区分镰状细胞性贫血和镰状细胞特征的新检测方法(镰状确认)在发展中国家的潜在应用。

Tim R Randolph, Jenna Wheelhouse
{"title":"区分镰状细胞性贫血和镰状细胞特征的新检测方法(镰状确认)在发展中国家的潜在应用。","authors":"Tim R Randolph,&nbsp;Jenna Wheelhouse","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to develop a diagnostic testing method to detect HbS, distinguish sickle cell homozygotes from heterozygotes, and overcome testing barriers encountered in laboratories in underdeveloped countries. Blood samples positive and negative for sickle cell were subjected to the standard hemoglobin solubility test followed by a variety of centrifugation and filtration procedures. Each procedure was evaluated for the ability to remove insoluble HbS from the sample. The hemoglobin types that remain (HbA, HbA2 and HbF) were measured spectrophotometrically or estimated visually allowing samples to be categorized into three genotypes (AA, AS and SS) as confirmed by hemoglobin electrophoresis. De-identified EDTA blood samples were obtained from Saint Louis University and Cardinal Glennon Children's hospitals and tested in the Department of Clinical Laboratory Science at Saint Louis University. The main outcome measures were turbidity of the solubility solution; color of the supernatant and the material on the surface of the solution following centrifugation; precipitate trapped on the filter paper; absorbance of the filtrate; and hemoglobin electrophoresis patterns. Centrifugation and filtration successfully separated HbS from HbA/A2/F allowing for the differentiation of seven sickle cell homozygotes from sixteen heterozygotes with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. This method has the potential to reliably distinguish homozygous from heterozygous sickle cell patients and it is fast, inexpensive, and simple. These characteristics make Sickle Confirm a desirable method in developing countries like Haiti and Africa where sickle cell anemia is prevalent and modern diagnostic methods like electrophoresis, HPLC and nucleic acid testing are impractical.</p>","PeriodicalId":72611,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology","volume":" ","pages":"26-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel test method (sickle confirm) to differentiate sickle cell anemia from sickle cell trait for potential use in developing countries.\",\"authors\":\"Tim R Randolph,&nbsp;Jenna Wheelhouse\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to develop a diagnostic testing method to detect HbS, distinguish sickle cell homozygotes from heterozygotes, and overcome testing barriers encountered in laboratories in underdeveloped countries. Blood samples positive and negative for sickle cell were subjected to the standard hemoglobin solubility test followed by a variety of centrifugation and filtration procedures. Each procedure was evaluated for the ability to remove insoluble HbS from the sample. The hemoglobin types that remain (HbA, HbA2 and HbF) were measured spectrophotometrically or estimated visually allowing samples to be categorized into three genotypes (AA, AS and SS) as confirmed by hemoglobin electrophoresis. De-identified EDTA blood samples were obtained from Saint Louis University and Cardinal Glennon Children's hospitals and tested in the Department of Clinical Laboratory Science at Saint Louis University. The main outcome measures were turbidity of the solubility solution; color of the supernatant and the material on the surface of the solution following centrifugation; precipitate trapped on the filter paper; absorbance of the filtrate; and hemoglobin electrophoresis patterns. Centrifugation and filtration successfully separated HbS from HbA/A2/F allowing for the differentiation of seven sickle cell homozygotes from sixteen heterozygotes with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. This method has the potential to reliably distinguish homozygous from heterozygous sickle cell patients and it is fast, inexpensive, and simple. These characteristics make Sickle Confirm a desirable method in developing countries like Haiti and Africa where sickle cell anemia is prevalent and modern diagnostic methods like electrophoresis, HPLC and nucleic acid testing are impractical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"26-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是开发一种诊断检测方法来检测HbS,区分镰状细胞纯合子和杂合子,并克服欠发达国家实验室遇到的检测障碍。镰状细胞阳性和阴性血液样本进行标准血红蛋白溶解度试验,然后进行各种离心和过滤程序。评估每个步骤去除样品中不溶性HbS的能力。剩余的血红蛋白类型(HbA, HbA2和HbF)用分光光度法测量或目测,通过血红蛋白电泳将样品分为三种基因型(AA, AS和SS)。去鉴定的EDTA血液样本来自圣路易斯大学和格伦农红衣主教儿童医院,并在圣路易斯大学临床实验室科学系进行了测试。主要观察指标为溶解度溶液浊度;离心后上清液和溶液表面物质的颜色;沉淀被困在滤纸上;滤液吸光度;血红蛋白电泳图。离心和过滤成功地将HbS从HbA/A2/F中分离出来,从16个杂合子中分化出7个镰状细胞纯合子,灵敏度和特异性为100%。该方法有可能可靠地区分纯合子镰状细胞患者和杂合子镰状细胞患者,并且快速、廉价和简单。这些特点使镰状细胞性贫血在海地和非洲等发展中国家流行,电泳、高效液相色谱和核酸检测等现代诊断方法不切实际,因此镰状细胞确认是一种理想的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel test method (sickle confirm) to differentiate sickle cell anemia from sickle cell trait for potential use in developing countries.

The objective of this study was to develop a diagnostic testing method to detect HbS, distinguish sickle cell homozygotes from heterozygotes, and overcome testing barriers encountered in laboratories in underdeveloped countries. Blood samples positive and negative for sickle cell were subjected to the standard hemoglobin solubility test followed by a variety of centrifugation and filtration procedures. Each procedure was evaluated for the ability to remove insoluble HbS from the sample. The hemoglobin types that remain (HbA, HbA2 and HbF) were measured spectrophotometrically or estimated visually allowing samples to be categorized into three genotypes (AA, AS and SS) as confirmed by hemoglobin electrophoresis. De-identified EDTA blood samples were obtained from Saint Louis University and Cardinal Glennon Children's hospitals and tested in the Department of Clinical Laboratory Science at Saint Louis University. The main outcome measures were turbidity of the solubility solution; color of the supernatant and the material on the surface of the solution following centrifugation; precipitate trapped on the filter paper; absorbance of the filtrate; and hemoglobin electrophoresis patterns. Centrifugation and filtration successfully separated HbS from HbA/A2/F allowing for the differentiation of seven sickle cell homozygotes from sixteen heterozygotes with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. This method has the potential to reliably distinguish homozygous from heterozygous sickle cell patients and it is fast, inexpensive, and simple. These characteristics make Sickle Confirm a desirable method in developing countries like Haiti and Africa where sickle cell anemia is prevalent and modern diagnostic methods like electrophoresis, HPLC and nucleic acid testing are impractical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信