德文版本的物质价值量表。

Psycho-social medicine Pub Date : 2013-06-24 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.3205/psm000095
Astrid Müller, Dirk J M Smits, Laurence Claes, Olaf Gefeller, Andreas Hinz, Martina de Zwaan
{"title":"德文版本的物质价值量表。","authors":"Astrid Müller,&nbsp;Dirk J M Smits,&nbsp;Laurence Claes,&nbsp;Olaf Gefeller,&nbsp;Andreas Hinz,&nbsp;Martina de Zwaan","doi":"10.3205/psm000095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The Material Values Scale is an instrument to assess beliefs about the importance to own material things. This instrument originally consists of the three subscales: 'centrality', 'success', and 'happiness'. The present study investigated the psychometric properties of the German version of the MVS (G-MVS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A population-based sample of 2,295 adult Germans completed the questionnaire in order to investigate the factorial structure. To test construct validity, additional samples were gathered among patients with compulsive buying (N=52) and medical students (N=347) who also answered the Compulsive Buying Scale (CBS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the German population-based sample we could not confirm the 3-factor model but rather suggest a 2-factor solution with a first collapsed factor 'centrality/success', and the second factor 'happiness'. Patients with compulsive buying showed the highest scores on the G-MVS. While G-MVS scores among compulsive buyers and medical students were significantly related to compulsive buying scores, the correlation between the G-MVS and the depression measure appeared substantially lower. We did not find any gender differences regarding materialism, neither in the population-based sample nor in the students' or compulsive buyers' samples. However, age was negatively related to G-MVS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Confirmatory factor analyses suggest a 2-factor model of the G-MVS. Overall, the results indicate the use of the G-MVS as a brief, psychometrically sound, and potentially valid measure for the assessment of material values.</p>","PeriodicalId":88305,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-social medicine","volume":"10 ","pages":"Doc05"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/psm000095","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The German version of the Material Values Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Astrid Müller,&nbsp;Dirk J M Smits,&nbsp;Laurence Claes,&nbsp;Olaf Gefeller,&nbsp;Andreas Hinz,&nbsp;Martina de Zwaan\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/psm000095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The Material Values Scale is an instrument to assess beliefs about the importance to own material things. This instrument originally consists of the three subscales: 'centrality', 'success', and 'happiness'. The present study investigated the psychometric properties of the German version of the MVS (G-MVS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A population-based sample of 2,295 adult Germans completed the questionnaire in order to investigate the factorial structure. To test construct validity, additional samples were gathered among patients with compulsive buying (N=52) and medical students (N=347) who also answered the Compulsive Buying Scale (CBS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the German population-based sample we could not confirm the 3-factor model but rather suggest a 2-factor solution with a first collapsed factor 'centrality/success', and the second factor 'happiness'. Patients with compulsive buying showed the highest scores on the G-MVS. While G-MVS scores among compulsive buyers and medical students were significantly related to compulsive buying scores, the correlation between the G-MVS and the depression measure appeared substantially lower. We did not find any gender differences regarding materialism, neither in the population-based sample nor in the students' or compulsive buyers' samples. However, age was negatively related to G-MVS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Confirmatory factor analyses suggest a 2-factor model of the G-MVS. Overall, the results indicate the use of the G-MVS as a brief, psychometrically sound, and potentially valid measure for the assessment of material values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho-social medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Doc05\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/psm000095\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho-social medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/psm000095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/psm000095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

目的:物质价值量表是一种评估人们对拥有物质的重要性的信念的工具。这个工具最初由三个子量表组成:“中心性”、“成功”和“幸福”。本研究考察了德国版MVS (G-MVS)的心理测量特性。方法:以人口为基础的2295名成年德国人完成问卷调查,以调查因子结构。为了检验结构的有效性,我们在强迫购买患者(N=52)和医学生(N=347)中收集了额外的样本,他们也回答了强迫购买量表(CBS)和患者健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-8)。结果:在德国基于人口的样本中,我们无法确认三因素模型,而是提出了一个两因素的解决方案,其中第一个崩溃因素是“中心性/成功”,第二个因素是“幸福”。强迫性购买的患者在G-MVS上得分最高。虽然强迫购买者和医学生的G-MVS得分与强迫购买得分显著相关,但G-MVS与抑郁测量之间的相关性明显较低。我们没有发现关于物质主义的任何性别差异,无论是在以人口为基础的样本中,还是在学生或强迫性购买者的样本中。然而,年龄与G-MVS得分呈负相关。结论:验证性因素分析提示G-MVS的双因素模型。总的来说,结果表明使用G-MVS作为一个简短的,心理测量学上健全的,潜在的有效的测量材料价值的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The German version of the Material Values Scale.

The German version of the Material Values Scale.

The German version of the Material Values Scale.

The German version of the Material Values Scale.

Aim: The Material Values Scale is an instrument to assess beliefs about the importance to own material things. This instrument originally consists of the three subscales: 'centrality', 'success', and 'happiness'. The present study investigated the psychometric properties of the German version of the MVS (G-MVS).

Method: A population-based sample of 2,295 adult Germans completed the questionnaire in order to investigate the factorial structure. To test construct validity, additional samples were gathered among patients with compulsive buying (N=52) and medical students (N=347) who also answered the Compulsive Buying Scale (CBS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8).

Results: In the German population-based sample we could not confirm the 3-factor model but rather suggest a 2-factor solution with a first collapsed factor 'centrality/success', and the second factor 'happiness'. Patients with compulsive buying showed the highest scores on the G-MVS. While G-MVS scores among compulsive buyers and medical students were significantly related to compulsive buying scores, the correlation between the G-MVS and the depression measure appeared substantially lower. We did not find any gender differences regarding materialism, neither in the population-based sample nor in the students' or compulsive buyers' samples. However, age was negatively related to G-MVS scores.

Conclusion: Confirmatory factor analyses suggest a 2-factor model of the G-MVS. Overall, the results indicate the use of the G-MVS as a brief, psychometrically sound, and potentially valid measure for the assessment of material values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信