是葡萄球菌,不是MRSA?护理专业学生的携带率和转换率的最终报告。

Rodney E Rohde, Tom Patterson, Barbara Covington, Bob Edward Vásquez, Gerald Redwine, Emillio Carranco
{"title":"是葡萄球菌,不是MRSA?护理专业学生的携带率和转换率的最终报告。","authors":"Rodney E Rohde,&nbsp;Tom Patterson,&nbsp;Barbara Covington,&nbsp;Bob Edward Vásquez,&nbsp;Gerald Redwine,&nbsp;Emillio Carranco","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and characterize staphylococcal carriage, possibly including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and conversion rates in nursing students across clinical semester rotations and to describe risk factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective longitudinal cohort design with six times of measurement. Data collected August 2010 to May 2012. Institutional Review Board approval (2010F5693).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Texas State University, San Marcos, TX.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eighty-seven nursing students.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A positive MRSA swab was considered an end point for participation. Intervention offered was bactroban (mupirocin) for nasal decolonization and an oral antibiotic, doxycycline; follow-up post treatment collection sample was done to verify decolonization prior to next clinical rotation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Screening for Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA identification; confirmation and antibiotic susceptibility by Vitek 2; self-administered questionnaires delineating demographics and risk factors; panel logistic regression models by Stata version 13.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRSA colonization did not increase. S. aureus incidence was 17.7 - 26.4%. Staphylococcal species incidence other than S. aureus increased (9.2 - 82.3%). The following odds ratio (OR) associations were found to be statistically significant: boil or skin infections with S. aureus (OR = 2.94, p < .01), working or volunteering in a healthcare facility odds with species other than S. aureus (OR = 4.41, p < .01) and gym and sports facilities odds with S. other (OR 2.45, p < .01). The most frequently occurring species at Wave 5 was S. hominis (21 isolates) while the most frequently occurring species at Wave 6 was S. epidermidis (25 isolates).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRSA colonization did not increase during longitudinal study. S. aureus colonization remained fairly stable throughout the study (17 - 26%). Species colonization with non S. aureus species (e.g. S. hominis, S. epidermis, S. haemolyticus) increased significantly (9.2 - 82.3%) during clinical rotations. Knowledge of infection control and compliance may have contributed to an absence of MRSA colonization; however, the colonization by other staphylococci has been shown to be a risk factor for MRSA acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":72611,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology","volume":"27 1","pages":"21-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Staphylococcus, not MRSA? A final report of carriage and conversion rates in nursing students.\",\"authors\":\"Rodney E Rohde,&nbsp;Tom Patterson,&nbsp;Barbara Covington,&nbsp;Bob Edward Vásquez,&nbsp;Gerald Redwine,&nbsp;Emillio Carranco\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and characterize staphylococcal carriage, possibly including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and conversion rates in nursing students across clinical semester rotations and to describe risk factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective longitudinal cohort design with six times of measurement. Data collected August 2010 to May 2012. Institutional Review Board approval (2010F5693).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Texas State University, San Marcos, TX.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eighty-seven nursing students.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A positive MRSA swab was considered an end point for participation. Intervention offered was bactroban (mupirocin) for nasal decolonization and an oral antibiotic, doxycycline; follow-up post treatment collection sample was done to verify decolonization prior to next clinical rotation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Screening for Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA identification; confirmation and antibiotic susceptibility by Vitek 2; self-administered questionnaires delineating demographics and risk factors; panel logistic regression models by Stata version 13.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRSA colonization did not increase. S. aureus incidence was 17.7 - 26.4%. Staphylococcal species incidence other than S. aureus increased (9.2 - 82.3%). The following odds ratio (OR) associations were found to be statistically significant: boil or skin infections with S. aureus (OR = 2.94, p < .01), working or volunteering in a healthcare facility odds with species other than S. aureus (OR = 4.41, p < .01) and gym and sports facilities odds with S. other (OR 2.45, p < .01). The most frequently occurring species at Wave 5 was S. hominis (21 isolates) while the most frequently occurring species at Wave 6 was S. epidermidis (25 isolates).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRSA colonization did not increase during longitudinal study. S. aureus colonization remained fairly stable throughout the study (17 - 26%). Species colonization with non S. aureus species (e.g. S. hominis, S. epidermis, S. haemolyticus) increased significantly (9.2 - 82.3%) during clinical rotations. Knowledge of infection control and compliance may have contributed to an absence of MRSA colonization; however, the colonization by other staphylococci has been shown to be a risk factor for MRSA acquisition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"21-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估和描述护理学生在临床学期轮换期间的葡萄球菌携带情况,可能包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA),以及转换率,并描述危险因素。设计:六次测量的前瞻性纵向队列设计。数据收集于2010年8月至2012年5月。机构审查委员会批准(2010F5693)。地点:德克萨斯州圣马科斯的德克萨斯州立大学。参与者:87名护理专业学生。干预措施:MRSA拭子阳性被认为是参与的终点。提供的干预措施是用于鼻腔去菌落的巴troban(莫匹罗星)和口服抗生素强力霉素;后续治疗后收集样本,以验证下一个临床轮转前的非殖化。主要观察指标:金黄色葡萄球菌筛查和MRSA鉴定;Vitek 2确证及药敏;描述人口统计和风险因素的自我管理问卷;面板逻辑回归模型由Stata版本13。结果:MRSA定殖未增加。金黄色葡萄球菌的发病率为17.7% ~ 26.4%。除金黄色葡萄球菌外,其他葡萄球菌的发病率增高(9.2 ~ 82.3%)。以下比值比(OR)关联发现具有统计学意义:金黄色葡萄球菌感染的疮或皮肤感染(OR = 2.94, p < 0.01),在医疗机构工作或志愿服务与金黄色葡萄球菌以外的物种的比值(OR = 4.41, p < 0.01)以及健身房和体育设施与金黄色葡萄球菌的比值(OR 2.45, p < 0.01)。第5波最常见的种是人球菌(21株),第6波最常见的种是表皮链球菌(25株)。结论:在纵向研究中,MRSA定植没有增加。金黄色葡萄球菌的定殖在整个研究过程中保持相当稳定(17 - 26%)。在临床轮换期间,非金黄色葡萄球菌(如人葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌、溶血葡萄球菌)的定殖显著增加(9.2 - 82.3%)。感染控制知识和依从性可能导致MRSA定植缺失;然而,其他葡萄球菌的定植已被证明是MRSA获得的一个危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Staphylococcus, not MRSA? A final report of carriage and conversion rates in nursing students.

