老年患者的人工耳蜗植入:结果和比较。

A Rafferty, L Tapper, D Strachan, C Raine
{"title":"老年患者的人工耳蜗植入:结果和比较。","authors":"A Rafferty,&nbsp;L Tapper,&nbsp;D Strachan,&nbsp;C Raine","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A review of adults receiving cochlear implants (Cls) at the Yorkshire Cochlear Implant Service (YCIS) was performed to assess whether age affects use or outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of all patients over the age of 50 implanted and habilitated at the YCIS was undertaken. Outcome measures included quality of life (QoL) questionnaires and speech perception tests: CUNY sentences and BKB sentences. Comparisons were made between patients implanted age 50 to 59 (A), 60 to 69 (B) and 70 and over (C). Patients with English as a second language and those implanted for less than 9 months were excluded. Data was analysed using a repeated measure regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80 adults were included; A, 31; B, 29; C, 20. Significant improvements were seen in speech perception scores in all groups from pre-implant to 3 months. No statistically significant difference was found between the 3 groups in any outcome measure. QoL scores overall showed increased independence and greater participation in social activities with all patients feeling their implant had been successful.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Increased life expectancy and availability of cochlear implants (Cls) has led to greater numbers of older patients being eligible for implantation. Our results show improved speech perception and QoL outcomes in all groups. The lack of statistically significant differences between age groups supports the benefits of Cls in the older population. Older age should not be a discriminating factor in candidacy for cochlear implantation and referral of older patients to implant centres should be encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":76469,"journal":{"name":"Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie","volume":"134 3","pages":"119-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cochlear implantation in older patients: outcomes and comparisons.\",\"authors\":\"A Rafferty,&nbsp;L Tapper,&nbsp;D Strachan,&nbsp;C Raine\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A review of adults receiving cochlear implants (Cls) at the Yorkshire Cochlear Implant Service (YCIS) was performed to assess whether age affects use or outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of all patients over the age of 50 implanted and habilitated at the YCIS was undertaken. Outcome measures included quality of life (QoL) questionnaires and speech perception tests: CUNY sentences and BKB sentences. Comparisons were made between patients implanted age 50 to 59 (A), 60 to 69 (B) and 70 and over (C). Patients with English as a second language and those implanted for less than 9 months were excluded. Data was analysed using a repeated measure regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80 adults were included; A, 31; B, 29; C, 20. Significant improvements were seen in speech perception scores in all groups from pre-implant to 3 months. No statistically significant difference was found between the 3 groups in any outcome measure. QoL scores overall showed increased independence and greater participation in social activities with all patients feeling their implant had been successful.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Increased life expectancy and availability of cochlear implants (Cls) has led to greater numbers of older patients being eligible for implantation. Our results show improved speech perception and QoL outcomes in all groups. The lack of statistically significant differences between age groups supports the benefits of Cls in the older population. Older age should not be a discriminating factor in candidacy for cochlear implantation and referral of older patients to implant centres should be encouraged.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie\",\"volume\":\"134 3\",\"pages\":\"119-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对在约克郡人工耳蜗服务(YCIS)接受人工耳蜗植入(Cls)的成人进行回顾,以评估年龄是否影响使用或结果。方法:回顾性分析所有50岁以上在YCIS植入并康复的患者。结果测量包括生活质量(QoL)问卷和语音感知测试:CUNY句子和BKB句子。比较年龄为50 ~ 59岁(A)、60 ~ 69岁(B)和70岁及以上(C)的患者。排除以英语为第二语言的患者和植入时间少于9个月的患者。数据分析采用重复测量回归模型。结果:纳入80名成人;一个31岁;B, 29日;C, 20。从植入前到3个月,所有组的语音感知评分均有显著改善。三组间在任何结局指标上均无统计学差异。总体而言,生活质量评分显示,所有患者都觉得他们的植入物是成功的,他们的独立性和参与社会活动的程度都有所提高。讨论:预期寿命的增加和人工耳蜗(Cls)的可用性导致更多的老年患者有资格进行人工耳蜗植入。我们的结果显示,所有组的语音感知和生活质量结果都有所改善。年龄组之间没有统计学上的显著差异,这支持了Cls在老年人群中的益处。年龄不应成为人工耳蜗植入候选人的一个歧视性因素,应鼓励老年患者转介到人工耳蜗植入中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cochlear implantation in older patients: outcomes and comparisons.

Objectives: A review of adults receiving cochlear implants (Cls) at the Yorkshire Cochlear Implant Service (YCIS) was performed to assess whether age affects use or outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients over the age of 50 implanted and habilitated at the YCIS was undertaken. Outcome measures included quality of life (QoL) questionnaires and speech perception tests: CUNY sentences and BKB sentences. Comparisons were made between patients implanted age 50 to 59 (A), 60 to 69 (B) and 70 and over (C). Patients with English as a second language and those implanted for less than 9 months were excluded. Data was analysed using a repeated measure regression model.

Results: 80 adults were included; A, 31; B, 29; C, 20. Significant improvements were seen in speech perception scores in all groups from pre-implant to 3 months. No statistically significant difference was found between the 3 groups in any outcome measure. QoL scores overall showed increased independence and greater participation in social activities with all patients feeling their implant had been successful.

Discussion: Increased life expectancy and availability of cochlear implants (Cls) has led to greater numbers of older patients being eligible for implantation. Our results show improved speech perception and QoL outcomes in all groups. The lack of statistically significant differences between age groups supports the benefits of Cls in the older population. Older age should not be a discriminating factor in candidacy for cochlear implantation and referral of older patients to implant centres should be encouraged.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信