评估基于地图集的前额叶脑区划分在老年群体中的表现。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Benjamin S Aribisala, Simon R Cox, Karen J Ferguson, Sarah E MacPherson, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Natalie A Royle, Maria C Valdés Hernández, Mark E Bastin, Ian J Deary, Joanna M Wardlaw
{"title":"评估基于地图集的前额叶脑区划分在老年群体中的表现。","authors":"Benjamin S Aribisala, Simon R Cox, Karen J Ferguson, Sarah E MacPherson, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Natalie A Royle, Maria C Valdés Hernández, Mark E Bastin, Ian J Deary, Joanna M Wardlaw","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0b013e31828004ea","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is unclear whether atlas-based parcellation is suitable in aging cohorts because age-related brain changes confound the performance of automatic methods. We assessed atlas-based parcellation of the prefrontal lobe in an aging population using visual assessment and volumetric and spatial concordance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an atlas-based approach to parcellate brain MR images of 90 non-demented healthy adults, aged 72.7 ± 0.7 years, and assessed performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Volumetric assessment showed that both single-atlas- and multi-atlas-based methods performed acceptably (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.74-0.76). Spatial overlap measurements showed that multi-atlas (dice coefficient [DC], 0.84) offered an improvement over the single-atlas (DC, 0.75-0.78) approach. Visual assessment also showed that multi-atlas outperformed single atlas and identified an additional postprocessing step of cerebrospinal fluid removal, enhancing concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.86; DC, 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Atlas-based parcellation performed reasonably well in the aging population. Rigorous performance assessment aided method refinement and emphasizes the importance of age matching and postprocessing. Further work is required in more varied subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":"37 2","pages":"257-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836171/pdf/emss-54812.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the performance of atlas-based prefrontal brain parcellation in an aging cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin S Aribisala, Simon R Cox, Karen J Ferguson, Sarah E MacPherson, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Natalie A Royle, Maria C Valdés Hernández, Mark E Bastin, Ian J Deary, Joanna M Wardlaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RCT.0b013e31828004ea\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is unclear whether atlas-based parcellation is suitable in aging cohorts because age-related brain changes confound the performance of automatic methods. We assessed atlas-based parcellation of the prefrontal lobe in an aging population using visual assessment and volumetric and spatial concordance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an atlas-based approach to parcellate brain MR images of 90 non-demented healthy adults, aged 72.7 ± 0.7 years, and assessed performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Volumetric assessment showed that both single-atlas- and multi-atlas-based methods performed acceptably (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.74-0.76). Spatial overlap measurements showed that multi-atlas (dice coefficient [DC], 0.84) offered an improvement over the single-atlas (DC, 0.75-0.78) approach. Visual assessment also showed that multi-atlas outperformed single atlas and identified an additional postprocessing step of cerebrospinal fluid removal, enhancing concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.86; DC, 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Atlas-based parcellation performed reasonably well in the aging population. Rigorous performance assessment aided method refinement and emphasizes the importance of age matching and postprocessing. Further work is required in more varied subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"257-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836171/pdf/emss-54812.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e31828004ea\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e31828004ea","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前还不清楚基于地图集的解析是否适用于老年群体,因为与年龄相关的大脑变化会混淆自动方法的性能。我们使用视觉评估以及体积和空间一致性评估了基于地图集的前额叶解析在老龄人群中的应用:我们使用基于图集的方法对 90 名年龄为 72.7 ± 0.7 岁的非痴呆健康成年人的脑部 MR 图像进行了分割,并对其性能进行了评估:容积评估结果表明,基于单图集和多图集的方法性能均可接受(类内相关系数 [ICC],0.74-0.76)。空间重叠测量显示,多图集(骰子系数 [DC],0.84)比单图集(DC,0.75-0.78)方法有所改进。目测评估还显示,多图谱的效果优于单图谱,并确定了去除脑脊液的额外后处理步骤,提高了一致性(类内相关系数,0.86;骰系数,0.89):结论:基于图谱的准分子定位在老龄人群中表现良好。严格的性能评估有助于改进方法,并强调了年龄匹配和后处理的重要性。还需要在更多的研究对象中开展进一步的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the performance of atlas-based prefrontal brain parcellation in an aging cohort.

Objective: It is unclear whether atlas-based parcellation is suitable in aging cohorts because age-related brain changes confound the performance of automatic methods. We assessed atlas-based parcellation of the prefrontal lobe in an aging population using visual assessment and volumetric and spatial concordance.

Methods: We used an atlas-based approach to parcellate brain MR images of 90 non-demented healthy adults, aged 72.7 ± 0.7 years, and assessed performance.

Results: Volumetric assessment showed that both single-atlas- and multi-atlas-based methods performed acceptably (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.74-0.76). Spatial overlap measurements showed that multi-atlas (dice coefficient [DC], 0.84) offered an improvement over the single-atlas (DC, 0.75-0.78) approach. Visual assessment also showed that multi-atlas outperformed single atlas and identified an additional postprocessing step of cerebrospinal fluid removal, enhancing concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.86; DC, 0.89).

Conclusions: Atlas-based parcellation performed reasonably well in the aging population. Rigorous performance assessment aided method refinement and emphasizes the importance of age matching and postprocessing. Further work is required in more varied subjects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信