{"title":"从MCBS获取医疗档案中估计的曾经参加过医疗保险的人口。","authors":"Jason Petroski, David Ferraro, Adam Chu","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey's (MCBS) Access to Care (ATC) file is designed to provide timely access to information on the Medicare population, yet because of the survey's complex sampling design and expedited processing it is difficult to use the file to make both \"always-enrolled\" and \"ever-enrolled\" estimates on the Medicare population. In this study, we describe the ATC file and sample design, and we evaluate and review various alternatives for producing \"ever-enrolled\" estimates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created \"ever enrolled\" estimates for key variables in the MCBS using three separate approaches. We tested differences between the alternative approaches for statistical significance and show the relative magnitude of difference between approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Even when estimates derived from the different approaches were statistically different, the magnitude of the difference was often sufficiently small so as to result in little practical difference among the alternate approaches. However, when considering more than just the estimation method, there are advantages to using certain approaches over others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are several plausible approaches to achieving \"ever-enrolled\" estimates in the MCBS ATC file; however, the most straightforward approach appears to be implementation and usage of a new set of \"ever-enrolled\" weights for this file.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077701/pdf/mmrr2014-004-02-a05.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ever enrolled Medicare population estimates from the MCBS Access to Care files.\",\"authors\":\"Jason Petroski, David Ferraro, Adam Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey's (MCBS) Access to Care (ATC) file is designed to provide timely access to information on the Medicare population, yet because of the survey's complex sampling design and expedited processing it is difficult to use the file to make both \\\"always-enrolled\\\" and \\\"ever-enrolled\\\" estimates on the Medicare population. In this study, we describe the ATC file and sample design, and we evaluate and review various alternatives for producing \\\"ever-enrolled\\\" estimates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created \\\"ever enrolled\\\" estimates for key variables in the MCBS using three separate approaches. We tested differences between the alternative approaches for statistical significance and show the relative magnitude of difference between approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Even when estimates derived from the different approaches were statistically different, the magnitude of the difference was often sufficiently small so as to result in little practical difference among the alternate approaches. However, when considering more than just the estimation method, there are advantages to using certain approaches over others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are several plausible approaches to achieving \\\"ever-enrolled\\\" estimates in the MCBS ATC file; however, the most straightforward approach appears to be implementation and usage of a new set of \\\"ever-enrolled\\\" weights for this file.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077701/pdf/mmrr2014-004-02-a05.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ever enrolled Medicare population estimates from the MCBS Access to Care files.
Objective: The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey's (MCBS) Access to Care (ATC) file is designed to provide timely access to information on the Medicare population, yet because of the survey's complex sampling design and expedited processing it is difficult to use the file to make both "always-enrolled" and "ever-enrolled" estimates on the Medicare population. In this study, we describe the ATC file and sample design, and we evaluate and review various alternatives for producing "ever-enrolled" estimates.
Methods: We created "ever enrolled" estimates for key variables in the MCBS using three separate approaches. We tested differences between the alternative approaches for statistical significance and show the relative magnitude of difference between approaches.
Results: Even when estimates derived from the different approaches were statistically different, the magnitude of the difference was often sufficiently small so as to result in little practical difference among the alternate approaches. However, when considering more than just the estimation method, there are advantages to using certain approaches over others.
Conclusion: There are several plausible approaches to achieving "ever-enrolled" estimates in the MCBS ATC file; however, the most straightforward approach appears to be implementation and usage of a new set of "ever-enrolled" weights for this file.