脑脊液细胞学诊断转移性肿瘤的准确性:连续脑脊液样本的分析。

Korean Journal of Pathology Pub Date : 2013-12-01 Epub Date: 2013-12-24 DOI:10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.6.563
Yoon Sung Bae, June-Won Cheong, Won Seok Chang, Sewha Kim, Eun Ji Oh, Se Hoon Kim
{"title":"脑脊液细胞学诊断转移性肿瘤的准确性:连续脑脊液样本的分析。","authors":"Yoon Sung Bae,&nbsp;June-Won Cheong,&nbsp;Won Seok Chang,&nbsp;Sewha Kim,&nbsp;Eun Ji Oh,&nbsp;Se Hoon Kim","doi":"10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.6.563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination can be used to verify the presence of primary malignancies as well as cases of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis. Because of its importance, there have been several studies concerning the sensitivity of CSF cytology. To determine the practical use and reproducibility of diagnoses based on CSF cytology, we evaluated this test by analyzing cytology results from consecutive CSF samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between July 2010 and June 2013, 385 CSF cytology samples from 42 patients were collected. The samples were gathered using a ventricular catheter and reservoir. CSF cytology of all patients was examined more than two times with immunocytochemistry for cytokeratin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary neoplastic sites and histologic types of patients' metastatic cancer were diverse. The overall sensitivity for detecting malignancy was 41.3%. Even within short-term intervals, diagnoses frequently changed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results were inconsistent, with low sensitivity, when compared to the results of previous studies. However, CSF evaluation can still provide valuable diagnostic and prognostic information because adjuvant treatments are now routinely performed in patients with CNS metastasis. Negative CSF cytology results should not be ignored, and continuous CSF follow-up is essential for following the clinical course of patients with metastatic cancer involving the CNS.</p>","PeriodicalId":49936,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Pathology","volume":"47 6","pages":"563-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.6.563","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Cytology in Metastatic Tumors: An Analysis of Consecutive CSF Samples.\",\"authors\":\"Yoon Sung Bae,&nbsp;June-Won Cheong,&nbsp;Won Seok Chang,&nbsp;Sewha Kim,&nbsp;Eun Ji Oh,&nbsp;Se Hoon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.6.563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination can be used to verify the presence of primary malignancies as well as cases of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis. Because of its importance, there have been several studies concerning the sensitivity of CSF cytology. To determine the practical use and reproducibility of diagnoses based on CSF cytology, we evaluated this test by analyzing cytology results from consecutive CSF samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between July 2010 and June 2013, 385 CSF cytology samples from 42 patients were collected. The samples were gathered using a ventricular catheter and reservoir. CSF cytology of all patients was examined more than two times with immunocytochemistry for cytokeratin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary neoplastic sites and histologic types of patients' metastatic cancer were diverse. The overall sensitivity for detecting malignancy was 41.3%. Even within short-term intervals, diagnoses frequently changed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results were inconsistent, with low sensitivity, when compared to the results of previous studies. However, CSF evaluation can still provide valuable diagnostic and prognostic information because adjuvant treatments are now routinely performed in patients with CNS metastasis. Negative CSF cytology results should not be ignored, and continuous CSF follow-up is essential for following the clinical course of patients with metastatic cancer involving the CNS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Pathology\",\"volume\":\"47 6\",\"pages\":\"563-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.6.563\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.6.563\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/12/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.6.563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:脑脊液(CSF)检查可用于证实原发性恶性肿瘤的存在以及中枢神经系统(CNS)转移的病例。由于脑脊液细胞学的重要性,已有一些关于脑脊液细胞学敏感性的研究。为了确定基于脑脊液细胞学诊断的实际用途和可重复性,我们通过分析连续脑脊液样本的细胞学结果来评估该测试。方法:2010年7月至2013年6月收集42例患者的脑脊液细胞学样本385份。使用心室导管和贮液器收集样本。所有患者的脑脊液细胞学检查超过两次,免疫细胞化学检测细胞角蛋白。结果:转移癌原发部位和组织学类型多样。检测恶性肿瘤的总体敏感性为41.3%。即使在短期内,诊断也经常发生变化。结论:与以往的研究结果相比,我们的结果不一致,灵敏度低。然而,脑脊液评估仍然可以提供有价值的诊断和预后信息,因为辅助治疗现在通常用于中枢神经系统转移患者。脑脊液细胞学阴性结果不应被忽视,持续的脑脊液随访对于追踪累及中枢神经系统的转移性癌症患者的临床病程至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Cytology in Metastatic Tumors: An Analysis of Consecutive CSF Samples.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Cytology in Metastatic Tumors: An Analysis of Consecutive CSF Samples.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Cytology in Metastatic Tumors: An Analysis of Consecutive CSF Samples.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Cytology in Metastatic Tumors: An Analysis of Consecutive CSF Samples.

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination can be used to verify the presence of primary malignancies as well as cases of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis. Because of its importance, there have been several studies concerning the sensitivity of CSF cytology. To determine the practical use and reproducibility of diagnoses based on CSF cytology, we evaluated this test by analyzing cytology results from consecutive CSF samples.

Methods: Between July 2010 and June 2013, 385 CSF cytology samples from 42 patients were collected. The samples were gathered using a ventricular catheter and reservoir. CSF cytology of all patients was examined more than two times with immunocytochemistry for cytokeratin.

Results: Primary neoplastic sites and histologic types of patients' metastatic cancer were diverse. The overall sensitivity for detecting malignancy was 41.3%. Even within short-term intervals, diagnoses frequently changed.

Conclusions: Our results were inconsistent, with low sensitivity, when compared to the results of previous studies. However, CSF evaluation can still provide valuable diagnostic and prognostic information because adjuvant treatments are now routinely performed in patients with CNS metastasis. Negative CSF cytology results should not be ignored, and continuous CSF follow-up is essential for following the clinical course of patients with metastatic cancer involving the CNS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Pathology
Korean Journal of Pathology 医学-病理学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信