中能量重离子碰撞输运模型比较研究

IF 14.5 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 PHYSICS, NUCLEAR
Hermann Wolter , Maria Colonna , Dan Cozma , Pawel Danielewicz , Che Ming Ko , Rohit Kumar , Akira Ono , ManYee Betty Tsang , Jun Xu , Ying-Xun Zhang , Elena Bratkovskaya , Zhao-Qing Feng , Theodoros Gaitanos , Arnaud Le Fèvre , Natsumi Ikeno , Youngman Kim , Swagata Mallik , Paolo Napolitani , Dmytro Oliinychenko , Tatsuhiko Ogawa , Wen-Jie Xie
{"title":"中能量重离子碰撞输运模型比较研究","authors":"Hermann Wolter ,&nbsp;Maria Colonna ,&nbsp;Dan Cozma ,&nbsp;Pawel Danielewicz ,&nbsp;Che Ming Ko ,&nbsp;Rohit Kumar ,&nbsp;Akira Ono ,&nbsp;ManYee Betty Tsang ,&nbsp;Jun Xu ,&nbsp;Ying-Xun Zhang ,&nbsp;Elena Bratkovskaya ,&nbsp;Zhao-Qing Feng ,&nbsp;Theodoros Gaitanos ,&nbsp;Arnaud Le Fèvre ,&nbsp;Natsumi Ikeno ,&nbsp;Youngman Kim ,&nbsp;Swagata Mallik ,&nbsp;Paolo Napolitani ,&nbsp;Dmytro Oliinychenko ,&nbsp;Tatsuhiko Ogawa ,&nbsp;Wen-Jie Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Transport models are the main method to obtain physics information on the nuclear </span>equation of state and in-medium properties of particles from low to relativistic-energy heavy-ion collisions. The Transport Model Evaluation Project (TMEP) has been pursued to test the robustness of transport model predictions in reaching consistent conclusions from the same type of physical model. To this end, calculations under controlled conditions of physical input and set-up were performed with various participating codes. These included both calculations of nuclear matter in a box with </span>periodic boundary conditions<span>, which test separately selected ingredients of a transport code, and more realistic calculations of heavy-ion collisions. Over the years, six studies have been performed within this project. In this intermediate review, we summarize and discuss the present status of the project. We also provide condensed descriptions of the 26 participating codes, which contributed to some part of the project. These include the major codes in use today. After a compact description of the underlying transport approaches, we review the main results of the studies completed so far. They show, that in box calculations the differences between the codes can be well understood and a convergence of the results can be reached. These studies also highlight the systematic differences between the two families of transport codes, known under the names of Boltzmann–Uehling–Uhlenbeck (BUU) and Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) type codes. However, when the codes were compared in full heavy-ion collisions using different physical models, as recently for pion production, they still yielded substantially different results. This calls for further comparisons of heavy-ion collisions with controlled models and of box comparisons of important ingredients, like momentum-dependent fields, which are currently underway. Our evaluation studies often indicate improved strategies in performing transport simulations and thus can provide guidance to code developers. Results of transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions from a given code will have more significance if the code can be validated against benchmark calculations such as the ones summarized in this review.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":412,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":14.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transport model comparison studies of intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions\",\"authors\":\"Hermann Wolter ,&nbsp;Maria Colonna ,&nbsp;Dan Cozma ,&nbsp;Pawel Danielewicz ,&nbsp;Che Ming Ko ,&nbsp;Rohit Kumar ,&nbsp;Akira Ono ,&nbsp;ManYee Betty Tsang ,&nbsp;Jun Xu ,&nbsp;Ying-Xun Zhang ,&nbsp;Elena Bratkovskaya ,&nbsp;Zhao-Qing Feng ,&nbsp;Theodoros Gaitanos ,&nbsp;Arnaud Le Fèvre ,&nbsp;Natsumi Ikeno ,&nbsp;Youngman Kim ,&nbsp;Swagata Mallik ,&nbsp;Paolo Napolitani ,&nbsp;Dmytro Oliinychenko ,&nbsp;Tatsuhiko Ogawa ,&nbsp;Wen-Jie Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Transport models are the main method to obtain physics information on the nuclear </span>equation of state and in-medium properties of particles from low to relativistic-energy heavy-ion collisions. The Transport Model Evaluation Project (TMEP) has been pursued to test the robustness of transport model predictions in reaching consistent conclusions from the same type of physical model. To this end, calculations under controlled conditions of physical input and set-up were performed with various participating codes. These included both calculations of nuclear matter in a box with </span>periodic boundary conditions<span>, which test separately selected ingredients of a transport code, and more realistic calculations of heavy-ion collisions. Over the years, six studies have been performed within this project. In this intermediate review, we summarize and discuss the present status of the project. We also provide condensed descriptions of the 26 participating codes, which contributed to some part of the project. These include the major codes in use today. After a compact description of the underlying transport approaches, we review the main results of the studies completed so far. They show, that in box calculations the differences between the codes can be well understood and a convergence of the results can be reached. These studies also highlight the systematic differences between the two families of transport codes, known under the names of Boltzmann–Uehling–Uhlenbeck (BUU) and Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) type codes. However, when the codes were compared in full heavy-ion collisions using different physical models, as recently for pion production, they still yielded substantially different results. This calls for further comparisons of heavy-ion collisions with controlled models and of box comparisons of important ingredients, like momentum-dependent fields, which are currently underway. Our evaluation studies often indicate improved strategies in performing transport simulations and thus can provide guidance to code developers. Results of transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions from a given code will have more significance if the code can be validated against benchmark calculations such as the ones summarized in this review.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641022000230\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641022000230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

