用人造螃蟹测试章鱼的捕食行为和健康状况。

ALTEX Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-06-12 DOI:10.14573/altex.1401282
Piero Amodio, Paul Andrews, Marinella Salemme, Giovanna Ponte, Graziano Fiorito
{"title":"用人造螃蟹测试章鱼的捕食行为和健康状况。","authors":"Piero Amodio,&nbsp;Paul Andrews,&nbsp;Marinella Salemme,&nbsp;Giovanna Ponte,&nbsp;Graziano Fiorito","doi":"10.14573/altex.1401282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The willingness of the cephalopod mollusc Octopus vulgaris to attack a live crab is traditionally used as a method to assess the overall health and welfare of octopuses in the laboratory. This method requires placing a crab in the home tank of an animal, measuring the time (latency) taken for the octopus to initiate an attack and withdrawing the crab immediately prior to capture. The same crab is commonly used to assess multiple octopuses as part of daily welfare assessment. Growing concern for the welfare of crustaceans and a review of all laboratory practices for the care and welfare of cephalopods following the inclusion of this taxon in 2010/63/EU prompted a study of the utility of an artificial crab to replace a live crab in the assessment of octopus health. On consecutive days O. vulgaris (N=21) were presented with a live, a dead or an artificial crab, and the latency to attack measured. Despite differences in the predatory performance towards the three different crab alternatives, octopuses readily attacked the artificial (and the dead) crab, showing that they can generalize and respond appropriately towards artificial prey. Researchers should consider using an artificial crab to replace the use of a live crab as part of the routine health assessment of O. vulgaris.</p>","PeriodicalId":520550,"journal":{"name":"ALTEX","volume":" ","pages":"494-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of artificial crabs for testing predatory behavior and health in the octopus.\",\"authors\":\"Piero Amodio,&nbsp;Paul Andrews,&nbsp;Marinella Salemme,&nbsp;Giovanna Ponte,&nbsp;Graziano Fiorito\",\"doi\":\"10.14573/altex.1401282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The willingness of the cephalopod mollusc Octopus vulgaris to attack a live crab is traditionally used as a method to assess the overall health and welfare of octopuses in the laboratory. This method requires placing a crab in the home tank of an animal, measuring the time (latency) taken for the octopus to initiate an attack and withdrawing the crab immediately prior to capture. The same crab is commonly used to assess multiple octopuses as part of daily welfare assessment. Growing concern for the welfare of crustaceans and a review of all laboratory practices for the care and welfare of cephalopods following the inclusion of this taxon in 2010/63/EU prompted a study of the utility of an artificial crab to replace a live crab in the assessment of octopus health. On consecutive days O. vulgaris (N=21) were presented with a live, a dead or an artificial crab, and the latency to attack measured. Despite differences in the predatory performance towards the three different crab alternatives, octopuses readily attacked the artificial (and the dead) crab, showing that they can generalize and respond appropriately towards artificial prey. Researchers should consider using an artificial crab to replace the use of a live crab as part of the routine health assessment of O. vulgaris.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ALTEX\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"494-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ALTEX\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1401282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ALTEX","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1401282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

在实验室中,头足类软体动物章鱼(Octopus vulgaris)攻击活蟹的意愿通常被用作评估章鱼整体健康和福利的一种方法。这种方法需要将一只螃蟹放在一只动物的家庭水箱中,测量章鱼发起攻击所需的时间(潜伏期),并在捕获之前立即将螃蟹取出。同一只螃蟹通常被用来评估多只章鱼,作为日常福利评估的一部分。在2010/63/EU将这一分类群纳入后,人们对甲壳类动物的福利日益关注,并对所有照料和福利头足类动物的实验室实践进行了审查,这促使人们对在评估章鱼健康时用人造蟹代替活蟹的效用进行了研究。连续d分别饲喂活蟹、死蟹和人工蟹,测定其攻击潜伏期。尽管章鱼对三种不同的螃蟹的捕食表现不同,但它们很容易攻击人造(和死)螃蟹,这表明它们可以对人造猎物进行概括和适当的反应。研究人员应考虑使用人工蟹代替活蟹作为普通野蟹常规健康评估的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of artificial crabs for testing predatory behavior and health in the octopus.

The willingness of the cephalopod mollusc Octopus vulgaris to attack a live crab is traditionally used as a method to assess the overall health and welfare of octopuses in the laboratory. This method requires placing a crab in the home tank of an animal, measuring the time (latency) taken for the octopus to initiate an attack and withdrawing the crab immediately prior to capture. The same crab is commonly used to assess multiple octopuses as part of daily welfare assessment. Growing concern for the welfare of crustaceans and a review of all laboratory practices for the care and welfare of cephalopods following the inclusion of this taxon in 2010/63/EU prompted a study of the utility of an artificial crab to replace a live crab in the assessment of octopus health. On consecutive days O. vulgaris (N=21) were presented with a live, a dead or an artificial crab, and the latency to attack measured. Despite differences in the predatory performance towards the three different crab alternatives, octopuses readily attacked the artificial (and the dead) crab, showing that they can generalize and respond appropriately towards artificial prey. Researchers should consider using an artificial crab to replace the use of a live crab as part of the routine health assessment of O. vulgaris.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信