医疗保险D部分人群使用心血管药物的不依从性。

Steven A Blackwell, David K Baugh, Melissa A Montgomery, Gary M Ciborowski, Charles J Waldron, Gerald F Riley
{"title":"医疗保险D部分人群使用心血管药物的不依从性。","authors":"Steven A Blackwell,&nbsp;David K Baugh,&nbsp;Melissa A Montgomery,&nbsp;Gary M Ciborowski,&nbsp;Charles J Waldron,&nbsp;Gerald F Riley","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.001.04.a05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) to assess non-compliance among Medicare Part D recipients for the cardiovascular medication classes; (2) to identify the probability of noncompliance for each medication class when controlling for the potential risk factors of age, gender, race/ethnic origin, census region, disease burden, dual eligibility enrollment status, Part D plan status, relative out-of-pocket (OOP) non-class costs, and relative OOP daily class costs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross sectional retrospective review of 2007 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Part D data. All drugs within a drug class were used to conduct the assessment.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Non-compliance was found to be lower than previously reported. Patients who are male, age 65 to 74, Black, or residing in the South are associated with higher noncompliance for cardiovascular medications among the therapeutic classes we studied. Dual eligibility enrollment is typically associated with improved compliance; enrollment in a Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) plan may or may not improve compliance dependent on the therapeutic class under study. Increased disease burden is associated with lower compliance. OOP non-class costs had an opposing effect on compliance as compared to OOP daily costs; higher OOP non-class costs were associated with better compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying patient characteristics that may contribute positively or negatively to medication compliance is an essential step to improved therapy. As a strategy to improve compliance, the proper selection of therapy that fits a particular patient is paramount.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"1 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010442/pdf/mmrr2011-001-04-a05.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noncompliance in the use of cardiovascular medications in the Medicare Part D population.\",\"authors\":\"Steven A Blackwell,&nbsp;David K Baugh,&nbsp;Melissa A Montgomery,&nbsp;Gary M Ciborowski,&nbsp;Charles J Waldron,&nbsp;Gerald F Riley\",\"doi\":\"10.5600/mmrr.001.04.a05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) to assess non-compliance among Medicare Part D recipients for the cardiovascular medication classes; (2) to identify the probability of noncompliance for each medication class when controlling for the potential risk factors of age, gender, race/ethnic origin, census region, disease burden, dual eligibility enrollment status, Part D plan status, relative out-of-pocket (OOP) non-class costs, and relative OOP daily class costs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross sectional retrospective review of 2007 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Part D data. All drugs within a drug class were used to conduct the assessment.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Non-compliance was found to be lower than previously reported. Patients who are male, age 65 to 74, Black, or residing in the South are associated with higher noncompliance for cardiovascular medications among the therapeutic classes we studied. Dual eligibility enrollment is typically associated with improved compliance; enrollment in a Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) plan may or may not improve compliance dependent on the therapeutic class under study. Increased disease burden is associated with lower compliance. OOP non-class costs had an opposing effect on compliance as compared to OOP daily costs; higher OOP non-class costs were associated with better compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying patient characteristics that may contribute positively or negatively to medication compliance is an essential step to improved therapy. As a strategy to improve compliance, the proper selection of therapy that fits a particular patient is paramount.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010442/pdf/mmrr2011-001-04-a05.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.001.04.a05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.001.04.a05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的:(1)评估医疗保险D部分受益人对心血管药物类别的不依从性;(2)在控制年龄、性别、种族/民族、人口普查地区、疾病负担、双重资格登记状态、D部分计划状态、相对自费(OOP)非类别费用、相对OOP每日类别费用等潜在危险因素的情况下,确定各药物类别的不合规概率。设计:对2007年医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS) D部分数据进行横断面回顾性评价。采用同一药物类别内的所有药物进行评估。结果:不遵医嘱的发生率低于先前报道。在我们研究的治疗类别中,男性、65 - 74岁、黑人或居住在南方的患者对心血管药物的不依从性较高。双重资格登记通常与改善依从性有关;参加医疗保险优势处方药(MAPD)计划可能会或可能不会提高依从性,这取决于所研究的治疗类别。疾病负担增加与依从性降低有关。与面向对象的日常成本相比,面向对象的非类别成本对合规的影响相反;更高的OOP非类成本与更好的遵从性相关。结论:识别可能对药物依从性有积极或消极影响的患者特征是改善治疗的必要步骤。作为提高依从性的策略,适当选择适合特定患者的治疗是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noncompliance in the use of cardiovascular medications in the Medicare Part D population.

Objectives: (1) to assess non-compliance among Medicare Part D recipients for the cardiovascular medication classes; (2) to identify the probability of noncompliance for each medication class when controlling for the potential risk factors of age, gender, race/ethnic origin, census region, disease burden, dual eligibility enrollment status, Part D plan status, relative out-of-pocket (OOP) non-class costs, and relative OOP daily class costs.

Design: Cross sectional retrospective review of 2007 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Part D data. All drugs within a drug class were used to conduct the assessment.

Findings: Non-compliance was found to be lower than previously reported. Patients who are male, age 65 to 74, Black, or residing in the South are associated with higher noncompliance for cardiovascular medications among the therapeutic classes we studied. Dual eligibility enrollment is typically associated with improved compliance; enrollment in a Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) plan may or may not improve compliance dependent on the therapeutic class under study. Increased disease burden is associated with lower compliance. OOP non-class costs had an opposing effect on compliance as compared to OOP daily costs; higher OOP non-class costs were associated with better compliance.

Conclusion: Identifying patient characteristics that may contribute positively or negatively to medication compliance is an essential step to improved therapy. As a strategy to improve compliance, the proper selection of therapy that fits a particular patient is paramount.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信