使用多年医疗保险现行受益人调查的方法学问题。

Medicare & medicaid research review Pub Date : 2012-02-08 eCollection Date: 2012-01-01 DOI:10.5600/mmrr.002.01.a04
Becky A Briesacher, Jennifer Tjia, Chyke A Doubeni, Yong Chen, Sowmya R Rao
{"title":"使用多年医疗保险现行受益人调查的方法学问题。","authors":"Becky A Briesacher,&nbsp;Jennifer Tjia,&nbsp;Chyke A Doubeni,&nbsp;Yong Chen,&nbsp;Sowmya R Rao","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.002.01.a04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The analysis presented in this paper examines the multi-year capacity of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed the literature for methodological approaches in research using multiple years of the MCBS and categorized the studies by study design, use of survey sampling weights, and variance adjustments. We then replicated the approaches in an empirical demonstration using functional status (activities of daily living (ADL) and 2005-2007 MCBS data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the systematic review, we identified 22 pooled, 17 repeated cross-sectional, and 17 longitudinal studies. Less than half of these studies explicitly described the weighting approach or variance estimation. In the empirical demonstration, we showed that different study designs and weighting approaches will yield statistically different estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a variety of methodological approaches when using multiple years of the MCBS, and some of them provide biased results. Research needs to improve in describing the methods and preferred approaches for using these complex data.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4006385/pdf/mmrr2012-002-01-a04.pdf","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological issues in using multiple years of the Medicare current beneficiary survey.\",\"authors\":\"Becky A Briesacher,&nbsp;Jennifer Tjia,&nbsp;Chyke A Doubeni,&nbsp;Yong Chen,&nbsp;Sowmya R Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.5600/mmrr.002.01.a04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The analysis presented in this paper examines the multi-year capacity of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed the literature for methodological approaches in research using multiple years of the MCBS and categorized the studies by study design, use of survey sampling weights, and variance adjustments. We then replicated the approaches in an empirical demonstration using functional status (activities of daily living (ADL) and 2005-2007 MCBS data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the systematic review, we identified 22 pooled, 17 repeated cross-sectional, and 17 longitudinal studies. Less than half of these studies explicitly described the weighting approach or variance estimation. In the empirical demonstration, we showed that different study designs and weighting approaches will yield statistically different estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a variety of methodological approaches when using multiple years of the MCBS, and some of them provide biased results. Research needs to improve in describing the methods and preferred approaches for using these complex data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4006385/pdf/mmrr2012-002-01-a04.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.002.01.a04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.002.01.a04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

背景:本文的分析考察了医疗保险现行受益人调查(MCBS)的多年能力。方法:我们系统地回顾了多年来MCBS研究的方法学方法文献,并根据研究设计、调查抽样权重的使用和方差调整对研究进行了分类。然后,我们使用功能状态(日常生活活动(ADL))和2005-2007年MCBS数据在实证论证中复制了这些方法。结果:在系统评价中,我们确定了22项合并研究、17项重复横断面研究和17项纵向研究。这些研究中只有不到一半明确地描述了加权方法或方差估计。在实证论证中,我们表明不同的研究设计和加权方法将产生统计上不同的估计。结论:在使用多年的MCBS时,有各种各样的方法学方法,其中一些方法提供了有偏差的结果。在描述使用这些复杂数据的方法和首选方法方面,研究需要改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methodological issues in using multiple years of the Medicare current beneficiary survey.

Background: The analysis presented in this paper examines the multi-year capacity of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS).

Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature for methodological approaches in research using multiple years of the MCBS and categorized the studies by study design, use of survey sampling weights, and variance adjustments. We then replicated the approaches in an empirical demonstration using functional status (activities of daily living (ADL) and 2005-2007 MCBS data.

Results: In the systematic review, we identified 22 pooled, 17 repeated cross-sectional, and 17 longitudinal studies. Less than half of these studies explicitly described the weighting approach or variance estimation. In the empirical demonstration, we showed that different study designs and weighting approaches will yield statistically different estimates.

Conclusion: There is a variety of methodological approaches when using multiple years of the MCBS, and some of them provide biased results. Research needs to improve in describing the methods and preferred approaches for using these complex data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信