Ronda F Greaves, Gerald A Woollard, Kirsten E Hoad, Trevor A Walmsley, Lambro A Johnson, Scott Briscoe, Sabrina Koetsier, Tamantha Harrower, Janice P Gill
{"title":"实验室医学最佳实践指南:血液中的维生素 a、e 和类胡萝卜素。","authors":"Ronda F Greaves, Gerald A Woollard, Kirsten E Hoad, Trevor A Walmsley, Lambro A Johnson, Scott Briscoe, Sabrina Koetsier, Tamantha Harrower, Janice P Gill","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite apparent method similarities between laboratories there appear to be confounding factors inhibiting uniform reporting and standardisation of vitamin assays. The Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists (AACB) Vitamins Working Party, in conjunction with The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs, has formulated a guideline to improve performance, reproducibility and accuracy of fat-soluble vitamin results. The aim of the guideline is to identify critical pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical components of the analysis of vitamins A, E and carotenoids in blood to promote best practice and harmonisation. This best practice guideline has been developed with reference to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) \"Laboratory Medicine Best Practices: Developing an Evidence-Based Review and Evaluation Process\". The CDC document cites an evaluation framework for generating best practice recommendations that are specific to laboratory medicine. These 50 recommendations proposed herein, were generated from a comprehensive literature search and the extensive combined experience of the AACB Vitamins Working Party members. They were formulated based on comparison between an impact assessment rating and strength of evidence and were classified as either: (1) strongly recommend, (2) recommend, (3) no recommendation for or against, or (4) recommend against. These best practice recommendations represent the consensus views, in association with peer reviewed evidence of the AACB Vitamins Working Party, towards best practice for the collection, analysis and interpretation of vitamins A, E and carotenoids in blood. </p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"35 2","pages":"81-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4159783/pdf/cbr-35-81.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laboratory medicine best practice guideline: vitamins a, e and the carotenoids in blood.\",\"authors\":\"Ronda F Greaves, Gerald A Woollard, Kirsten E Hoad, Trevor A Walmsley, Lambro A Johnson, Scott Briscoe, Sabrina Koetsier, Tamantha Harrower, Janice P Gill\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite apparent method similarities between laboratories there appear to be confounding factors inhibiting uniform reporting and standardisation of vitamin assays. The Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists (AACB) Vitamins Working Party, in conjunction with The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs, has formulated a guideline to improve performance, reproducibility and accuracy of fat-soluble vitamin results. The aim of the guideline is to identify critical pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical components of the analysis of vitamins A, E and carotenoids in blood to promote best practice and harmonisation. This best practice guideline has been developed with reference to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) \\\"Laboratory Medicine Best Practices: Developing an Evidence-Based Review and Evaluation Process\\\". The CDC document cites an evaluation framework for generating best practice recommendations that are specific to laboratory medicine. These 50 recommendations proposed herein, were generated from a comprehensive literature search and the extensive combined experience of the AACB Vitamins Working Party members. They were formulated based on comparison between an impact assessment rating and strength of evidence and were classified as either: (1) strongly recommend, (2) recommend, (3) no recommendation for or against, or (4) recommend against. These best practice recommendations represent the consensus views, in association with peer reviewed evidence of the AACB Vitamins Working Party, towards best practice for the collection, analysis and interpretation of vitamins A, E and carotenoids in blood. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Biochemist Reviews\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"81-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4159783/pdf/cbr-35-81.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Biochemist Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管实验室之间的检测方法明显相似,但似乎仍有一些干扰因素阻碍了维生素检测的统一报告和标准化。澳大拉西亚临床生物化学家协会(AACB)维生素工作组与澳大拉西亚皇家病理学家学院质量保证计划(The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs)联合制定了一项指南,以提高脂溶性维生素检测结果的性能、可重复性和准确性。该指南旨在确定血液中维生素 A、E 和类胡萝卜素分析的关键分析前、分析中和分析后要素,以促进最佳实践和协调。本最佳实践指南是参照美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)的 "实验室医学最佳实践 "制定的:制定以证据为基础的审查和评估程序"。CDC 文件引用了一个评估框架,用于生成实验室医学专用的最佳实践建议。本文提出的这 50 项建议,是通过全面的文献检索和 AACB 维生素工作小组成员丰富的综合经验得出的。这些建议是根据影响评估等级和证据强度之间的比较制定的,并分为:(1) 强烈推荐,(2) 推荐,(3) 不推荐或反对,或 (4) 建议反对。这些最佳实践建议代表了 AACB 维生素工作小组结合同行评审的证据,就血液中维生素 A、E 和类胡萝卜素的收集、分析和解释的最佳实践达成的共识。
Laboratory medicine best practice guideline: vitamins a, e and the carotenoids in blood.
Despite apparent method similarities between laboratories there appear to be confounding factors inhibiting uniform reporting and standardisation of vitamin assays. The Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists (AACB) Vitamins Working Party, in conjunction with The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs, has formulated a guideline to improve performance, reproducibility and accuracy of fat-soluble vitamin results. The aim of the guideline is to identify critical pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical components of the analysis of vitamins A, E and carotenoids in blood to promote best practice and harmonisation. This best practice guideline has been developed with reference to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) "Laboratory Medicine Best Practices: Developing an Evidence-Based Review and Evaluation Process". The CDC document cites an evaluation framework for generating best practice recommendations that are specific to laboratory medicine. These 50 recommendations proposed herein, were generated from a comprehensive literature search and the extensive combined experience of the AACB Vitamins Working Party members. They were formulated based on comparison between an impact assessment rating and strength of evidence and were classified as either: (1) strongly recommend, (2) recommend, (3) no recommendation for or against, or (4) recommend against. These best practice recommendations represent the consensus views, in association with peer reviewed evidence of the AACB Vitamins Working Party, towards best practice for the collection, analysis and interpretation of vitamins A, E and carotenoids in blood.