评价血清肌酐和胱抑素c为基础的方程估计肾小球滤过率在中国人群。

Xiao-Hua Pei, Juan He, Qiao Liu, Bei Zhu, Li-Hua Bao, Chen-Jing Yan, Jian-Qing Wu, Wei-Hong Zhao
{"title":"评价血清肌酐和胱抑素c为基础的方程估计肾小球滤过率在中国人群。","authors":"Xiao-Hua Pei,&nbsp;Juan He,&nbsp;Qiao Liu,&nbsp;Bei Zhu,&nbsp;Li-Hua Bao,&nbsp;Chen-Jing Yan,&nbsp;Jian-Qing Wu,&nbsp;Wei-Hong Zhao","doi":"10.3109/00365599.2012.660985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of a selection of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations based on serum creatinine (SCr) and serum cystatin C in a Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Estimated GFR values from 10 equations were compared with reference GFR (rGFR) from the (99m)Tc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method. The study enrolled 569 Chinese participants (41.5% women, 53.5 ± 16.9 years, range 19-92 years), with mean rGFR 74.80 ± 26.10 (range 9.8-146.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bland-Altman analysis illustrated that the 95% agreement limits of all the equations surpassed the acceptable tolerance (<60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), of which the MacIsaac equation was the closest one, reaching 71.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Linear regression analysis also demonstrated a consistent result. When assessed in all participants, the accuracy of the six equations reached and exceeded the acceptable level (≥70%), of which the Shanghai and MacIsaac equations gained more accuracy than others. When compared in subgroups, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), MacIsaac and Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equations were optimal for rGFR stages ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m(2), 30-89 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and < 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrated that further improvement is needed for the selected 10 equations. Not all the cystatin C equations were superior to SCr equations. They have their own applicability at various GFR levels. At present, the CKD-EPI, MacIsaac and CG equations may be applied to evaluate GFR in normal, mild to moderate and severe kidney function, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":21543,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology","volume":"46 3","pages":"223-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365599.2012.660985","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of serum creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in a Chinese population.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Hua Pei,&nbsp;Juan He,&nbsp;Qiao Liu,&nbsp;Bei Zhu,&nbsp;Li-Hua Bao,&nbsp;Chen-Jing Yan,&nbsp;Jian-Qing Wu,&nbsp;Wei-Hong Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/00365599.2012.660985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of a selection of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations based on serum creatinine (SCr) and serum cystatin C in a Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Estimated GFR values from 10 equations were compared with reference GFR (rGFR) from the (99m)Tc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method. The study enrolled 569 Chinese participants (41.5% women, 53.5 ± 16.9 years, range 19-92 years), with mean rGFR 74.80 ± 26.10 (range 9.8-146.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bland-Altman analysis illustrated that the 95% agreement limits of all the equations surpassed the acceptable tolerance (<60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), of which the MacIsaac equation was the closest one, reaching 71.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Linear regression analysis also demonstrated a consistent result. When assessed in all participants, the accuracy of the six equations reached and exceeded the acceptable level (≥70%), of which the Shanghai and MacIsaac equations gained more accuracy than others. When compared in subgroups, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), MacIsaac and Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equations were optimal for rGFR stages ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m(2), 30-89 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and < 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrated that further improvement is needed for the selected 10 equations. Not all the cystatin C equations were superior to SCr equations. They have their own applicability at various GFR levels. At present, the CKD-EPI, MacIsaac and CG equations may be applied to evaluate GFR in normal, mild to moderate and severe kidney function, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"46 3\",\"pages\":\"223-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365599.2012.660985\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2012.660985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2012.660985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评价基于血清肌酐(SCr)和血清胱抑素C的肾小球滤过率(GFR)估算公式在中国人群中的适用性。材料和方法:将10个方程的估计GFR值与(99m)Tc-DTPA肾动态成像方法的参考GFR (rGFR)进行比较。该研究招募了569名中国参与者(41.5%为女性,53.5±16.9岁,范围19-92岁),平均rGFR为74.80±26.10(范围9.8-146.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2))。结果:Bland-Altman分析表明,所有方程的95%一致性限均超过可接受容限(结论:结果表明,所选的10个方程仍需进一步改进。并不是所有的胱抑素C方程都优于SCr方程。它们在不同的GFR水平上有各自的适用性。目前,CKD-EPI、MacIsaac和CG方程可分别用于评估正常、轻中度和重度肾功能患者的GFR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of serum creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in a Chinese population.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of a selection of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations based on serum creatinine (SCr) and serum cystatin C in a Chinese population.

Material and methods: Estimated GFR values from 10 equations were compared with reference GFR (rGFR) from the (99m)Tc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method. The study enrolled 569 Chinese participants (41.5% women, 53.5 ± 16.9 years, range 19-92 years), with mean rGFR 74.80 ± 26.10 (range 9.8-146.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2)).

Results: Bland-Altman analysis illustrated that the 95% agreement limits of all the equations surpassed the acceptable tolerance (<60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), of which the MacIsaac equation was the closest one, reaching 71.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Linear regression analysis also demonstrated a consistent result. When assessed in all participants, the accuracy of the six equations reached and exceeded the acceptable level (≥70%), of which the Shanghai and MacIsaac equations gained more accuracy than others. When compared in subgroups, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), MacIsaac and Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equations were optimal for rGFR stages ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m(2), 30-89 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and < 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively.

Conclusion: The results demonstrated that further improvement is needed for the selected 10 equations. Not all the cystatin C equations were superior to SCr equations. They have their own applicability at various GFR levels. At present, the CKD-EPI, MacIsaac and CG equations may be applied to evaluate GFR in normal, mild to moderate and severe kidney function, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信