中等分数组听障儿童的语言能力。

Akiko Sugaya, Kunihiro Fukushima, Norio Kasai, Akie Fujiyoshi, Tomoko Taguchi, Kana Omori, Toshiyuki Ojima, Kazunori Nishizaki
{"title":"中等分数组听障儿童的语言能力。","authors":"Akiko Sugaya,&nbsp;Kunihiro Fukushima,&nbsp;Norio Kasai,&nbsp;Akie Fujiyoshi,&nbsp;Tomoko Taguchi,&nbsp;Kana Omori,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Ojima,&nbsp;Kazunori Nishizaki","doi":"10.1177/000348941212100403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Language development is a key issue in hearing-impaired children. However, interpersonal differences complicate our understanding of the situation. The bimodal or trimodal distribution of language scores in our other reports in this publication imply the presence of fundamental differences among these groups. The characteristic aspects of each group were profiled according to language data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We divided 268 children with prelingual severe to profound hearing impairment into 3 groups according to their trimodal distribution observed on histogram-based analysis of their responses to the Test of Question-Answer Interaction Development. Test results in several language domains, including productive and comprehensive vocabulary, productive and comprehensive syntax, and academic achievement, were profiled and compared among these 3 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in the results of the Word Fluency Test, the Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised, and the Syntax Test of Aphasia among the 3 groups. No significant difference was observed between groups who were lower-scoring and intermediate-scoring on the academic achievement tests referred to as Criterion Referenced Test-II and the Standardized Comprehension Test for Abstract Words. Only the higher-scoring group showed excellent results. The demographic factors were not significantly different among the 3 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relatively poor academic achievement despite fair language production was the dominant feature of the intermediate-scoring group. This profile might correlate with academic failure in school.</p>","PeriodicalId":76600,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement","volume":"202 ","pages":"21-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/000348941212100403","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language ability in the intermediate-scoring group of hearing-impaired children.\",\"authors\":\"Akiko Sugaya,&nbsp;Kunihiro Fukushima,&nbsp;Norio Kasai,&nbsp;Akie Fujiyoshi,&nbsp;Tomoko Taguchi,&nbsp;Kana Omori,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Ojima,&nbsp;Kazunori Nishizaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/000348941212100403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Language development is a key issue in hearing-impaired children. However, interpersonal differences complicate our understanding of the situation. The bimodal or trimodal distribution of language scores in our other reports in this publication imply the presence of fundamental differences among these groups. The characteristic aspects of each group were profiled according to language data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We divided 268 children with prelingual severe to profound hearing impairment into 3 groups according to their trimodal distribution observed on histogram-based analysis of their responses to the Test of Question-Answer Interaction Development. Test results in several language domains, including productive and comprehensive vocabulary, productive and comprehensive syntax, and academic achievement, were profiled and compared among these 3 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in the results of the Word Fluency Test, the Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised, and the Syntax Test of Aphasia among the 3 groups. No significant difference was observed between groups who were lower-scoring and intermediate-scoring on the academic achievement tests referred to as Criterion Referenced Test-II and the Standardized Comprehension Test for Abstract Words. Only the higher-scoring group showed excellent results. The demographic factors were not significantly different among the 3 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relatively poor academic achievement despite fair language production was the dominant feature of the intermediate-scoring group. This profile might correlate with academic failure in school.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"21-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/000348941212100403\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941212100403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941212100403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:语言发展是听障儿童的一个关键问题。然而,人际差异使我们对这种情况的理解复杂化了。在本出版物的其他报告中,语言分数的双峰或三峰分布暗示了这些群体之间存在根本差异。根据语言资料对每一组的特征方面进行了分析。方法:对268例语前重度至重度听力障碍患儿的问答互动发展测试结果进行直方图分析,根据其三模态分布将其分为3组。在几个语言领域的测试结果,包括生产性和综合词汇,生产性和综合句法,以及学术成就,被描述和比较在这三个组。结果:三组学生在单词流畅性测试、图片词汇测试和失语症语法测试的结果均有显著差异。在学业成就测试(即标准参考测试- ii和抽象词汇标准化理解测试)中,得分较低的组和得分中等的组之间没有观察到显著差异。只有得分较高的一组表现出优异的成绩。3组间人口学因素差异无统计学意义。结论:中等得分组的主要特征是学业成绩相对较差,但语言能力良好。这可能与学校的学业失败有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Language ability in the intermediate-scoring group of hearing-impaired children.

Objectives: Language development is a key issue in hearing-impaired children. However, interpersonal differences complicate our understanding of the situation. The bimodal or trimodal distribution of language scores in our other reports in this publication imply the presence of fundamental differences among these groups. The characteristic aspects of each group were profiled according to language data.

Methods: We divided 268 children with prelingual severe to profound hearing impairment into 3 groups according to their trimodal distribution observed on histogram-based analysis of their responses to the Test of Question-Answer Interaction Development. Test results in several language domains, including productive and comprehensive vocabulary, productive and comprehensive syntax, and academic achievement, were profiled and compared among these 3 groups.

Results: Significant differences were observed in the results of the Word Fluency Test, the Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised, and the Syntax Test of Aphasia among the 3 groups. No significant difference was observed between groups who were lower-scoring and intermediate-scoring on the academic achievement tests referred to as Criterion Referenced Test-II and the Standardized Comprehension Test for Abstract Words. Only the higher-scoring group showed excellent results. The demographic factors were not significantly different among the 3 groups.

Conclusions: Relatively poor academic achievement despite fair language production was the dominant feature of the intermediate-scoring group. This profile might correlate with academic failure in school.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信