监测和报告医院获得性疾病:联邦主义方法。

Medicare & medicaid research review Pub Date : 2015-01-06 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.5600/mmrr.004.04.a04
Nathan West, Terry Eng
{"title":"监测和报告医院获得性疾病:联邦主义方法。","authors":"Nathan West,&nbsp;Terry Eng","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.004.04.a04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serious adverse events that occur in hospitals rank as a leading cause of preventable death in the United States. Many states operate reporting systems to monitor and publicly report serious adverse events, a subset that falls under Medicare's Hospital-Acquired Conditions (HACs).</p><p><strong>Purposes: </strong>Identify and describe state efforts, and the supporting role of federal initiatives, to track and report HACs and other serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Document review of state and federal reports, databases, and policies for HACs and other serious adverse events; conduct semi-structured telephone interviews with state health department officials and directors of patient safety organizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia (D.C.) track at least one Medicare HAC. Five states collect nearly all ten Medicare HACs (9-10). Eighteen states and D.C. track events through both a state-based reporting system and the Centers for Disease Control National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) for health-care associated infections (HAI). For serious adverse events, most states either partially or fully adopted the National Quality Forum's Serious Reportable Events. For HAIs, thirty states and D.C. mandate reporting through NHSN. States interviewed reported that Medicare's choice of HACs for nonpayment had at least a partial influence on which serious adverse events required reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many states use the collected data on HACs and other events for quality improvement initiatives and to provide greater transparency through public reporting. More work and research is needed to develop a national reporting system template that has standard definitions, methodology, and reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"4 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4288371/pdf/mmrr2014-004-04-a04.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring and reporting hospital-acquired conditions: a federalist approach.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan West,&nbsp;Terry Eng\",\"doi\":\"10.5600/mmrr.004.04.a04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serious adverse events that occur in hospitals rank as a leading cause of preventable death in the United States. Many states operate reporting systems to monitor and publicly report serious adverse events, a subset that falls under Medicare's Hospital-Acquired Conditions (HACs).</p><p><strong>Purposes: </strong>Identify and describe state efforts, and the supporting role of federal initiatives, to track and report HACs and other serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Document review of state and federal reports, databases, and policies for HACs and other serious adverse events; conduct semi-structured telephone interviews with state health department officials and directors of patient safety organizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia (D.C.) track at least one Medicare HAC. Five states collect nearly all ten Medicare HACs (9-10). Eighteen states and D.C. track events through both a state-based reporting system and the Centers for Disease Control National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) for health-care associated infections (HAI). For serious adverse events, most states either partially or fully adopted the National Quality Forum's Serious Reportable Events. For HAIs, thirty states and D.C. mandate reporting through NHSN. States interviewed reported that Medicare's choice of HACs for nonpayment had at least a partial influence on which serious adverse events required reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many states use the collected data on HACs and other events for quality improvement initiatives and to provide greater transparency through public reporting. More work and research is needed to develop a national reporting system template that has standard definitions, methodology, and reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4288371/pdf/mmrr2014-004-04-a04.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.004.04.a04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.004.04.a04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:在美国,发生在医院的严重不良事件是可预防死亡的主要原因。许多州都有监测和公开报告严重不良事件的报告系统,这属于医疗保险的医院获得性疾病(HACs)的一部分。目的:确定和描述各州的努力,以及联邦倡议的支持作用,以跟踪和报告HACs和其他严重不良事件。数据来源:关于HACs和其他严重不良事件的州和联邦报告、数据库和政策的文件审查;与州卫生部门官员和患者安全组织负责人进行半结构化的电话采访。结果:32个州和哥伦比亚特区(D.C.)跟踪至少一个医疗保健HAC。五个州几乎收集了所有10个医疗保险HACs(9-10)。18个州和华盛顿特区通过以州为基础的报告系统和疾病控制中心国家医疗保健安全网络(NHSN)来追踪医疗保健相关感染(HAI)。对于严重的不良事件,大多数州部分或全部采用了国家质量论坛的严重报告事件。对于医疗保健机构,30个州和华盛顿特区要求通过国家健康保险网络进行报告。接受采访的各州报告说,医疗保险对不付款的HACs的选择至少对需要报告的严重不良事件有部分影响。结论:许多州将收集到的HACs和其他事件的数据用于质量改进计划,并通过公开报告提供更大的透明度。需要开展更多的工作和研究,以制定具有标准定义、方法和报告的国家报告系统模板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Monitoring and reporting hospital-acquired conditions: a federalist approach.

Monitoring and reporting hospital-acquired conditions: a federalist approach.

Monitoring and reporting hospital-acquired conditions: a federalist approach.

Background: Serious adverse events that occur in hospitals rank as a leading cause of preventable death in the United States. Many states operate reporting systems to monitor and publicly report serious adverse events, a subset that falls under Medicare's Hospital-Acquired Conditions (HACs).

Purposes: Identify and describe state efforts, and the supporting role of federal initiatives, to track and report HACs and other serious adverse events.

Data sources: Document review of state and federal reports, databases, and policies for HACs and other serious adverse events; conduct semi-structured telephone interviews with state health department officials and directors of patient safety organizations.

Results: Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia (D.C.) track at least one Medicare HAC. Five states collect nearly all ten Medicare HACs (9-10). Eighteen states and D.C. track events through both a state-based reporting system and the Centers for Disease Control National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) for health-care associated infections (HAI). For serious adverse events, most states either partially or fully adopted the National Quality Forum's Serious Reportable Events. For HAIs, thirty states and D.C. mandate reporting through NHSN. States interviewed reported that Medicare's choice of HACs for nonpayment had at least a partial influence on which serious adverse events required reporting.

Conclusions: Many states use the collected data on HACs and other events for quality improvement initiatives and to provide greater transparency through public reporting. More work and research is needed to develop a national reporting system template that has standard definitions, methodology, and reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信