人工鼻临床嗅觉试验的特点。

Frontiers in neuroengineering Pub Date : 2012-02-02 eCollection Date: 2011-10-20 DOI:10.3389/fneng.2012.00001
David J Yáñez, Adolfo Toledano, Eduardo Serrano, Ana M Martín de Rosales, Francisco B Rodríguez, Pablo Varona
{"title":"人工鼻临床嗅觉试验的特点。","authors":"David J Yáñez,&nbsp;Adolfo Toledano,&nbsp;Eduardo Serrano,&nbsp;Ana M Martín de Rosales,&nbsp;Francisco B Rodríguez,&nbsp;Pablo Varona","doi":"10.3389/fneng.2012.00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical olfactory tests are used to address hyposmia/anosmia levels in patients with different types of olfactory impairments. Typically, a given test is employed clinically and then replaced by a new one after a certain period of use which can range from days to several months. There is a need to assess control quality of these tests and also for a procedure to quantify their degradation over time. In this paper we propose a protocol to employ low-cost artificial noses for the quantitative characterization of olfactory tests used in clinical studies. In particular, we discuss a preliminary study on the Connecticut Chemosensorial Clinical Research Center Test kit which shows that some odorants, as sensed by an artificial nose, seem to degrade while others are potentiated as the test ages. We also discuss the need to establish a map of correspondence between human and machine olfaction when artificial noses are used to characterize or compare human smell performance in research and clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73093,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neuroengineering","volume":"5 ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3389/fneng.2012.00001","citationCount":"48","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of a clinical olfactory test with an artificial nose.\",\"authors\":\"David J Yáñez,&nbsp;Adolfo Toledano,&nbsp;Eduardo Serrano,&nbsp;Ana M Martín de Rosales,&nbsp;Francisco B Rodríguez,&nbsp;Pablo Varona\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fneng.2012.00001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinical olfactory tests are used to address hyposmia/anosmia levels in patients with different types of olfactory impairments. Typically, a given test is employed clinically and then replaced by a new one after a certain period of use which can range from days to several months. There is a need to assess control quality of these tests and also for a procedure to quantify their degradation over time. In this paper we propose a protocol to employ low-cost artificial noses for the quantitative characterization of olfactory tests used in clinical studies. In particular, we discuss a preliminary study on the Connecticut Chemosensorial Clinical Research Center Test kit which shows that some odorants, as sensed by an artificial nose, seem to degrade while others are potentiated as the test ages. We also discuss the need to establish a map of correspondence between human and machine olfaction when artificial noses are used to characterize or compare human smell performance in research and clinical studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in neuroengineering\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3389/fneng.2012.00001\",\"citationCount\":\"48\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in neuroengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2012.00001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/10/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neuroengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2012.00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

摘要

临床嗅觉测试用于解决不同类型嗅觉障碍患者的低嗅觉/嗅觉缺失水平。通常,一个给定的测试在临床上使用,然后在使用一段时间后被一个新的测试所取代,这段时间可能从几天到几个月。有必要评估这些测试的控制质量,也有必要制定一种程序,量化它们随时间的退化。在本文中,我们提出了一种方案,采用低成本的人工鼻子的定量表征嗅觉测试用于临床研究。特别是,我们讨论了康涅狄格化学感官临床研究中心测试试剂盒的初步研究,该研究表明,随着测试时间的推移,人工鼻子感知的一些气味似乎会减弱,而其他气味则会增强。我们还讨论了在研究和临床研究中使用人工鼻子来表征或比较人类嗅觉表现时,建立人类和机器嗅觉对应图的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Characterization of a clinical olfactory test with an artificial nose.

Characterization of a clinical olfactory test with an artificial nose.

Characterization of a clinical olfactory test with an artificial nose.

Characterization of a clinical olfactory test with an artificial nose.

Clinical olfactory tests are used to address hyposmia/anosmia levels in patients with different types of olfactory impairments. Typically, a given test is employed clinically and then replaced by a new one after a certain period of use which can range from days to several months. There is a need to assess control quality of these tests and also for a procedure to quantify their degradation over time. In this paper we propose a protocol to employ low-cost artificial noses for the quantitative characterization of olfactory tests used in clinical studies. In particular, we discuss a preliminary study on the Connecticut Chemosensorial Clinical Research Center Test kit which shows that some odorants, as sensed by an artificial nose, seem to degrade while others are potentiated as the test ages. We also discuss the need to establish a map of correspondence between human and machine olfaction when artificial noses are used to characterize or compare human smell performance in research and clinical studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信