污染创伤伤口的预防性抗生素治疗:2天vs 5天治疗。

BioImpacts : BI Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-03-17 DOI:10.5681/bi.2012.004
Hamed-Basir Ghafouri, Barzin Bagheri-Behzad, Mohammad-Reza Yasinzadeh, Ehsan Modirian, Dorsa Divsalar, Shervin Farahmand
{"title":"污染创伤伤口的预防性抗生素治疗:2天vs 5天治疗。","authors":"Hamed-Basir Ghafouri,&nbsp;Barzin Bagheri-Behzad,&nbsp;Mohammad-Reza Yasinzadeh,&nbsp;Ehsan Modirian,&nbsp;Dorsa Divsalar,&nbsp;Shervin Farahmand","doi":"10.5681/bi.2012.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency department manages several kinds of wounds including simple, non-bite traumatic wounds and lacerations. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy is one of pre-scribed treatment in these conditions. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of the two day regimen of prophylactic antimicrobial agents with the five day regimen in simple traumatic but highly contaminated wounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2010 and May 2010, patients presenting with simple traumatic wounds or lacerations in different parts of the body, highly contaminated with soil, debris or feces in emergency department of a referral educational hospital in Tehran (Rasul-Akram hospital), Iran, went for primary closure. All of the patients were provided prophylactic antibiotic, however, prescribed for one group (A) of patients for 2 days and other group (B) received for 5 days, according to the physician concerned. As these treatments were routine, we selected 70 patients from each group using table of random numbers. The patients were warned about the signs of infection including long-lasting erythema, purulent discharge and inflammation and were supposed to inform the concerned physician in any of such alarming situations. Oral Cephalexin 500 mg qid was prescribed for all patients enrolled for prophylaxis treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On follow-up 11 (8.2%) patients were found to develop sutured site infection (6 out of 70 (8.57%) in group A, and five out of 70 (7.14%) in group B (P=0.31)). There was no statistical difference between infection rates between men (8.6%) in comparison to women (6.25%) (P>0.05; CI=95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed that 2-day prophylactic antibiotic therapy using Cephalexin is at least as effective as a 5-day regimen in relation to development of surgical site infection in patients with simple traumatic contaminated wounds or lacerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":375065,"journal":{"name":"BioImpacts : BI","volume":" ","pages":"33-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5681/bi.2012.004","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prophylactic Antibiotic Therapy in Contaminated Traumatic Wounds: Two Days versus Five Days Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Hamed-Basir Ghafouri,&nbsp;Barzin Bagheri-Behzad,&nbsp;Mohammad-Reza Yasinzadeh,&nbsp;Ehsan Modirian,&nbsp;Dorsa Divsalar,&nbsp;Shervin Farahmand\",\"doi\":\"10.5681/bi.2012.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency department manages several kinds of wounds including simple, non-bite traumatic wounds and lacerations. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy is one of pre-scribed treatment in these conditions. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of the two day regimen of prophylactic antimicrobial agents with the five day regimen in simple traumatic but highly contaminated wounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2010 and May 2010, patients presenting with simple traumatic wounds or lacerations in different parts of the body, highly contaminated with soil, debris or feces in emergency department of a referral educational hospital in Tehran (Rasul-Akram hospital), Iran, went for primary closure. All of the patients were provided prophylactic antibiotic, however, prescribed for one group (A) of patients for 2 days and other group (B) received for 5 days, according to the physician concerned. As these treatments were routine, we selected 70 patients from each group using table of random numbers. The patients were warned about the signs of infection including long-lasting erythema, purulent discharge and inflammation and were supposed to inform the concerned physician in any of such alarming situations. Oral Cephalexin 500 mg qid was prescribed for all patients enrolled for prophylaxis treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On follow-up 11 (8.2%) patients were found to develop sutured site infection (6 out of 70 (8.57%) in group A, and five out of 70 (7.14%) in group B (P=0.31)). There was no statistical difference between infection rates between men (8.6%) in comparison to women (6.25%) (P>0.05; CI=95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed that 2-day prophylactic antibiotic therapy using Cephalexin is at least as effective as a 5-day regimen in relation to development of surgical site infection in patients with simple traumatic contaminated wounds or lacerations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":375065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioImpacts : BI\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"33-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5681/bi.2012.004\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioImpacts : BI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5681/bi.2012.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/3/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioImpacts : BI","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5681/bi.2012.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

简介:急诊科处理几种伤口,包括单纯性、非咬伤性创伤和撕裂伤。预防性抗生素治疗是这些疾病的处方治疗之一。我们的目的是比较预防性抗菌药物2天方案与5天方案在单纯创伤但高度污染伤口的临床疗效。方法:2010年1月至2010年5月,伊朗德黑兰一家转诊教育医院(Rasul-Akram医院)急诊科收治的单纯创伤性伤口或身体不同部位撕裂伤,被土壤、碎片或粪便高度污染的患者进行初步封闭。所有患者均给予预防性抗生素,但据有关医生介绍,一组(A)患者使用2天,另一组(B)患者使用5天。由于这些治疗均为常规治疗,我们采用随机数字表从每组中选择70例患者。患者被警告感染的迹象,包括长期红斑、脓性分泌物和炎症,并应在任何这种令人担忧的情况下通知有关医生。所有参加预防治疗的患者口服头孢氨苄500 mg qid。结果:随访发现缝合部位感染11例(8.2%),其中A组6例(8.57%),B组5例(7.14%)(P=0.31)。男性感染率为8.6%,女性感染率为6.25%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05;CI = 95%)。结论:我们的研究表明,在单纯创伤性污染伤口或撕裂伤患者手术部位感染的发展方面,使用头孢氨苄进行2天预防性抗生素治疗至少与5天治疗同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prophylactic Antibiotic Therapy in Contaminated Traumatic Wounds: Two Days versus Five Days Treatment.

Introduction: Emergency department manages several kinds of wounds including simple, non-bite traumatic wounds and lacerations. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy is one of pre-scribed treatment in these conditions. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of the two day regimen of prophylactic antimicrobial agents with the five day regimen in simple traumatic but highly contaminated wounds.

Methods: Between January 2010 and May 2010, patients presenting with simple traumatic wounds or lacerations in different parts of the body, highly contaminated with soil, debris or feces in emergency department of a referral educational hospital in Tehran (Rasul-Akram hospital), Iran, went for primary closure. All of the patients were provided prophylactic antibiotic, however, prescribed for one group (A) of patients for 2 days and other group (B) received for 5 days, according to the physician concerned. As these treatments were routine, we selected 70 patients from each group using table of random numbers. The patients were warned about the signs of infection including long-lasting erythema, purulent discharge and inflammation and were supposed to inform the concerned physician in any of such alarming situations. Oral Cephalexin 500 mg qid was prescribed for all patients enrolled for prophylaxis treatment.

Results: On follow-up 11 (8.2%) patients were found to develop sutured site infection (6 out of 70 (8.57%) in group A, and five out of 70 (7.14%) in group B (P=0.31)). There was no statistical difference between infection rates between men (8.6%) in comparison to women (6.25%) (P>0.05; CI=95%).

Conclusion: Our study showed that 2-day prophylactic antibiotic therapy using Cephalexin is at least as effective as a 5-day regimen in relation to development of surgical site infection in patients with simple traumatic contaminated wounds or lacerations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信