评估射频设备对病态肥胖患者手术海绵残留检测的敏感性。

Victoria M Steelman, Mohammad H Alasagheirin
{"title":"评估射频设备对病态肥胖患者手术海绵残留检测的敏感性。","authors":"Victoria M Steelman,&nbsp;Mohammad H Alasagheirin","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Retained surgical sponges are serious medical errors that result in negative patient outcomes. A radiofrequency (RF) mat for the operating room bed has recently been introduced to detect the presence of a retained surgical sponge. The study objectives were to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the RF mat for the detection of surgical sponges through the torso of individuals with varying body habitus and to compare the sensitivity of the RF mat with that of the RF wand. We hypothesized that the sensitivity and specificity of the RF technology would be comparable to published findings of the manual sponge count by operating room personnel.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, crossover, double-blinded study design was used. Participants served as their own controls. SETTING Large Midwestern academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>In total, the first phase of the study enrolled 203 participants, including 129 (63.5%) with morbid obesity. One hundred seventeen of 203 participants were also enrolled in the second phase of the study.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The study participants reclined in a supine position on top of an RF mat. Four surgical sponges were sequentially placed on top of the torso in locations approximating the abdominal quadrants. The torso was scanned for sponges. In a subset of participants, 4 surgical sponges were sequentially placed underneath the torso, and an RF wand was passed over the abdomen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 812 readings were obtained with the RF mat, and 468 readings were obtained with the RF wand. Twelve false-negative readings were obtained with the RF mat, exclusively in participants with super morbid obesity (body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared] >50.0). Overall, the sensitivity of the RF mat was 98.1%, and the specificity of the RF mat was 100.0%. In the subset of 117 participants in whom the RF wand was also used, the sensitivity and specificity of the wand were each 100.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sensitivity and specificity of RF device technology are much higher than those of surgical sponge counts or published findings on the use of intraoperative radiographs to identify retained surgical sponges. The RF wand is more sensitive than the RF mat in individuals with morbid obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 10","pages":"955-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1556","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria M Steelman,&nbsp;Mohammad H Alasagheirin\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Retained surgical sponges are serious medical errors that result in negative patient outcomes. A radiofrequency (RF) mat for the operating room bed has recently been introduced to detect the presence of a retained surgical sponge. The study objectives were to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the RF mat for the detection of surgical sponges through the torso of individuals with varying body habitus and to compare the sensitivity of the RF mat with that of the RF wand. We hypothesized that the sensitivity and specificity of the RF technology would be comparable to published findings of the manual sponge count by operating room personnel.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, crossover, double-blinded study design was used. Participants served as their own controls. SETTING Large Midwestern academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>In total, the first phase of the study enrolled 203 participants, including 129 (63.5%) with morbid obesity. One hundred seventeen of 203 participants were also enrolled in the second phase of the study.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The study participants reclined in a supine position on top of an RF mat. Four surgical sponges were sequentially placed on top of the torso in locations approximating the abdominal quadrants. The torso was scanned for sponges. In a subset of participants, 4 surgical sponges were sequentially placed underneath the torso, and an RF wand was passed over the abdomen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 812 readings were obtained with the RF mat, and 468 readings were obtained with the RF wand. Twelve false-negative readings were obtained with the RF mat, exclusively in participants with super morbid obesity (body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared] >50.0). Overall, the sensitivity of the RF mat was 98.1%, and the specificity of the RF mat was 100.0%. In the subset of 117 participants in whom the RF wand was also used, the sensitivity and specificity of the wand were each 100.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sensitivity and specificity of RF device technology are much higher than those of surgical sponge counts or published findings on the use of intraoperative radiographs to identify retained surgical sponges. The RF wand is more sensitive than the RF mat in individuals with morbid obesity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"147 10\",\"pages\":\"955-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1556\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

摘要

假设:保留手术海绵是严重的医疗错误,导致患者的负面结果。一种用于手术室床的射频(RF)垫最近被引入,用于检测是否存在残留的手术海绵。研究的目的是评估射频垫检测手术海绵的灵敏度和特异性,通过不同身体习惯的个体的躯干,并比较射频垫和射频棒的灵敏度。我们假设射频技术的灵敏度和特异性可与已发表的手术室人员手工海绵计数结果相媲美。设计:采用前瞻性、交叉、双盲研究设计。参与者作为他们自己的对照。大型中西部学术医疗中心。参与者:该研究的第一阶段总共招募了203名参与者,其中包括129名(63.5%)病态肥胖患者。203名参与者中的117人也参加了第二阶段的研究。主要结果测量:研究参与者以仰卧位躺在射频垫上。四个手术海绵依次放置在躯干顶部接近腹部象限的位置。躯干被扫描以寻找海绵。在一部分参与者中,4块手术海绵依次放置在躯干下方,射频棒在腹部上方传递。结果:总的来说,射频垫获得了812个读数,射频棒获得了468个读数。使用射频垫获得了12个假阴性读数,仅适用于超级病态肥胖的参与者(体重指数[计算方法为体重(公斤)除以身高(米)的平方]>50.0)。总体而言,RF mat的敏感性为98.1%,特异性为100.0%。在117名同时使用射频棒的参与者中,该棒的敏感性和特异性均为100.0%。结论:射频装置技术的敏感性和特异性远高于手术海绵计数或术中使用x线片识别残留手术海绵的研究结果。在病态肥胖患者中,射频棒比射频垫更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity.

Hypothesis: Retained surgical sponges are serious medical errors that result in negative patient outcomes. A radiofrequency (RF) mat for the operating room bed has recently been introduced to detect the presence of a retained surgical sponge. The study objectives were to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the RF mat for the detection of surgical sponges through the torso of individuals with varying body habitus and to compare the sensitivity of the RF mat with that of the RF wand. We hypothesized that the sensitivity and specificity of the RF technology would be comparable to published findings of the manual sponge count by operating room personnel.

Design: A prospective, crossover, double-blinded study design was used. Participants served as their own controls. SETTING Large Midwestern academic medical center.

Participants: In total, the first phase of the study enrolled 203 participants, including 129 (63.5%) with morbid obesity. One hundred seventeen of 203 participants were also enrolled in the second phase of the study.

Main outcome measures: The study participants reclined in a supine position on top of an RF mat. Four surgical sponges were sequentially placed on top of the torso in locations approximating the abdominal quadrants. The torso was scanned for sponges. In a subset of participants, 4 surgical sponges were sequentially placed underneath the torso, and an RF wand was passed over the abdomen.

Results: Overall, 812 readings were obtained with the RF mat, and 468 readings were obtained with the RF wand. Twelve false-negative readings were obtained with the RF mat, exclusively in participants with super morbid obesity (body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared] >50.0). Overall, the sensitivity of the RF mat was 98.1%, and the specificity of the RF mat was 100.0%. In the subset of 117 participants in whom the RF wand was also used, the sensitivity and specificity of the wand were each 100.0%.

Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of RF device technology are much higher than those of surgical sponge counts or published findings on the use of intraoperative radiographs to identify retained surgical sponges. The RF wand is more sensitive than the RF mat in individuals with morbid obesity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Surgery
Archives of Surgery 医学-外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信