输运模型是获取低能量到相对论能量重离子碰撞中核态方程和粒子中介质性质物理信息的主要方法。运输模式评估项目(TMEP)旨在检验运输模式预测的稳健性,以从同一类型的物理模式中得出一致的结论。为此,在物理输入和设置的受控条件下,使用各种参与代码进行计算。其中包括在一个具有周期性边界条件的盒子中计算核物质,分别测试传输代码的选定成分,以及更实际的重离子碰撞计算。多年来,在这个项目中进行了六项研究。在这篇中间综述中,我们总结和讨论了项目的现状。我们还提供了26个参与代码的简要描述,它们对项目的某些部分做出了贡献。其中包括目前使用的主要代码。在简要描述了潜在的运输途径之后,我们回顾了迄今为止完成的研究的主要结果。他们表明,在方框计算中,代码之间的差异可以很好地理解,并且可以达到结果的收敛。这些研究还强调了两类传输码之间的系统差异,这两类传输码分别被称为Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck (BUU)和量子分子动力学(QMD)类型码。然而,当使用不同的物理模型在完全重离子碰撞中比较这些代码时,就像最近的介子产生一样,它们仍然产生了本质上不同的结果。这就需要用控制模型对重离子碰撞进行进一步的比较,并对重要成分(如动量依赖场)进行盒子比较,目前正在进行中。我们的评估研究经常指出执行传输模拟的改进策略,因此可以为代码开发人员提供指导。如果代码能够通过基准计算(如本文总结的计算)进行验证,那么来自给定代码的重离子碰撞输运模拟结果将具有更大的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transport model comparison studies of intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions

Transport models are the main method to obtain physics information on the nuclear equation of state and in-medium properties of particles from low to relativistic-energy heavy-ion collisions. The Transport Model Evaluation Project (TMEP) has been pursued to test the robustness of transport model predictions in reaching consistent conclusions from the same type of physical model. To this end, calculations under controlled conditions of physical input and set-up were performed with various participating codes. These included both calculations of nuclear matter in a box with periodic boundary conditions, which test separately selected ingredients of a transport code, and more realistic calculations of heavy-ion collisions. Over the years, six studies have been performed within this project. In this intermediate review, we summarize and discuss the present status of the project. We also provide condensed descriptions of the 26 participating codes, which contributed to some part of the project. These include the major codes in use today. After a compact description of the underlying transport approaches, we review the main results of the studies completed so far. They show, that in box calculations the differences between the codes can be well understood and a convergence of the results can be reached. These studies also highlight the systematic differences between the two families of transport codes, known under the names of Boltzmann–Uehling–Uhlenbeck (BUU) and Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) type codes. However, when the codes were compared in full heavy-ion collisions using different physical models, as recently for pion production, they still yielded substantially different results. This calls for further comparisons of heavy-ion collisions with controlled models and of box comparisons of important ingredients, like momentum-dependent fields, which are currently underway. Our evaluation studies often indicate improved strategies in performing transport simulations and thus can provide guidance to code developers. Results of transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions from a given code will have more significance if the code can be validated against benchmark calculations such as the ones summarized in this review.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics
Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 物理-物理:核物理
CiteScore
24.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
41
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Taking the format of four issues per year, the journal Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics aims to discuss new developments in the field at a level suitable for the general nuclear and particle physicist and, in greater technical depth, to explore the most important advances in these areas. Most of the articles will be in one of the fields of nuclear physics, hadron physics, heavy ion physics, particle physics, as well as astrophysics and cosmology. A particular effort is made to treat topics of an interface type for which both particle and nuclear physics are important. Related topics such as detector physics, accelerator physics or the application of nuclear physics in the medical and archaeological fields will also be treated from time to time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信