文章长度对未来引用次数的影响:普通医学期刊的文献计量学分析。

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-02-06 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0049476
Matthew E Falagas, Angeliki Zarkali, Drosos E Karageorgopoulos, Vangelis Bardakas, Michael N Mavros
{"title":"文章长度对未来引用次数的影响:普通医学期刊的文献计量学分析。","authors":"Matthew E Falagas,&nbsp;Angeliki Zarkali,&nbsp;Drosos E Karageorgopoulos,&nbsp;Vangelis Bardakas,&nbsp;Michael N Mavros","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0049476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of citations received is considered an index of study quality and impact. We aimed to examine the factors associated with the number of citations of published articles, focusing on the article length.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Original human studies published in the first trimester of 2006 in 5 major General Medicine journals were analyzed with regard to the number of authors and of author-affiliated institutions, title and abstract word count, article length (number of print pages), number of bibliographic references, study design, and 2006 journal impact factor (JIF). A multiple linear regression model was employed to identify the variables independently associated with the number of article citations received through January 2012.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On univariate analysis the JIF, number of authors, article length, study design (interventional/observational and prospective/retrospective), title and abstract word count, number of author-affiliated institutions, and number of references were all associated with the number of citations received. On multivariate analysis with the logarithm of citations as the dependent variable, only article length [regression coefficient: 14.64 (95% confidence intervals: (5.76-23.50)] and JIF [3.37 (1.80-4.948)] independently predicted the number of citations. The variance of citations explained by these parameters was 51.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a sample of articles published in major General Medicine journals, in addition to journal impact factors, article length and number of authors independently predicted the number of citations. This may reflect a higher complexity level and quality of longer and multi-authored studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":" ","pages":"e49476"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pone.0049476","citationCount":"151","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of article length on the number of future citations: a bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew E Falagas,&nbsp;Angeliki Zarkali,&nbsp;Drosos E Karageorgopoulos,&nbsp;Vangelis Bardakas,&nbsp;Michael N Mavros\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0049476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of citations received is considered an index of study quality and impact. We aimed to examine the factors associated with the number of citations of published articles, focusing on the article length.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Original human studies published in the first trimester of 2006 in 5 major General Medicine journals were analyzed with regard to the number of authors and of author-affiliated institutions, title and abstract word count, article length (number of print pages), number of bibliographic references, study design, and 2006 journal impact factor (JIF). A multiple linear regression model was employed to identify the variables independently associated with the number of article citations received through January 2012.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On univariate analysis the JIF, number of authors, article length, study design (interventional/observational and prospective/retrospective), title and abstract word count, number of author-affiliated institutions, and number of references were all associated with the number of citations received. On multivariate analysis with the logarithm of citations as the dependent variable, only article length [regression coefficient: 14.64 (95% confidence intervals: (5.76-23.50)] and JIF [3.37 (1.80-4.948)] independently predicted the number of citations. The variance of citations explained by these parameters was 51.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a sample of articles published in major General Medicine journals, in addition to journal impact factors, article length and number of authors independently predicted the number of citations. This may reflect a higher complexity level and quality of longer and multi-authored studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e49476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pone.0049476\",\"citationCount\":\"151\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049476\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/2/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 151

摘要

背景:被引用的次数被认为是研究质量和影响的一个指标。我们的目的是研究与发表文章的引用次数相关的因素,重点是文章的长度。方法:对2006年上半年发表在5家主要综合医学期刊上的原始人类研究进行分析,包括作者数量和作者所属机构数量、标题和摘要字数、文章长度(打印页数)、参考文献数量、研究设计和2006年期刊影响因子(JIF)。采用多元线性回归模型识别截至2012年1月与文章引用数独立相关的变量。结果:在单因素分析中,JIF、作者数量、文章长度、研究设计(干预性/观察性和前瞻性/回顾性)、标题和摘要字数、作者所属机构数量和参考文献数量均与被引次数相关。在以引用对数为因变量的多变量分析中,只有文章长度[回归系数:14.64(95%置信区间:(5.76 ~ 23.50)]和JIF[3.37(1.80 ~ 4.948)]能独立预测被引次数。这些参数解释的引文方差为51.2%。结论:在主要全科医学期刊发表的文章样本中,除了期刊影响因子外,文章长度和作者数量独立预测了被引次数。这可能反映了较长时间和多作者研究的更高复杂性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The impact of article length on the number of future citations: a bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals.

The impact of article length on the number of future citations: a bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals.

The impact of article length on the number of future citations: a bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals.

The impact of article length on the number of future citations: a bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals.

Background: The number of citations received is considered an index of study quality and impact. We aimed to examine the factors associated with the number of citations of published articles, focusing on the article length.

Methods: Original human studies published in the first trimester of 2006 in 5 major General Medicine journals were analyzed with regard to the number of authors and of author-affiliated institutions, title and abstract word count, article length (number of print pages), number of bibliographic references, study design, and 2006 journal impact factor (JIF). A multiple linear regression model was employed to identify the variables independently associated with the number of article citations received through January 2012.

Results: On univariate analysis the JIF, number of authors, article length, study design (interventional/observational and prospective/retrospective), title and abstract word count, number of author-affiliated institutions, and number of references were all associated with the number of citations received. On multivariate analysis with the logarithm of citations as the dependent variable, only article length [regression coefficient: 14.64 (95% confidence intervals: (5.76-23.50)] and JIF [3.37 (1.80-4.948)] independently predicted the number of citations. The variance of citations explained by these parameters was 51.2%.

Conclusion: In a sample of articles published in major General Medicine journals, in addition to journal impact factors, article length and number of authors independently predicted the number of citations. This may reflect a higher complexity level and quality of longer and multi-authored studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信