长期护理使用对双重资格和非双重资格老年受益人的医疗保险和医疗补助支出的影响。

Medicare & medicaid research review Pub Date : 2013-08-22 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.5600/mmrr.003.03.a05
Robert L Kane, Andrea Wysocki, Shriram Parashuram, Tetyana Shippee, Terry Lum
{"title":"长期护理使用对双重资格和非双重资格老年受益人的医疗保险和医疗补助支出的影响。","authors":"Robert L Kane,&nbsp;Andrea Wysocki,&nbsp;Shriram Parashuram,&nbsp;Tetyana Shippee,&nbsp;Terry Lum","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.003.03.a05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dual eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries consume disproportionate shares of both programs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare Medicare and Medicaid expenditures of elderly dual eligible beneficiaries with non-dual eligible beneficiaries based on their long-term care (LTC) use.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Secondary analysis of linked MAX and Medicare data in seven states.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Dual eligible adults (65+) receiving LTC in institutions, in the community, or not at all; and Medicare non-dual eligibles.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Medicaid acute medical and LTC expenditures per beneficiary year, Medicare expenditures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among dual eligibles and non-dual eligibles, the average number of diseases and case mix scores are higher for LTC users. Adjusting for case mix virtually eliminates the difference for medical costs, but not for LTC expenditures. Adjusting for LTC status reduces the difference in LTC costs, but increases the difference in medical costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts to control costs for dual eligibles should target those in LTC while better coordinating medical and LTC expenditures.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3983730/pdf/mmrr2013-003-03-a05.pdf","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of long-term care use on Medicare and Medicaid expenditures for dual eligible and non-dual eligible elderly beneficiaries.\",\"authors\":\"Robert L Kane,&nbsp;Andrea Wysocki,&nbsp;Shriram Parashuram,&nbsp;Tetyana Shippee,&nbsp;Terry Lum\",\"doi\":\"10.5600/mmrr.003.03.a05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dual eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries consume disproportionate shares of both programs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare Medicare and Medicaid expenditures of elderly dual eligible beneficiaries with non-dual eligible beneficiaries based on their long-term care (LTC) use.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Secondary analysis of linked MAX and Medicare data in seven states.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Dual eligible adults (65+) receiving LTC in institutions, in the community, or not at all; and Medicare non-dual eligibles.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Medicaid acute medical and LTC expenditures per beneficiary year, Medicare expenditures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among dual eligibles and non-dual eligibles, the average number of diseases and case mix scores are higher for LTC users. Adjusting for case mix virtually eliminates the difference for medical costs, but not for LTC expenditures. Adjusting for LTC status reduces the difference in LTC costs, but increases the difference in medical costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts to control costs for dual eligibles should target those in LTC while better coordinating medical and LTC expenditures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3983730/pdf/mmrr2013-003-03-a05.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.003.03.a05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.003.03.a05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

背景:双重资格的医疗保险和医疗补助受益人消耗了这两个项目不成比例的份额。目的:比较老年双重合格受益人与非双重合格受益人的医疗保险和医疗补助支出,基于他们的长期护理(LTC)使用。研究设计:对七个州的MAX和Medicare数据进行二次分析。对象:在机构、社区或根本不接受LTC的双重合格成年人(65岁以上);和医疗保险非双重资格。衡量标准:每个受益人年度的医疗补助紧急医疗和长期医疗支出,医疗保险支出。结果:在双重资格和非双重资格中,LTC使用者的平均疾病数量和病例组合得分较高。根据病例组合进行调整实际上消除了医疗费用的差异,但没有消除长期治疗费用的差异。调整LTC状态减少了LTC成本的差异,但增加了医疗成本的差异。结论:努力控制双重资格的成本应针对长期医疗服务的患者,同时更好地协调医疗和长期医疗服务的支出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of long-term care use on Medicare and Medicaid expenditures for dual eligible and non-dual eligible elderly beneficiaries.

Background: Dual eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries consume disproportionate shares of both programs.

Objectives: To compare Medicare and Medicaid expenditures of elderly dual eligible beneficiaries with non-dual eligible beneficiaries based on their long-term care (LTC) use.

Research design: Secondary analysis of linked MAX and Medicare data in seven states.

Subjects: Dual eligible adults (65+) receiving LTC in institutions, in the community, or not at all; and Medicare non-dual eligibles.

Measures: Medicaid acute medical and LTC expenditures per beneficiary year, Medicare expenditures.

Results: Among dual eligibles and non-dual eligibles, the average number of diseases and case mix scores are higher for LTC users. Adjusting for case mix virtually eliminates the difference for medical costs, but not for LTC expenditures. Adjusting for LTC status reduces the difference in LTC costs, but increases the difference in medical costs.

Conclusions: Efforts to control costs for dual eligibles should target those in LTC while better coordinating medical and LTC expenditures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信