中风的第1027个候选靶点:NADPH氧化酶会保持下去吗?

Kim A Radermacher, Kirstin Wingler, Pamela Kleikers, Sebastian Altenhöfer, Johannes Jr Hermans, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Harald Hhw Schmidt
{"title":"中风的第1027个候选靶点:NADPH氧化酶会保持下去吗?","authors":"Kim A Radermacher,&nbsp;Kirstin Wingler,&nbsp;Pamela Kleikers,&nbsp;Sebastian Altenhöfer,&nbsp;Johannes Jr Hermans,&nbsp;Christoph Kleinschnitz,&nbsp;Harald Hhw Schmidt","doi":"10.1186/2040-7378-4-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p> As recently reviewed, 1026 neuroprotective drug candidates in stroke research have all failed on their road towards validation and clinical translation, reasons being quality issues in preclinical research and publication bias. Quality control guidelines for preclinical stroke studies have now been established. However, sufficient understanding of the underlying mechanisms of neuronal death after stroke that could be possibly translated into new therapies is lacking. One exception is the hypothesis that cellular death is mediated by oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is defined as an excess of reactive oxygen species (ROS) derived from different possible enzymatic sources. Among these, NADPH oxidases (NOX1-5) stand out as they represent the only known enzyme family that has no other function than to produce ROS. Based on data from different NOX knockout mouse models in ischemic stroke, the most relevant isoform appears to be NOX4. Here we discuss the state-of-the-art of this target with respect to stroke and open questions that need to be addressed on the path towards clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12158,"journal":{"name":"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2040-7378-4-11","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 1027th target candidate in stroke: Will NADPH oxidase hold up?\",\"authors\":\"Kim A Radermacher,&nbsp;Kirstin Wingler,&nbsp;Pamela Kleikers,&nbsp;Sebastian Altenhöfer,&nbsp;Johannes Jr Hermans,&nbsp;Christoph Kleinschnitz,&nbsp;Harald Hhw Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/2040-7378-4-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p> As recently reviewed, 1026 neuroprotective drug candidates in stroke research have all failed on their road towards validation and clinical translation, reasons being quality issues in preclinical research and publication bias. Quality control guidelines for preclinical stroke studies have now been established. However, sufficient understanding of the underlying mechanisms of neuronal death after stroke that could be possibly translated into new therapies is lacking. One exception is the hypothesis that cellular death is mediated by oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is defined as an excess of reactive oxygen species (ROS) derived from different possible enzymatic sources. Among these, NADPH oxidases (NOX1-5) stand out as they represent the only known enzyme family that has no other function than to produce ROS. Based on data from different NOX knockout mouse models in ischemic stroke, the most relevant isoform appears to be NOX4. Here we discuss the state-of-the-art of this target with respect to stroke and open questions that need to be addressed on the path towards clinical translation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2040-7378-4-11\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-7378-4-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-7378-4-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

正如最近回顾的那样,1026种用于中风研究的神经保护候选药物在验证和临床转化的道路上都失败了,原因是临床前研究的质量问题和发表偏倚。临床前卒中研究的质量控制指南现已建立。然而,对中风后神经元死亡的潜在机制的充分理解可能转化为新的治疗方法是缺乏的。一个例外是细胞死亡是由氧化应激介导的假设。氧化应激被定义为来自不同可能的酶源的活性氧(ROS)过量。其中,NADPH氧化酶(NOX1-5)尤为突出,因为它们是唯一已知的除了产生ROS之外没有其他功能的酶家族。根据缺血性卒中中不同NOX敲除小鼠模型的数据,最相关的亚型似乎是NOX4。在这里,我们讨论关于中风和需要解决的开放性问题,在走向临床翻译的道路上这一目标的最新技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The 1027th target candidate in stroke: Will NADPH oxidase hold up?

As recently reviewed, 1026 neuroprotective drug candidates in stroke research have all failed on their road towards validation and clinical translation, reasons being quality issues in preclinical research and publication bias. Quality control guidelines for preclinical stroke studies have now been established. However, sufficient understanding of the underlying mechanisms of neuronal death after stroke that could be possibly translated into new therapies is lacking. One exception is the hypothesis that cellular death is mediated by oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is defined as an excess of reactive oxygen species (ROS) derived from different possible enzymatic sources. Among these, NADPH oxidases (NOX1-5) stand out as they represent the only known enzyme family that has no other function than to produce ROS. Based on data from different NOX knockout mouse models in ischemic stroke, the most relevant isoform appears to be NOX4. Here we discuss the state-of-the-art of this target with respect to stroke and open questions that need to be addressed on the path towards clinical translation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信