Marko Bukur, Matthew B Singer, Rex Chung, Eric J Ley, Darren J Malinoski, Daniel R Margulies, Ali Salim
{"title":"住院医师介入对创伤护理结果的影响。","authors":"Marko Bukur, Matthew B Singer, Rex Chung, Eric J Ley, Darren J Malinoski, Daniel R Margulies, Ali Salim","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Discrepancies exist in complications and outcomes at teaching trauma centers (TTCs) vs nonteaching TCs (NTCs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review of the National Trauma Data Bank research data sets (January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2008).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level II TCs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients at TTCs were compared with patients at NTCs using demographic, clinical, and outcome data. Regression modeling was used to adjust for confounding factors to determine the effect of house staff presence on failure to rescue, defined as mortality after an in-house complication.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome measures were major complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 162 687 patients were available for analysis, 36 713 of whom (22.6%) were admitted to NTCs. Compared with patients admitted to TTCs, patients admitted to NTCs were older (52.8 vs 50.7 years), had more severe head injuries (8.3% vs 7.8%), and were more likely to undergo immediate operation (15.0% vs 13.2%) or ICU admission (28.1% vs 22.8%) (P < .01 for all). The mean Injury Severity Scores were similar between the groups (10.1 for patients admitted to NTCs vs 10.4 for patients admitted to TTCs, P < .01). Compared with patients admitted to TTCs, patients admitted to NTCs experienced fewer complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.63; P < .01), had a lower adjusted mortality rate (aOR, 0.87; P = .01), and were less likely to experience failure to rescue (aOR, 0.81; P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Admission to level II TTCs is associated with an increased risk for major complications and a higher rate of failure to rescue compared with admission to level II NTCs. Further investigation of the differences in care provided by level II TTCs vs NTCs may identify areas for improvement in residency training and processes of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 9","pages":"856-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1672","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of resident involvement on trauma care outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Marko Bukur, Matthew B Singer, Rex Chung, Eric J Ley, Darren J Malinoski, Daniel R Margulies, Ali Salim\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Discrepancies exist in complications and outcomes at teaching trauma centers (TTCs) vs nonteaching TCs (NTCs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review of the National Trauma Data Bank research data sets (January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2008).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level II TCs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients at TTCs were compared with patients at NTCs using demographic, clinical, and outcome data. Regression modeling was used to adjust for confounding factors to determine the effect of house staff presence on failure to rescue, defined as mortality after an in-house complication.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome measures were major complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 162 687 patients were available for analysis, 36 713 of whom (22.6%) were admitted to NTCs. Compared with patients admitted to TTCs, patients admitted to NTCs were older (52.8 vs 50.7 years), had more severe head injuries (8.3% vs 7.8%), and were more likely to undergo immediate operation (15.0% vs 13.2%) or ICU admission (28.1% vs 22.8%) (P < .01 for all). The mean Injury Severity Scores were similar between the groups (10.1 for patients admitted to NTCs vs 10.4 for patients admitted to TTCs, P < .01). Compared with patients admitted to TTCs, patients admitted to NTCs experienced fewer complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.63; P < .01), had a lower adjusted mortality rate (aOR, 0.87; P = .01), and were less likely to experience failure to rescue (aOR, 0.81; P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Admission to level II TTCs is associated with an increased risk for major complications and a higher rate of failure to rescue compared with admission to level II NTCs. Further investigation of the differences in care provided by level II TTCs vs NTCs may identify areas for improvement in residency training and processes of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"147 9\",\"pages\":\"856-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1672\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1672\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31
摘要
假设:教学创伤中心(TTCs)与非教学创伤中心(ntc)在并发症和预后方面存在差异。设计:回顾性回顾国家创伤数据库研究数据集(2007年1月1日至2008年12月31日)。设置:II级tc。患者:使用人口统计学、临床和结局数据将TTCs的患者与ntc的患者进行比较。回归模型用于调整混杂因素,以确定医护人员在场对抢救失败的影响,抢救失败定义为院内并发症后的死亡率。主要结局指标:主要结局指标为主要并发症、住院死亡率和抢救失败。结果:共有16687例患者可用于分析,其中36713例(22.6%)为ntc患者。与入住TTCs的患者相比,入住ntc的患者年龄更大(52.8岁vs 50.7岁),头部损伤更严重(8.3% vs 7.8%),更容易立即手术(15.0% vs 13.2%)或入住ICU (28.1% vs 22.8%)(均P < 0.01)。两组间的平均损伤严重程度评分相似(ntc患者为10.1分,TTCs患者为10.4分,P < 0.01)。与接受TTCs的患者相比,接受ntc的患者并发症较少(调整优势比[aOR], 0.63;P < 0.01),校正死亡率较低(aOR, 0.87;P = 0.01),且较不容易出现抢救失败(aOR, 0.81;P = 0.01)。结论:与入住II级ntc相比,入住II级TTCs与主要并发症的风险增加和更高的抢救失败率相关。对二级TTCs与ntc提供的护理差异的进一步调查可能会确定住院医师培训和护理过程中需要改进的领域。
Influence of resident involvement on trauma care outcomes.
Hypothesis: Discrepancies exist in complications and outcomes at teaching trauma centers (TTCs) vs nonteaching TCs (NTCs).
Design: Retrospective review of the National Trauma Data Bank research data sets (January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2008).
Setting: Level II TCs.
Patients: Patients at TTCs were compared with patients at NTCs using demographic, clinical, and outcome data. Regression modeling was used to adjust for confounding factors to determine the effect of house staff presence on failure to rescue, defined as mortality after an in-house complication.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measures were major complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue.
Results: In total, 162 687 patients were available for analysis, 36 713 of whom (22.6%) were admitted to NTCs. Compared with patients admitted to TTCs, patients admitted to NTCs were older (52.8 vs 50.7 years), had more severe head injuries (8.3% vs 7.8%), and were more likely to undergo immediate operation (15.0% vs 13.2%) or ICU admission (28.1% vs 22.8%) (P < .01 for all). The mean Injury Severity Scores were similar between the groups (10.1 for patients admitted to NTCs vs 10.4 for patients admitted to TTCs, P < .01). Compared with patients admitted to TTCs, patients admitted to NTCs experienced fewer complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.63; P < .01), had a lower adjusted mortality rate (aOR, 0.87; P = .01), and were less likely to experience failure to rescue (aOR, 0.81; P = .01).
Conclusions: Admission to level II TTCs is associated with an increased risk for major complications and a higher rate of failure to rescue compared with admission to level II NTCs. Further investigation of the differences in care provided by level II TTCs vs NTCs may identify areas for improvement in residency training and processes of care.