为澳大利亚灾害医疗援助队提供的后勤支持:对队员进行的全国调查的结果。

Emerging health threats journal Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-02-13 DOI:10.3402/ehtj.v5i0.9750
Peter Aitken, Peter Leggat, Hazel Harley, Richard Speare, Muriel Leclercq
{"title":"为澳大利亚灾害医疗援助队提供的后勤支持:对队员进行的全国调查的结果。","authors":"Peter Aitken, Peter Leggat, Hazel Harley, Richard Speare, Muriel Leclercq","doi":"10.3402/ehtj.v5i0.9750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is likely that calls for disaster medical assistance teams (DMATs) continue in response to international disasters. As part of a national survey, the present study was designed to evaluate the Australian DMAT experience and the need for logistic support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected via an anonymous mailed survey distributed via State and Territory representatives on the Australian Health Protection Committee, who identified team members associated with Australian DMAT deployments from the 2004 Asian Tsunami disaster.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate for this survey was 50% (59/118). Most of the personnel had deployed to the South East Asian Tsunami affected areas. The DMAT members had significant clinical and international experience. There was unanimous support for dedicated logistic support with 80% (47/59) strongly agreeing. Only one respondent (2%) disagreed with teams being self sufficient for a minimum of 72 hours. Most felt that transport around the site was not a problem (59%; 35/59), however, 34% (20/59) felt that transport to the site itself was problematic. Only 37% (22/59) felt that pre-deployment information was accurate. Communication with local health providers and other agencies was felt to be adequate by 53% (31/59) and 47% (28/59) respectively, while only 28% (17/59) felt that documentation methods were easy to use and reliable. Less than half (47%; 28/59) felt that equipment could be moved easily between areas by team members and 37% (22/59) that packaging enabled materials to be found easily. The maximum safe container weight was felt to be between 20 and 40 kg by 58% (34/59).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study emphasises the importance of dedicated logistic support for DMAT and the need for teams to be self sufficient for a minimum period of 72 hours. There is a need for accurate pre deployment information to guide resource prioritisation with clearly labelled pre packaging to assist access on site. Container weights should be restricted to between 20 and 40 kg, which would assist transport around the site, while transport to the site was seen as problematic. There was also support for training of all team members in use of basic equipment such as communications equipment, tents and shelters and water purification systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":72898,"journal":{"name":"Emerging health threats journal","volume":"5 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/76/EHTJ-5-9750.PMC3280040.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Logistic support provided to Australian disaster medical assistance teams: results of a national survey of team members.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Aitken, Peter Leggat, Hazel Harley, Richard Speare, Muriel Leclercq\",\"doi\":\"10.3402/ehtj.v5i0.9750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is likely that calls for disaster medical assistance teams (DMATs) continue in response to international disasters. As part of a national survey, the present study was designed to evaluate the Australian DMAT experience and the need for logistic support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected via an anonymous mailed survey distributed via State and Territory representatives on the Australian Health Protection Committee, who identified team members associated with Australian DMAT deployments from the 2004 Asian Tsunami disaster.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate for this survey was 50% (59/118). Most of the personnel had deployed to the South East Asian Tsunami affected areas. The DMAT members had significant clinical and international experience. There was unanimous support for dedicated logistic support with 80% (47/59) strongly agreeing. Only one respondent (2%) disagreed with teams being self sufficient for a minimum of 72 hours. Most felt that transport around the site was not a problem (59%; 35/59), however, 34% (20/59) felt that transport to the site itself was problematic. Only 37% (22/59) felt that pre-deployment information was accurate. Communication with local health providers and other agencies was felt to be adequate by 53% (31/59) and 47% (28/59) respectively, while only 28% (17/59) felt that documentation methods were easy to use and reliable. Less than half (47%; 28/59) felt that equipment could be moved easily between areas by team members and 37% (22/59) that packaging enabled materials to be found easily. The maximum safe container weight was felt to be between 20 and 40 kg by 58% (34/59).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study emphasises the importance of dedicated logistic support for DMAT and the need for teams to be self sufficient for a minimum period of 72 hours. There is a need for accurate pre deployment information to guide resource prioritisation with clearly labelled pre packaging to assist access on site. Container weights should be restricted to between 20 and 40 kg, which would assist transport around the site, while transport to the site was seen as problematic. There was also support for training of all team members in use of basic equipment such as communications equipment, tents and shelters and water purification systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerging health threats journal\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/76/EHTJ-5-9750.PMC3280040.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerging health threats journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3402/ehtj.v5i0.9750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging health threats journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/ehtj.v5i0.9750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:灾难医疗援助队(DMAT)很可能会在应对国际灾难时继续出现。作为全国调查的一部分,本研究旨在评估澳大利亚灾难医疗援助队的经验以及对后勤支持的需求:方法:通过匿名邮寄调查表的方式收集数据,调查表通过澳大利亚健康保护委员会的州和地区代表分发,这些代表确认了与澳大利亚在 2004 年亚洲海啸灾难中部署的 DMAT 相关的团队成员:本次调查的回复率为 50%(59/118)。大多数人员都曾被派往东南亚海啸灾区。DMAT 成员拥有丰富的临床和国际经验。80%的受访者(47/59)非常同意提供专门的后勤支持,并获得一致支持。只有一名受访者(2%)不同意小组至少在 72 小时内自给自足。大多数人认为现场周围的交通不成问题(59%;35/59),但有 34%(20/59)的人认为前往现场的交通有问题。只有 37%(22/59)的人认为部署前的信息是准确的。分别有 53%(31/59)和 47%(28/59)的人认为与当地医疗服务提供者和其他机构的沟通是充分的,而只有 28%(17/59)的人认为记录方法易于使用且可靠。不到一半(47%;28/59)的人认为设备可以方便地在团队成员之间移动,37%(22/59)的人认为包装可以方便地找到材料。58%(34/59)的人认为容器的最大安全重量在 20 至 40 公斤之间:这项研究强调了为非杀伤人员地雷行动提供专门后勤支持的重要性,以及小组至少在 72 小时内自给自足的必要性。有必要提供准确的部署前信息,以指导资源的优先排序,并在预包装上贴上清晰的标签,以协助在现场使用。集装箱重量应限制在 20 至 40 千克之间,这将有助于在现场周围的运输,而向现场的运输则被认为是个问题。还支持对所有小组成员进行使用基本设备的培训,如通信设备、帐篷和住所以及净水系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Logistic support provided to Australian disaster medical assistance teams: results of a national survey of team members.

