数据在医疗补助管理性护理的医疗差距中的作用。

Medicare & medicaid research review Pub Date : 2012-11-05 eCollection Date: 2012-01-01 DOI:10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a02
David Moskowitz, Bruce Guthrie, Andrew B Bindman
{"title":"数据在医疗补助管理性护理的医疗差距中的作用。","authors":"David Moskowitz, Bruce Guthrie, Andrew B Bindman","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Affordable Care Act includes provisions to standardize the collection of data on health care quality that can be used to measure disparities. We conducted a qualitative study among leaders of Medicaid managed care plans, that currently have access to standardized quality data stratified by race and ethnicity, to learn how they use it to address disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 health plan leaders across 9 Medicaid managed care plans in California. We used purposive sampling to maximize heterogeneity in geography and plan type (e.g., non-profit, commercial). We performed a thematic analysis based on iterative coding by two investigators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 4 major themes. Improving overall quality was tightly linked to a focus on standardized metrics that are integral to meeting regulatory or financial incentives. However, reducing disparities was not driven by standardized data, but by a mix of factors. Data were frequently only examined by race and ethnicity when overall performance was low. Disparities were attributed to either individual choices or cultural and linguistic factors, with plans focusing interventions on recently immigrated groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While plans' efforts to address overall quality were often informed by standardized data, actions to reduce disparities were not, at least partly because there were few regulatory or financial incentives driving meaningful use of data on disparities. Standardized data, as envisaged by the Affordable Care Act, could become more useful for addressing disparities if they are combined with policies and regulations that promote health care equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"2 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4006475/pdf/mmrr2012-002-04-a02.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of data in health care disparities in Medicaid managed care.\",\"authors\":\"David Moskowitz, Bruce Guthrie, Andrew B Bindman\",\"doi\":\"10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Affordable Care Act includes provisions to standardize the collection of data on health care quality that can be used to measure disparities. We conducted a qualitative study among leaders of Medicaid managed care plans, that currently have access to standardized quality data stratified by race and ethnicity, to learn how they use it to address disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 health plan leaders across 9 Medicaid managed care plans in California. We used purposive sampling to maximize heterogeneity in geography and plan type (e.g., non-profit, commercial). We performed a thematic analysis based on iterative coding by two investigators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 4 major themes. Improving overall quality was tightly linked to a focus on standardized metrics that are integral to meeting regulatory or financial incentives. However, reducing disparities was not driven by standardized data, but by a mix of factors. Data were frequently only examined by race and ethnicity when overall performance was low. Disparities were attributed to either individual choices or cultural and linguistic factors, with plans focusing interventions on recently immigrated groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While plans' efforts to address overall quality were often informed by standardized data, actions to reduce disparities were not, at least partly because there were few regulatory or financial incentives driving meaningful use of data on disparities. Standardized data, as envisaged by the Affordable Care Act, could become more useful for addressing disparities if they are combined with policies and regulations that promote health care equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4006475/pdf/mmrr2012-002-04-a02.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:平价医疗法案》中包括对医疗质量数据收集进行标准化的规定,这些数据可用于衡量差异。我们对医疗补助管理性医疗计划的负责人进行了一项定性研究,以了解他们如何利用这些数据来解决差异问题:我们对加州 9 个医疗补助管理性医疗计划的 21 名医疗计划负责人进行了半结构化访谈。我们采用了有目的的抽样,以最大限度地提高地域和计划类型(如非营利性、商业性)的异质性。我们在两位调查员反复编码的基础上进行了主题分析:我们发现了四大主题。提高总体质量与对标准化指标的关注密切相关,这些指标是满足监管或经济激励不可或缺的。然而,缩小差距并非由标准化数据驱动,而是由多种因素共同作用。当总体绩效较低时,数据往往只按种族和民族进行检查。差异被归因于个人选择或文化和语言因素,计划将干预重点放在新移民群体上:尽管医保计划在解决整体质量问题时通常会参考标准化数据,但在减少差异方面的行动却并非如此,至少部分原因是很少有监管或经济激励措施来推动对差异数据的有效利用。如果将《平价医疗法案》所设想的标准化数据与促进医疗公平的政策和法规结合起来,就能更有效地解决差异问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of data in health care disparities in Medicaid managed care.

Background: The Affordable Care Act includes provisions to standardize the collection of data on health care quality that can be used to measure disparities. We conducted a qualitative study among leaders of Medicaid managed care plans, that currently have access to standardized quality data stratified by race and ethnicity, to learn how they use it to address disparities.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 health plan leaders across 9 Medicaid managed care plans in California. We used purposive sampling to maximize heterogeneity in geography and plan type (e.g., non-profit, commercial). We performed a thematic analysis based on iterative coding by two investigators.

Results: We found 4 major themes. Improving overall quality was tightly linked to a focus on standardized metrics that are integral to meeting regulatory or financial incentives. However, reducing disparities was not driven by standardized data, but by a mix of factors. Data were frequently only examined by race and ethnicity when overall performance was low. Disparities were attributed to either individual choices or cultural and linguistic factors, with plans focusing interventions on recently immigrated groups.

Conclusions: While plans' efforts to address overall quality were often informed by standardized data, actions to reduce disparities were not, at least partly because there were few regulatory or financial incentives driving meaningful use of data on disparities. Standardized data, as envisaged by the Affordable Care Act, could become more useful for addressing disparities if they are combined with policies and regulations that promote health care equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信