从MCBS获取医疗档案中估计的曾经参加过医疗保险的人口。

Medicare & medicaid research review Pub Date : 2014-06-26 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a05
Jason Petroski, David Ferraro, Adam Chu
{"title":"从MCBS获取医疗档案中估计的曾经参加过医疗保险的人口。","authors":"Jason Petroski,&nbsp;David Ferraro,&nbsp;Adam Chu","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey's (MCBS) Access to Care (ATC) file is designed to provide timely access to information on the Medicare population, yet because of the survey's complex sampling design and expedited processing it is difficult to use the file to make both \"always-enrolled\" and \"ever-enrolled\" estimates on the Medicare population. In this study, we describe the ATC file and sample design, and we evaluate and review various alternatives for producing \"ever-enrolled\" estimates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created \"ever enrolled\" estimates for key variables in the MCBS using three separate approaches. We tested differences between the alternative approaches for statistical significance and show the relative magnitude of difference between approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Even when estimates derived from the different approaches were statistically different, the magnitude of the difference was often sufficiently small so as to result in little practical difference among the alternate approaches. However, when considering more than just the estimation method, there are advantages to using certain approaches over others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are several plausible approaches to achieving \"ever-enrolled\" estimates in the MCBS ATC file; however, the most straightforward approach appears to be implementation and usage of a new set of \"ever-enrolled\" weights for this file.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077701/pdf/mmrr2014-004-02-a05.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ever enrolled Medicare population estimates from the MCBS Access to Care files.\",\"authors\":\"Jason Petroski,&nbsp;David Ferraro,&nbsp;Adam Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey's (MCBS) Access to Care (ATC) file is designed to provide timely access to information on the Medicare population, yet because of the survey's complex sampling design and expedited processing it is difficult to use the file to make both \\\"always-enrolled\\\" and \\\"ever-enrolled\\\" estimates on the Medicare population. In this study, we describe the ATC file and sample design, and we evaluate and review various alternatives for producing \\\"ever-enrolled\\\" estimates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created \\\"ever enrolled\\\" estimates for key variables in the MCBS using three separate approaches. We tested differences between the alternative approaches for statistical significance and show the relative magnitude of difference between approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Even when estimates derived from the different approaches were statistically different, the magnitude of the difference was often sufficiently small so as to result in little practical difference among the alternate approaches. However, when considering more than just the estimation method, there are advantages to using certain approaches over others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are several plausible approaches to achieving \\\"ever-enrolled\\\" estimates in the MCBS ATC file; however, the most straightforward approach appears to be implementation and usage of a new set of \\\"ever-enrolled\\\" weights for this file.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4077701/pdf/mmrr2014-004-02-a05.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:医疗保险现行受益人调查(MCBS)获取医疗服务(ATC)文件旨在提供及时获取医疗保险人口信息的途径,但由于该调查的复杂抽样设计和快速处理,很难使用该文件对医疗保险人口进行“始终登记”和“一直登记”估计。在本研究中,我们描述了ATC文件和样本设计,并评估和审查了产生“永远登记”估计的各种替代方案。方法:我们使用三种不同的方法对MCBS中的关键变量进行了“曾经登记”估计。我们对不同方法之间的差异进行了统计显著性检验,并显示了不同方法之间差异的相对幅度。结果:即使从不同的方法中得出的估计在统计上不同,差异的幅度往往足够小,从而导致替代方法之间的实际差异很小。然而,当考虑到不仅仅是估计方法时,使用某些方法比其他方法更有优势。结论:有几种可行的方法来实现MCBS ATC文件中“一直登记”的估计;然而,最直接的方法似乎是为该文件实现和使用一组新的“一直登记”权重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ever enrolled Medicare population estimates from the MCBS Access to Care files.

Ever enrolled Medicare population estimates from the MCBS Access to Care files.

Ever enrolled Medicare population estimates from the MCBS Access to Care files.

Objective: The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey's (MCBS) Access to Care (ATC) file is designed to provide timely access to information on the Medicare population, yet because of the survey's complex sampling design and expedited processing it is difficult to use the file to make both "always-enrolled" and "ever-enrolled" estimates on the Medicare population. In this study, we describe the ATC file and sample design, and we evaluate and review various alternatives for producing "ever-enrolled" estimates.

Methods: We created "ever enrolled" estimates for key variables in the MCBS using three separate approaches. We tested differences between the alternative approaches for statistical significance and show the relative magnitude of difference between approaches.

Results: Even when estimates derived from the different approaches were statistically different, the magnitude of the difference was often sufficiently small so as to result in little practical difference among the alternate approaches. However, when considering more than just the estimation method, there are advantages to using certain approaches over others.

Conclusion: There are several plausible approaches to achieving "ever-enrolled" estimates in the MCBS ATC file; however, the most straightforward approach appears to be implementation and usage of a new set of "ever-enrolled" weights for this file.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信