从全国健康访谈调查中评估医疗保险覆盖率的测量误差。

Medicare & medicaid research review Pub Date : 2012-06-26 eCollection Date: 2012-01-01 DOI:10.5600/mmrr.002.02.a05
Renee Gindi, Robin A Cohen
{"title":"从全国健康访谈调查中评估医疗保险覆盖率的测量误差。","authors":"Renee Gindi,&nbsp;Robin A Cohen","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.002.02.a05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Using linked administrative data, to validate Medicare coverage estimates among adults aged 65 or older from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), and to assess the impact of a recently added Medicare probe question on the validity of these estimates.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Linked 2005 NHIS and Master Beneficiary Record and Payment History Update System files from the Social Security Administration (SSA).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We compared Medicare coverage reported on NHIS with \"benchmark\" benefit records from SSA.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>With the addition of the probe question, more reports of coverage were captured, and the agreement between the NHIS-reported coverage and SSA records increased from 88% to 95%. Few additional overreports were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased accuracy of the Medicare coverage status of NHIS participants was achieved with the Medicare probe question. Though some misclassification remains, data users interested in Medicare coverage as an outcome or correlate can use this survey measure with confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4006379/pdf/mmrr2012-002-02-a05.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing measurement error in Medicare coverage from the National Health Interview Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Renee Gindi,&nbsp;Robin A Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.5600/mmrr.002.02.a05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Using linked administrative data, to validate Medicare coverage estimates among adults aged 65 or older from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), and to assess the impact of a recently added Medicare probe question on the validity of these estimates.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Linked 2005 NHIS and Master Beneficiary Record and Payment History Update System files from the Social Security Administration (SSA).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We compared Medicare coverage reported on NHIS with \\\"benchmark\\\" benefit records from SSA.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>With the addition of the probe question, more reports of coverage were captured, and the agreement between the NHIS-reported coverage and SSA records increased from 88% to 95%. Few additional overreports were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased accuracy of the Medicare coverage status of NHIS participants was achieved with the Medicare probe question. Though some misclassification remains, data users interested in Medicare coverage as an outcome or correlate can use this survey measure with confidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4006379/pdf/mmrr2012-002-02-a05.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.002.02.a05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.002.02.a05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:使用相关的行政数据,验证来自全国健康访谈调查(NHIS)的65岁及以上成年人的医疗保险覆盖估计,并评估最近增加的医疗保险调查问题对这些估计有效性的影响。数据来源:链接的2005年国家健康保险制度和总受益人记录和支付历史更新系统文件来自社会保障局(SSA)。研究设计:我们比较了NHIS报告的医疗保险覆盖率与SSA的“基准”福利记录。主要发现:随着探针问题的增加,更多的覆盖率报告被捕获,nhis报告的覆盖率和SSA记录之间的一致性从88%增加到95%。几乎没有观察到额外的多报。结论:通过医疗保险调查问题,提高了NHIS参与者医疗保险覆盖状况的准确性。尽管仍然存在一些错误分类,但对医疗保险覆盖范围感兴趣的数据用户可以放心地使用此调查措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing measurement error in Medicare coverage from the National Health Interview Survey.

Objectives: Using linked administrative data, to validate Medicare coverage estimates among adults aged 65 or older from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), and to assess the impact of a recently added Medicare probe question on the validity of these estimates.

Data sources: Linked 2005 NHIS and Master Beneficiary Record and Payment History Update System files from the Social Security Administration (SSA).

Study design: We compared Medicare coverage reported on NHIS with "benchmark" benefit records from SSA.

Principal findings: With the addition of the probe question, more reports of coverage were captured, and the agreement between the NHIS-reported coverage and SSA records increased from 88% to 95%. Few additional overreports were observed.

Conclusions: Increased accuracy of the Medicare coverage status of NHIS participants was achieved with the Medicare probe question. Though some misclassification remains, data users interested in Medicare coverage as an outcome or correlate can use this survey measure with confidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信