制定和验证一份表格,以帮助决定限制或停止紧急治疗

A. Chirac , G. David , N. Rieg , A.-M. Schott-Pethelaz , J. Bohe , F. Carpentier , X. Jacob , W. Rhondali , M. Filbet
{"title":"制定和验证一份表格,以帮助决定限制或停止紧急治疗","authors":"A. Chirac ,&nbsp;G. David ,&nbsp;N. Rieg ,&nbsp;A.-M. Schott-Pethelaz ,&nbsp;J. Bohe ,&nbsp;F. Carpentier ,&nbsp;X. Jacob ,&nbsp;W. Rhondali ,&nbsp;M. Filbet","doi":"10.1016/j.annfar.2014.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Active treatment withholding and withdrawing decisions in the emergency room (ER) must be taken collegially according to ethical and juridical statements. Specific tools can support this process and our main goal was to create and validate such a tool.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We created a first version of a tool to help for treatment withholding and withdrawing decisions inspired by similar documents from literature. Every item of this tool was then assessed by a group of experts (ER physicians and nurses) using the Delphi method to reach a consensus.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-four experts from eleven ER (academic, regional centre) were included and participate to the first round and twenty-seven to the second round. From the eighty-two-item tool, sixty-five items reach a consensus during these two rounds and were kept to constitute the final version of the tool.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We have been able to create a tool to help for treatment withholding and withdrawing decisions adapted to the guidelines for end of life patient's management in the ER. This tool has been validated using a Delphi method by a group of experts from different centres. This multicentre validation will help for the diffusion and use of this tool in the different ER of the Rhône-Alpes region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7913,"journal":{"name":"Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation","volume":"33 11","pages":"Pages 555-562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.annfar.2014.09.004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Élaboration et validation d’une fiche d’aide à la décision de limitation ou d’arrêt des traitements aux urgences\",\"authors\":\"A. Chirac ,&nbsp;G. David ,&nbsp;N. Rieg ,&nbsp;A.-M. Schott-Pethelaz ,&nbsp;J. Bohe ,&nbsp;F. Carpentier ,&nbsp;X. Jacob ,&nbsp;W. Rhondali ,&nbsp;M. Filbet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annfar.2014.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Active treatment withholding and withdrawing decisions in the emergency room (ER) must be taken collegially according to ethical and juridical statements. Specific tools can support this process and our main goal was to create and validate such a tool.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We created a first version of a tool to help for treatment withholding and withdrawing decisions inspired by similar documents from literature. Every item of this tool was then assessed by a group of experts (ER physicians and nurses) using the Delphi method to reach a consensus.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-four experts from eleven ER (academic, regional centre) were included and participate to the first round and twenty-seven to the second round. From the eighty-two-item tool, sixty-five items reach a consensus during these two rounds and were kept to constitute the final version of the tool.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We have been able to create a tool to help for treatment withholding and withdrawing decisions adapted to the guidelines for end of life patient's management in the ER. This tool has been validated using a Delphi method by a group of experts from different centres. This multicentre validation will help for the diffusion and use of this tool in the different ER of the Rhône-Alpes region.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation\",\"volume\":\"33 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 555-562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.annfar.2014.09.004\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0750765814011204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0750765814011204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:在急诊室(ER),积极治疗的中止和退出决定必须根据伦理和法律声明进行合议。特定的工具可以支持这个过程,我们的主要目标是创建并验证这样的工具。方法受文献中类似文献的启发,我们创建了第一个版本的工具,以帮助治疗的保留和退出决策。然后由一组专家(急诊室医生和护士)使用德尔菲法对该工具的每个项目进行评估,以达成共识。结果11家研究机构(学术、区域中心)的34名专家参加了第一轮评审,27名专家参加了第二轮评审。从82个项目的工具中,65个项目在这两轮中达成共识,并被保留以构成工具的最终版本。结论:我们已经能够创建一个工具,以帮助治疗的保留和撤销决定适应指导方针的临终病人的管理在急诊室。该工具已由来自不同中心的一组专家使用德尔菲法进行了验证。这种多中心验证将有助于在Rhône-Alpes区域的不同ER中扩散和使用该工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Élaboration et validation d’une fiche d’aide à la décision de limitation ou d’arrêt des traitements aux urgences

Objectives

Active treatment withholding and withdrawing decisions in the emergency room (ER) must be taken collegially according to ethical and juridical statements. Specific tools can support this process and our main goal was to create and validate such a tool.

Method

We created a first version of a tool to help for treatment withholding and withdrawing decisions inspired by similar documents from literature. Every item of this tool was then assessed by a group of experts (ER physicians and nurses) using the Delphi method to reach a consensus.

Results

Thirty-four experts from eleven ER (academic, regional centre) were included and participate to the first round and twenty-seven to the second round. From the eighty-two-item tool, sixty-five items reach a consensus during these two rounds and were kept to constitute the final version of the tool.

Conclusion

We have been able to create a tool to help for treatment withholding and withdrawing decisions adapted to the guidelines for end of life patient's management in the ER. This tool has been validated using a Delphi method by a group of experts from different centres. This multicentre validation will help for the diffusion and use of this tool in the different ER of the Rhône-Alpes region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信