Richard K Zimmerman, Charles R Rinaldo, Mary Patricia Nowalk, G K Balasubramani, Mark G Thompson, Arlene Bullotta, Michael Susick, Stephen Wisniewski
{"title":"两种PCR方法检测流感病毒感染。","authors":"Richard K Zimmerman, Charles R Rinaldo, Mary Patricia Nowalk, G K Balasubramani, Mark G Thompson, Arlene Bullotta, Michael Susick, Stephen Wisniewski","doi":"10.1155/2014/274679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid, accurate, and cost-effective methods to identify the cause of respiratory tract infections are needed to maximize clinical benefit. Outpatients with acute respiratory illness were tested for influenza using a singleplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (SRT-PCR) method. A multiplex RT-PCR (MRT-PCR) method tested for influenza and 17 other viruses and was compared with SRT-PCR using chi-square tests. Among 935 patients, 335 (36%) tested positive for influenza A and influenza B using SRT-PCR. Using MRT-PCR, 320 (34.2%) tested positive for influenza A and influenza B. This study supports MRT-PCR as a comparable method for detecting influenza among patients seeking outpatient care for acute respiratory illnesses. </p>","PeriodicalId":7473,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Virology","volume":"2014 ","pages":"274679"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/274679","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of influenza virus infection using two PCR methods.\",\"authors\":\"Richard K Zimmerman, Charles R Rinaldo, Mary Patricia Nowalk, G K Balasubramani, Mark G Thompson, Arlene Bullotta, Michael Susick, Stephen Wisniewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/274679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rapid, accurate, and cost-effective methods to identify the cause of respiratory tract infections are needed to maximize clinical benefit. Outpatients with acute respiratory illness were tested for influenza using a singleplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (SRT-PCR) method. A multiplex RT-PCR (MRT-PCR) method tested for influenza and 17 other viruses and was compared with SRT-PCR using chi-square tests. Among 935 patients, 335 (36%) tested positive for influenza A and influenza B using SRT-PCR. Using MRT-PCR, 320 (34.2%) tested positive for influenza A and influenza B. This study supports MRT-PCR as a comparable method for detecting influenza among patients seeking outpatient care for acute respiratory illnesses. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Virology\",\"volume\":\"2014 \",\"pages\":\"274679\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/274679\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/274679\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/274679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Detection of influenza virus infection using two PCR methods.
Rapid, accurate, and cost-effective methods to identify the cause of respiratory tract infections are needed to maximize clinical benefit. Outpatients with acute respiratory illness were tested for influenza using a singleplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (SRT-PCR) method. A multiplex RT-PCR (MRT-PCR) method tested for influenza and 17 other viruses and was compared with SRT-PCR using chi-square tests. Among 935 patients, 335 (36%) tested positive for influenza A and influenza B using SRT-PCR. Using MRT-PCR, 320 (34.2%) tested positive for influenza A and influenza B. This study supports MRT-PCR as a comparable method for detecting influenza among patients seeking outpatient care for acute respiratory illnesses.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
