老年激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的内分泌治疗纳入医疗保险D部分。

Gerald F Riley, Joan L Warren, Linda C Harlan, Steven A Blackwell
{"title":"老年激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的内分泌治疗纳入医疗保险D部分。","authors":"Gerald F Riley,&nbsp;Joan L Warren,&nbsp;Linda C Harlan,&nbsp;Steven A Blackwell","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.001.04.a04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical guidelines recommend that women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer receive endocrine therapy (selective estrogen receptor modulators [SERMs] or aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for five years following diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine utilization and adherence to therapy for SERMs and AIs in Medicare Part D prescription drug plans.</p><p><strong>Data: </strong>Linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We identified 15,542 elderly women diagnosed with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer in years 2003-2005 (the latest SEER data at the time of the study) and enrolled in a Part D plan in 2006 or 2007 (the initial years of Part D). This permitted us to compare utilization and adherence to therapy at various points within the recommended five-year timeframe for endocrine therapy. SERM and AI use was measured from claim records. Non-adherence to therapy was defined as a medication possession ratio of less than 80 percent.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Between May 2006 and December 2007, 22 percent of beneficiaries received SERM, 52 percent AI, and 26 percent received neither. The percent receiving any endocrine therapy decreased with time from diagnosis. Among SERM and AI users, 20-30 percent were non-adherent to therapy; out-of-pocket costs were higher for AI than SERM and were strongly associated with non-adherence. For AI users without a low income subsidy, adherence to therapy deteriorated after reaching the Part D coverage gap.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many elderly breast cancer patients were not receiving therapy for the recommended five years following diagnosis. Choosing a Part D plan that minimizes out-of-pocket costs is critical to ensuring beneficiary access to essential medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"1 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010443/pdf/mmrr2011-001-04-a04.pdf","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endocrine therapy use among elderly hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients enrolled in Medicare Part D.\",\"authors\":\"Gerald F Riley,&nbsp;Joan L Warren,&nbsp;Linda C Harlan,&nbsp;Steven A Blackwell\",\"doi\":\"10.5600/mmrr.001.04.a04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical guidelines recommend that women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer receive endocrine therapy (selective estrogen receptor modulators [SERMs] or aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for five years following diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine utilization and adherence to therapy for SERMs and AIs in Medicare Part D prescription drug plans.</p><p><strong>Data: </strong>Linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We identified 15,542 elderly women diagnosed with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer in years 2003-2005 (the latest SEER data at the time of the study) and enrolled in a Part D plan in 2006 or 2007 (the initial years of Part D). This permitted us to compare utilization and adherence to therapy at various points within the recommended five-year timeframe for endocrine therapy. SERM and AI use was measured from claim records. Non-adherence to therapy was defined as a medication possession ratio of less than 80 percent.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Between May 2006 and December 2007, 22 percent of beneficiaries received SERM, 52 percent AI, and 26 percent received neither. The percent receiving any endocrine therapy decreased with time from diagnosis. Among SERM and AI users, 20-30 percent were non-adherent to therapy; out-of-pocket costs were higher for AI than SERM and were strongly associated with non-adherence. For AI users without a low income subsidy, adherence to therapy deteriorated after reaching the Part D coverage gap.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many elderly breast cancer patients were not receiving therapy for the recommended five years following diagnosis. Choosing a Part D plan that minimizes out-of-pocket costs is critical to ensuring beneficiary access to essential medications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010443/pdf/mmrr2011-001-04-a04.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.001.04.a04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.001.04.a04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

背景:临床指南推荐激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者在诊断后5年内接受内分泌治疗(选择性雌激素受体调节剂[SERMs]或芳香化酶抑制剂[AIs])。目的:调查医疗保险D部分处方药计划中SERMs和AIs的使用和依从性。数据:关联监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险数据。研究设计:我们确定了2003-2005年(研究时最新的SEER数据)诊断为激素受体阳性乳腺癌的15,542名老年妇女,并于2006年或2007年(D部分的最初几年)参加了D部分计划。这使我们能够比较在推荐的5年内分泌治疗时间框架内不同时间点的使用和坚持治疗。根据索赔记录测量SERM和AI的使用情况。不坚持治疗被定义为药物持有率低于80%。主要发现:在2006年5月至2007年12月期间,22%的受益人接受了SERM, 52%接受了AI, 26%的人什么都没有接受。接受任何内分泌治疗的百分比随着诊断时间的推移而下降。在SERM和AI使用者中,20- 30%的人对治疗没有依从性;AI的自付费用高于SERM,并且与不依从性密切相关。对于没有低收入补贴的人工智能用户,在达到D部分覆盖缺口后,治疗依从性恶化。结论:许多老年乳腺癌患者在诊断后的5年内没有接受推荐的治疗。选择D部分计划,最大限度地减少自付费用,对于确保受益人获得基本药物至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endocrine therapy use among elderly hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients enrolled in Medicare Part D.

Background: Clinical guidelines recommend that women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer receive endocrine therapy (selective estrogen receptor modulators [SERMs] or aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for five years following diagnosis.

Objective: To examine utilization and adherence to therapy for SERMs and AIs in Medicare Part D prescription drug plans.

Data: Linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data.

Study design: We identified 15,542 elderly women diagnosed with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer in years 2003-2005 (the latest SEER data at the time of the study) and enrolled in a Part D plan in 2006 or 2007 (the initial years of Part D). This permitted us to compare utilization and adherence to therapy at various points within the recommended five-year timeframe for endocrine therapy. SERM and AI use was measured from claim records. Non-adherence to therapy was defined as a medication possession ratio of less than 80 percent.

Principal findings: Between May 2006 and December 2007, 22 percent of beneficiaries received SERM, 52 percent AI, and 26 percent received neither. The percent receiving any endocrine therapy decreased with time from diagnosis. Among SERM and AI users, 20-30 percent were non-adherent to therapy; out-of-pocket costs were higher for AI than SERM and were strongly associated with non-adherence. For AI users without a low income subsidy, adherence to therapy deteriorated after reaching the Part D coverage gap.

Conclusions: Many elderly breast cancer patients were not receiving therapy for the recommended five years following diagnosis. Choosing a Part D plan that minimizes out-of-pocket costs is critical to ensuring beneficiary access to essential medications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信