MRI与MS信息处理速度的相关性:一项meta分析。

IF 2.2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Multiple Sclerosis International Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-03-25 DOI:10.1155/2014/975803
S M Rao, A L Martin, R Huelin, E Wissinger, Z Khankhel, E Kim, K Fahrbach
{"title":"MRI与MS信息处理速度的相关性:一项meta分析。","authors":"S M Rao,&nbsp;A L Martin,&nbsp;R Huelin,&nbsp;E Wissinger,&nbsp;Z Khankhel,&nbsp;E Kim,&nbsp;K Fahrbach","doi":"10.1155/2014/975803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives. To examine relationships between conventional MRI measures and the paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT) and symbol digit modalities test (SDMT). Methods. A systematic literature review was conducted. Included studies had ≥30 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, administered the SDMT or PASAT, and measured T2LV or brain atrophy. Meta-analysis of MRI/information processing speed (IPS) correlations, analysis of MRI/IPS significance tests to account for reporting bias, and binomial testing to detect trends when comparing correlation strengths of SDMT versus PASAT and T2LV versus atrophy were conducted. Results. The 39 studies identified frequently reported only significant correlations, suggesting reporting bias. Direct meta-analysis was only feasible for correlations between SDMT and T2LV (r = -0.45, P < 0.001) and atrophy in patients with mixed-MS subtypes (r = -0.54, P < 0.001). Familywise Holm-Bonferroni testing found that selective reporting was not the source of at least half of significant results reported. Binomial tests (P = 0.006) favored SDMT over PASAT in strength of MRI correlations. Conclusions. A moderate-to-strong correlation exists between impaired IPS and MRI in mixed MS populations. Correlations with MRI were stronger for SDMT than for PASAT. Neither heterogeneity among populations nor reporting bias appeared to be responsible for these findings. </p>","PeriodicalId":46096,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis International","volume":"2014 ","pages":"975803"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/975803","citationCount":"74","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlations between MRI and Information Processing Speed in MS: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"S M Rao,&nbsp;A L Martin,&nbsp;R Huelin,&nbsp;E Wissinger,&nbsp;Z Khankhel,&nbsp;E Kim,&nbsp;K Fahrbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/975803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objectives. To examine relationships between conventional MRI measures and the paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT) and symbol digit modalities test (SDMT). Methods. A systematic literature review was conducted. Included studies had ≥30 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, administered the SDMT or PASAT, and measured T2LV or brain atrophy. Meta-analysis of MRI/information processing speed (IPS) correlations, analysis of MRI/IPS significance tests to account for reporting bias, and binomial testing to detect trends when comparing correlation strengths of SDMT versus PASAT and T2LV versus atrophy were conducted. Results. The 39 studies identified frequently reported only significant correlations, suggesting reporting bias. Direct meta-analysis was only feasible for correlations between SDMT and T2LV (r = -0.45, P < 0.001) and atrophy in patients with mixed-MS subtypes (r = -0.54, P < 0.001). Familywise Holm-Bonferroni testing found that selective reporting was not the source of at least half of significant results reported. Binomial tests (P = 0.006) favored SDMT over PASAT in strength of MRI correlations. Conclusions. A moderate-to-strong correlation exists between impaired IPS and MRI in mixed MS populations. Correlations with MRI were stronger for SDMT than for PASAT. Neither heterogeneity among populations nor reporting bias appeared to be responsible for these findings. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple Sclerosis International\",\"volume\":\"2014 \",\"pages\":\"975803\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/975803\",\"citationCount\":\"74\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple Sclerosis International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/975803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/3/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/975803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 74

摘要

目标。研究常规MRI测量与节奏性听觉序列加法测试(PASAT)和符号数字模态测试(SDMT)之间的关系。方法。进行了系统的文献综述。纳入的研究有≥30名多发性硬化症(MS)患者,给予SDMT或PASAT,并测量T2LV或脑萎缩。对MRI/信息处理速度(IPS)相关性进行meta分析,对MRI/IPS显著性检验进行分析以解释报告偏倚,并对SDMT与PASAT、T2LV与萎缩的相关强度进行二项检验以检测趋势。结果。这39项研究经常只报告了显著的相关性,表明报告存在偏倚。直接荟萃分析仅适用于SDMT和T2LV (r = -0.45, P < 0.001)与混合ms亚型患者萎缩之间的相关性(r = -0.54, P < 0.001)。Familywise的Holm-Bonferroni测试发现,至少有一半的重要结果不是选择性报告的来源。二项检验(P = 0.006)在MRI相关性方面,SDMT优于PASAT。结论。在混合型多发性硬化症人群中,IPS损伤与MRI之间存在中等到强的相关性。SDMT与MRI的相关性强于PASAT。人群间的异质性和报告偏倚似乎都不是这些发现的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Correlations between MRI and Information Processing Speed in MS: A Meta-Analysis.

Correlations between MRI and Information Processing Speed in MS: A Meta-Analysis.

Correlations between MRI and Information Processing Speed in MS: A Meta-Analysis.

Correlations between MRI and Information Processing Speed in MS: A Meta-Analysis.

Objectives. To examine relationships between conventional MRI measures and the paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT) and symbol digit modalities test (SDMT). Methods. A systematic literature review was conducted. Included studies had ≥30 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, administered the SDMT or PASAT, and measured T2LV or brain atrophy. Meta-analysis of MRI/information processing speed (IPS) correlations, analysis of MRI/IPS significance tests to account for reporting bias, and binomial testing to detect trends when comparing correlation strengths of SDMT versus PASAT and T2LV versus atrophy were conducted. Results. The 39 studies identified frequently reported only significant correlations, suggesting reporting bias. Direct meta-analysis was only feasible for correlations between SDMT and T2LV (r = -0.45, P < 0.001) and atrophy in patients with mixed-MS subtypes (r = -0.54, P < 0.001). Familywise Holm-Bonferroni testing found that selective reporting was not the source of at least half of significant results reported. Binomial tests (P = 0.006) favored SDMT over PASAT in strength of MRI correlations. Conclusions. A moderate-to-strong correlation exists between impaired IPS and MRI in mixed MS populations. Correlations with MRI were stronger for SDMT than for PASAT. Neither heterogeneity among populations nor reporting bias appeared to be responsible for these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis International
Multiple Sclerosis International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of multiple sclerosis, including clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, therapeutics, genetics, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, psychology and neurorehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信