解读方法——误解、承诺和未来的挑战。

ALTEX Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI:10.14573/altex.1410071
Grace Patlewicz, Nicholas Ball, Richard A Becker, Ewan D Booth, Mark T D Cronin, Dinant Kroese, David Steup, Ben van Ravenzwaay, Thomas Hartung
{"title":"解读方法——误解、承诺和未来的挑战。","authors":"Grace Patlewicz,&nbsp;Nicholas Ball,&nbsp;Richard A Becker,&nbsp;Ewan D Booth,&nbsp;Mark T D Cronin,&nbsp;Dinant Kroese,&nbsp;David Steup,&nbsp;Ben van Ravenzwaay,&nbsp;Thomas Hartung","doi":"10.14573/altex.1410071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Read-across is a data gap filling technique used within category and analogue approaches. It has been utilized as an alternative approach to address information requirements under various past and present regulatory programs such as the OECD High Production Volume Programme as well as the EU's Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and restriction of CHemicals (REACH) regulation. Although read-across raises a number of expectations, many misconceptions still remain around what it truly represents; how to address its associated justification in a robust and scientifically credible manner; what challenges/issues exist in terms of its application and acceptance; and what future efforts are needed to resolve them. In terms of future enhancements, read-across is likely to embrace more biologically-orientated approaches consistent with the Toxicity in the 21st Century vision (Tox-21c). This Food for Thought article, which is notably not a consensus report, aims to discuss a number of these aspects and, in doing so, to raise awareness of the ongoing efforts and activities to enhance read-across. It also intends to set the agenda for a CAAT read-across initiative in 2014-2015 to facilitate the proper use of this technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":520550,"journal":{"name":"ALTEX","volume":" ","pages":"387-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"90","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Read-across approaches--misconceptions, promises and challenges ahead.\",\"authors\":\"Grace Patlewicz,&nbsp;Nicholas Ball,&nbsp;Richard A Becker,&nbsp;Ewan D Booth,&nbsp;Mark T D Cronin,&nbsp;Dinant Kroese,&nbsp;David Steup,&nbsp;Ben van Ravenzwaay,&nbsp;Thomas Hartung\",\"doi\":\"10.14573/altex.1410071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Read-across is a data gap filling technique used within category and analogue approaches. It has been utilized as an alternative approach to address information requirements under various past and present regulatory programs such as the OECD High Production Volume Programme as well as the EU's Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and restriction of CHemicals (REACH) regulation. Although read-across raises a number of expectations, many misconceptions still remain around what it truly represents; how to address its associated justification in a robust and scientifically credible manner; what challenges/issues exist in terms of its application and acceptance; and what future efforts are needed to resolve them. In terms of future enhancements, read-across is likely to embrace more biologically-orientated approaches consistent with the Toxicity in the 21st Century vision (Tox-21c). This Food for Thought article, which is notably not a consensus report, aims to discuss a number of these aspects and, in doing so, to raise awareness of the ongoing efforts and activities to enhance read-across. It also intends to set the agenda for a CAAT read-across initiative in 2014-2015 to facilitate the proper use of this technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ALTEX\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"387-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"90\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ALTEX\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1410071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ALTEX","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1410071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 90

摘要

跨读是一种在分类和模拟方法中使用的数据缺口填充技术。它已被用作满足各种过去和现在的监管计划(如经合组织高产量计划以及欧盟的化学品注册、评估、授权和限制(REACH)法规)的信息要求的替代方法。尽管read-across提出了许多期望,但关于它真正代表什么仍然存在许多误解;如何以有力和科学可信的方式解决其相关理由;在应用和接受方面存在哪些挑战/问题;以及未来需要怎样的努力来解决这些问题。就未来的增强而言,跨读可能会采用更多以生物学为导向的方法,与21世纪愿景中的毒性(x-21c)相一致。这篇思想食粮的文章,显然不是一份共识报告,旨在讨论其中的一些方面,并通过这样做,提高人们对正在进行的努力和活动的认识,以加强阅读。它还打算为2014-2015年CAAT跨读倡议制定议程,以促进该技术的正确使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Read-across approaches--misconceptions, promises and challenges ahead.

Read-across is a data gap filling technique used within category and analogue approaches. It has been utilized as an alternative approach to address information requirements under various past and present regulatory programs such as the OECD High Production Volume Programme as well as the EU's Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and restriction of CHemicals (REACH) regulation. Although read-across raises a number of expectations, many misconceptions still remain around what it truly represents; how to address its associated justification in a robust and scientifically credible manner; what challenges/issues exist in terms of its application and acceptance; and what future efforts are needed to resolve them. In terms of future enhancements, read-across is likely to embrace more biologically-orientated approaches consistent with the Toxicity in the 21st Century vision (Tox-21c). This Food for Thought article, which is notably not a consensus report, aims to discuss a number of these aspects and, in doing so, to raise awareness of the ongoing efforts and activities to enhance read-across. It also intends to set the agenda for a CAAT read-across initiative in 2014-2015 to facilitate the proper use of this technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信