激光多普勒技术在烧伤深度评估中的发展综述。

Plastic Surgery International Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-08-07 DOI:10.1155/2014/621792
Manaf Khatib, Shehab Jabir, Edmund Fitzgerald O'Connor, Bruce Philp
{"title":"激光多普勒技术在烧伤深度评估中的发展综述。","authors":"Manaf Khatib,&nbsp;Shehab Jabir,&nbsp;Edmund Fitzgerald O'Connor,&nbsp;Bruce Philp","doi":"10.1155/2014/621792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aims. The introduction of laser Doppler (LD) techniques to assess burn depth has revolutionized the treatment of burns of indeterminate depth. This paper will systematically review studies related to these two techniques and trace their evolution. At the same time we hope to highlight current controversies and areas where further research is necessary with regard to LD imaging (LDI) techniques. Methods. A systematic search for relevant literature was carried out on PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Key search terms included the following: \"Laser Doppler imaging,\" \"laser Doppler flow,\" and \"burn depth.\" Results. A total of 53 studies were identified. Twenty-six studies which met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included in the review. Conclusions. The numerous advantages of LDI over those of LD flowmetry have resulted in the former technique superseding the latter one. Despite the presence of alternative burn depth assessment techniques, LDI remains the most favoured. Various newer LDI machines with increasingly sophisticated methods of assessing burn depth have been introduced throughout the years. However, factors such as cost effectiveness, scanning of topographically inconsistent areas of the body, and skewing of results due to tattoos, peripheral vascular disease, and anaemia continue to be sighted as obstacles to LDI which require further research. </p>","PeriodicalId":20105,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery International","volume":"2014 ","pages":"621792"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/621792","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of the evolution of laser Doppler techniques in burn depth assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Manaf Khatib,&nbsp;Shehab Jabir,&nbsp;Edmund Fitzgerald O'Connor,&nbsp;Bruce Philp\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/621792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aims. The introduction of laser Doppler (LD) techniques to assess burn depth has revolutionized the treatment of burns of indeterminate depth. This paper will systematically review studies related to these two techniques and trace their evolution. At the same time we hope to highlight current controversies and areas where further research is necessary with regard to LD imaging (LDI) techniques. Methods. A systematic search for relevant literature was carried out on PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Key search terms included the following: \\\"Laser Doppler imaging,\\\" \\\"laser Doppler flow,\\\" and \\\"burn depth.\\\" Results. A total of 53 studies were identified. Twenty-six studies which met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included in the review. Conclusions. The numerous advantages of LDI over those of LD flowmetry have resulted in the former technique superseding the latter one. Despite the presence of alternative burn depth assessment techniques, LDI remains the most favoured. Various newer LDI machines with increasingly sophisticated methods of assessing burn depth have been introduced throughout the years. However, factors such as cost effectiveness, scanning of topographically inconsistent areas of the body, and skewing of results due to tattoos, peripheral vascular disease, and anaemia continue to be sighted as obstacles to LDI which require further research. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic Surgery International\",\"volume\":\"2014 \",\"pages\":\"621792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/621792\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic Surgery International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/621792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/621792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

目标引入激光多普勒(LD)技术来评估烧伤深度已经彻底改变了治疗深度不确定的烧伤。本文将系统地回顾与这两种技术相关的研究,并追溯其演变过程。同时,我们希望强调当前的争议和需要进一步研究的LD成像(LDI)技术领域。方法。在PubMed、Medline、EMBASE和Google Scholar上系统检索相关文献。关键搜索词包括:“激光多普勒成像”、“激光多普勒流”和“烧伤深度”。结果。总共确定了53项研究。符合纳入/排除标准的26项研究被纳入本综述。结论。LDI相对于LD流量法的许多优点使得前者技术取代了后者。尽管存在其他烧伤深度评估技术,LDI仍然是最受欢迎的。近年来,各种较新的LDI机器采用了越来越复杂的方法来评估烧伤深度。然而,诸如成本效益、身体地形不一致区域的扫描、纹身、周围血管疾病和贫血导致的结果偏差等因素仍然被视为LDI的障碍,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A systematic review of the evolution of laser Doppler techniques in burn depth assessment.

A systematic review of the evolution of laser Doppler techniques in burn depth assessment.

A systematic review of the evolution of laser Doppler techniques in burn depth assessment.

Aims. The introduction of laser Doppler (LD) techniques to assess burn depth has revolutionized the treatment of burns of indeterminate depth. This paper will systematically review studies related to these two techniques and trace their evolution. At the same time we hope to highlight current controversies and areas where further research is necessary with regard to LD imaging (LDI) techniques. Methods. A systematic search for relevant literature was carried out on PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Key search terms included the following: "Laser Doppler imaging," "laser Doppler flow," and "burn depth." Results. A total of 53 studies were identified. Twenty-six studies which met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included in the review. Conclusions. The numerous advantages of LDI over those of LD flowmetry have resulted in the former technique superseding the latter one. Despite the presence of alternative burn depth assessment techniques, LDI remains the most favoured. Various newer LDI machines with increasingly sophisticated methods of assessing burn depth have been introduced throughout the years. However, factors such as cost effectiveness, scanning of topographically inconsistent areas of the body, and skewing of results due to tattoos, peripheral vascular disease, and anaemia continue to be sighted as obstacles to LDI which require further research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信