下,雄性和雌性的RGR差异显著。这种差异没有考虑到观察到的SSD。观察到RGR变化最大的食物水平在不同物种之间存在差异。雄、雌成虫数量和发育时间受食物可得性的共同影响,但在不同物种间存在差异,因此,三种物种的SSD和SBM程度随食物可得性的变化存在差异。白纹伊蚊的发育时间性别二型性普遍低于种群发育时间,白纹伊蚊尤为明显。在较低食物水平下,埃及伊蚊和三角伊蚊在发育时间上的二态性明显增强。这些结果,结合我们对蚊子生活史的了解,表明SBM对蚊子的直接好处是不可能的,所观察到的发育时间的雌雄间差异更可能是选择SSD的副产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sexually dimorphic body size and development time plasticity in <i>Aedes</i> mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae).

Sexually dimorphic body size and development time plasticity in <i>Aedes</i> mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae).

Sexually dimorphic body size and development time plasticity in <i>Aedes</i> mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae).

Sexually dimorphic body size and development time plasticity in Aedes mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae).

Background: Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in insects often accompanies a sexual difference in development time, sexual bimaturism (SBM).

Goal: To determine whether three Aedes mosquito species have similar plasticity in SSD, attain sexual dimorphism through similar strategies, and whether SSD and SBM are associated.

Organisms: Aedes albopictus, Aedes aegypti, and Aedes triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae).

Methods: In four different food availability environments, we quantified plastic responses of relative growth rate (RGR), development time, and adult body size in individually reared males and females.

Results: Food availability affected RGR differently for the sexes for all three species. The RGR of males and females differed significantly in the 0.1 g/L food treatment. This difference did not account for observed SSD. Food levels over which the largest changes in RGR were observed differed among the species. Male and female adult mass and development time were jointly affected by food availability in a pattern that differed among the three species, so that degree of SSD and SBM changed differentially with food availability for all three species. Development time was generally less sexually dimorphic than mass, particularly in A. albopictus. At lower food levels, A. aegypti and A. triseriatus had accentuated dimorphism in development time. These results, combined with our knowledge of mosquito life history, suggest that a direct benefit of SBM is improbable for mosquitoes and that the observed intersexual differences in development time are more likely byproducts of selection for SSD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Ecology Research
Evolutionary Ecology Research 生物-进化生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Ecology Research publishes original research contributions focusing on the overlap between ecology and evolution. Papers may treat any taxon or be general. They may be empirical, theoretical or a combination of the two. EER prefers conceptual contributions that take intellectual risks or that test ideas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信