利用补骨脂素环加成反应大规模富集rna结合蛋白和鉴定结合位点

IF 1.2 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Haofan Sun , Weibing Zhang , Ping Xu , Weijie Qin
{"title":"利用补骨脂素环加成反应大规模富集rna结合蛋白和鉴定结合位点","authors":"Haofan Sun ,&nbsp;Weibing Zhang ,&nbsp;Ping Xu ,&nbsp;Weijie Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.cjac.2023.100291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play central roles in the regulation of gene expression in eukaryotes. The elucidation of complex RNA‒protein interaction patterns and specific binding sites has been the subject of intensive research in recent years. However, large-scale RNA‒protein binding site (RBS) identification remains an urgent issue due to the lack of broad and unbiased RBP enrichment methods. In this study, a novel strategy for RBS identification was developed by using a psoralen probe (PP) for large-scale RBP enrichment. A total of 1957 high-confidence RBPs with good reproducibility were identified via mass spectrometry. A total of 1783 protein groups (91.1%) were previously annotated as RBPs. To identify RBSs, the enriched RBPs were treated with two different methods: digestion via ribonucleases (RNases) or hydrofluoric acid (HF). A total of 448 high-confidence RBSs were identified by using the former strategy, and 1301 high-confidence RBSs were identified by using the latter method. By comparing the identification results of cross-linking sites in both methods, it was observed that the binding of RNA to RBP was less likely to occur on acidic amino acids. Furthermore, the HF method can identify RBS in a more unbiased manner than the RNase method. The above mentioned results suggest the potential of both methods for large-scale RBS identification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":277,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry","volume":"51 8","pages":"Article 100291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large-scale enrichment of RNA-binding proteins and binding site identification using the psoralen cycloaddition reaction\",\"authors\":\"Haofan Sun ,&nbsp;Weibing Zhang ,&nbsp;Ping Xu ,&nbsp;Weijie Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjac.2023.100291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play central roles in the regulation of gene expression in eukaryotes. The elucidation of complex RNA‒protein interaction patterns and specific binding sites has been the subject of intensive research in recent years. However, large-scale RNA‒protein binding site (RBS) identification remains an urgent issue due to the lack of broad and unbiased RBP enrichment methods. In this study, a novel strategy for RBS identification was developed by using a psoralen probe (PP) for large-scale RBP enrichment. A total of 1957 high-confidence RBPs with good reproducibility were identified via mass spectrometry. A total of 1783 protein groups (91.1%) were previously annotated as RBPs. To identify RBSs, the enriched RBPs were treated with two different methods: digestion via ribonucleases (RNases) or hydrofluoric acid (HF). A total of 448 high-confidence RBSs were identified by using the former strategy, and 1301 high-confidence RBSs were identified by using the latter method. By comparing the identification results of cross-linking sites in both methods, it was observed that the binding of RNA to RBP was less likely to occur on acidic amino acids. Furthermore, the HF method can identify RBS in a more unbiased manner than the RNase method. The above mentioned results suggest the potential of both methods for large-scale RBS identification.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"51 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 100291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872204023000658\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872204023000658","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

rna结合蛋白(rbp)在真核生物基因表达调控中发挥核心作用。近年来,复杂rna -蛋白相互作用模式和特异性结合位点的阐明一直是研究的热点。然而,由于缺乏广泛和公正的RBP富集方法,大规模的rna -蛋白结合位点(RBS)鉴定仍然是一个紧迫的问题。在这项研究中,开发了一种新的RBS鉴定策略,即使用补骨脂素探针(PP)大规模富集RBP。用质谱法鉴定了1957个高置信度、重现性好的rbp。共有1783个蛋白组(91.1%)先前被注释为rbp。为了鉴定rbp,对富集的rbp进行了两种不同的处理方法:通过核糖核酸酶(RNases)或氢氟酸(HF)进行酶切。采用前一种方法共识别出448个高置信度rbs,采用后一种方法共识别出1301个高置信度rbs。通过比较两种方法对交联位点的鉴定结果,我们发现RNA与RBP的结合较少发生在酸性氨基酸上。此外,HF方法可以比RNase方法以更无偏的方式识别RBS。上述结果表明,这两种方法都具有大规模鉴定RBS的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Large-scale enrichment of RNA-binding proteins and binding site identification using the psoralen cycloaddition reaction

Large-scale enrichment of RNA-binding proteins and binding site identification using the psoralen cycloaddition reaction

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play central roles in the regulation of gene expression in eukaryotes. The elucidation of complex RNA‒protein interaction patterns and specific binding sites has been the subject of intensive research in recent years. However, large-scale RNA‒protein binding site (RBS) identification remains an urgent issue due to the lack of broad and unbiased RBP enrichment methods. In this study, a novel strategy for RBS identification was developed by using a psoralen probe (PP) for large-scale RBP enrichment. A total of 1957 high-confidence RBPs with good reproducibility were identified via mass spectrometry. A total of 1783 protein groups (91.1%) were previously annotated as RBPs. To identify RBSs, the enriched RBPs were treated with two different methods: digestion via ribonucleases (RNases) or hydrofluoric acid (HF). A total of 448 high-confidence RBSs were identified by using the former strategy, and 1301 high-confidence RBSs were identified by using the latter method. By comparing the identification results of cross-linking sites in both methods, it was observed that the binding of RNA to RBP was less likely to occur on acidic amino acids. Furthermore, the HF method can identify RBS in a more unbiased manner than the RNase method. The above mentioned results suggest the potential of both methods for large-scale RBS identification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
17223
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry(CJAC) is an academic journal of analytical chemistry established in 1972 and sponsored by the Chinese Chemical Society and Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Its objectives are to report the original scientific research achievements and review the recent development of analytical chemistry in all areas. The journal sets up 5 columns including Research Papers, Research Notes, Experimental Technique and Instrument, Review and Progress and Summary Accounts. The journal published monthly in Chinese language. A detailed abstract, keywords and the titles of figures and tables are provided in English, except column of Summary Accounts. Prof. Wang Erkang, an outstanding analytical chemist, academician of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Third World Academy of Sciences, holds the post of the Editor-in-chief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信