Background: It is likely that calls for disaster medical assistance teams (DMATs) continue in response to international disasters. As part of a national survey, the present study was designed to evaluate the Australian DMAT experience and the need for logistic support.

Methods: Data were collected via an anonymous mailed survey distributed via State and Territory representatives on the Australian Health Protection Committee, who identified team members associated with Australian DMAT deployments from the 2004 Asian Tsunami disaster.

Results: The response rate for this survey was 50% (59/118). Most of the personnel had deployed to the South East Asian Tsunami affected areas. The DMAT members had significant clinical and international experience. There was unanimous support for dedicated logistic support with 80% (47/59) strongly agreeing. Only one respondent (2%) disagreed with teams being self sufficient for a minimum of 72 hours. Most felt that transport around the site was not a problem (59%; 35/59), however, 34% (20/59) felt that transport to the site itself was problematic. Only 37% (22/59) felt that pre-deployment information was accurate. Communication with local health providers and other agencies was felt to be adequate by 53% (31/59) and 47% (28/59) respectively, while only 28% (17/59) felt that documentation methods were easy to use and reliable. Less than half (47%; 28/59) felt that equipment could be moved easily between areas by team members and 37% (22/59) that packaging enabled materials to be found easily. The maximum safe container weight was felt to be between 20 and 40 kg by 58% (34/59).

Conclusions: This study emphasises the importance of dedicated logistic support for DMAT and the need for teams to be self sufficient for a minimum period of 72 hours. There is a need for accurate pre deployment information to guide resource prioritisation with clearly labelled pre packaging to assist access on site. Container weights should be restricted to between 20 and 40 kg, which would assist transport around the site, while transport to the site was seen as problematic. There was also support for training of all team members in use of basic equipment such as communications equipment, tents and shelters and water purification systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信