Objective: To evaluate and characterize staphylococcal carriage, possibly including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and conversion rates in nursing students across clinical semester rotations and to describe risk factors.

Design: A prospective longitudinal cohort design with six times of measurement. Data collected August 2010 to May 2012. Institutional Review Board approval (2010F5693).

Setting: Texas State University, San Marcos, TX.

Participants: Eighty-seven nursing students.

Interventions: A positive MRSA swab was considered an end point for participation. Intervention offered was bactroban (mupirocin) for nasal decolonization and an oral antibiotic, doxycycline; follow-up post treatment collection sample was done to verify decolonization prior to next clinical rotation.

Main outcome measures: Screening for Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA identification; confirmation and antibiotic susceptibility by Vitek 2; self-administered questionnaires delineating demographics and risk factors; panel logistic regression models by Stata version 13.

Results: MRSA colonization did not increase. S. aureus incidence was 17.7 - 26.4%. Staphylococcal species incidence other than S. aureus increased (9.2 - 82.3%). The following odds ratio (OR) associations were found to be statistically significant: boil or skin infections with S. aureus (OR = 2.94, p < .01), working or volunteering in a healthcare facility odds with species other than S. aureus (OR = 4.41, p < .01) and gym and sports facilities odds with S. other (OR 2.45, p < .01). The most frequently occurring species at Wave 5 was S. hominis (21 isolates) while the most frequently occurring species at Wave 6 was S. epidermidis (25 isolates).

Conclusions: MRSA colonization did not increase during longitudinal study. S. aureus colonization remained fairly stable throughout the study (17 - 26%). Species colonization with non S. aureus species (e.g. S. hominis, S. epidermis, S. haemolyticus) increased significantly (9.2 - 82.3%) during clinical rotations. Knowledge of infection control and compliance may have contributed to an absence of MRSA colonization; however, the colonization by other staphylococci has been shown to be a risk factor for MRSA acquisition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信