向ICD-10过渡对医疗保险住院病人支付的影响。

Ronald E Mills, Rhonda R Butler, Elizabeth C McCullough, Mona Z Bao, Richard F Averill
{"title":"向ICD-10过渡对医疗保险住院病人支付的影响。","authors":"Ronald E Mills,&nbsp;Rhonda R Butler,&nbsp;Elizabeth C McCullough,&nbsp;Mona Z Bao,&nbsp;Richard F Averill","doi":"10.5600/mmrr.001.02.a02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>On October 1, 2013, the reporting of diagnoses and procedures in the U.S. will transition from the clinical modification of the ninth revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) to the tenth revision (ICD-10). We estimate the impact of conversion to ICD-10 on Medicare MS-DRG payments to hospitals using 2009 Medicare data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the ICD-9-CM MS-DRG v27 (FY 2010), the converted ICD-10 MS-DRG v27, and the ICD-10 to ICD-9-CM Reimbursement Map for fiscal year 2010, we estimate the impact on aggregate payments to hospitals and the distribution of payments across hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the transition from the ICD-9-CM to the ICD-10 version of MS-DRGs resulted in 1.68 percent of the patients being assigned to a different MS-DRG, payment increases and decreases due to the changes in MS-DRG assignment essentially netted out, resulting in a minimal impact on aggregate payments to hospitals (+0.05 percent) and on the distribution of payments across hospital types (-0.01 to +0.18 percent). Mapping ICD-10 data back to ICD-9-CM, and using the ICD-9-CM MS-DRGs, resulted in 3.66 percent of patients being assigned to a different MS-DRG, a modest decrease in aggregate payments to hospitals (-0.34 percent), and modest changes in the distribution of payments across hospital types (-0.14 to -0.46 percent).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>As demonstrated by MS-DRGs, a direct conversion of an application to ICD-10 can produce consistent results with the ICD-9-CM version of the application. However, the use of mappings between ICD-10 and ICD-9-CM will produce less consistent results, especially if the mapping is not tailored to the specific application.</p>","PeriodicalId":89601,"journal":{"name":"Medicare & medicaid research review","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010447/pdf/mmrr2011-001-02-a02.pdf","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the transition to ICD-10 on Medicare inpatient hospital payments.\",\"authors\":\"Ronald E Mills,&nbsp;Rhonda R Butler,&nbsp;Elizabeth C McCullough,&nbsp;Mona Z Bao,&nbsp;Richard F Averill\",\"doi\":\"10.5600/mmrr.001.02.a02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>On October 1, 2013, the reporting of diagnoses and procedures in the U.S. will transition from the clinical modification of the ninth revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) to the tenth revision (ICD-10). We estimate the impact of conversion to ICD-10 on Medicare MS-DRG payments to hospitals using 2009 Medicare data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the ICD-9-CM MS-DRG v27 (FY 2010), the converted ICD-10 MS-DRG v27, and the ICD-10 to ICD-9-CM Reimbursement Map for fiscal year 2010, we estimate the impact on aggregate payments to hospitals and the distribution of payments across hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the transition from the ICD-9-CM to the ICD-10 version of MS-DRGs resulted in 1.68 percent of the patients being assigned to a different MS-DRG, payment increases and decreases due to the changes in MS-DRG assignment essentially netted out, resulting in a minimal impact on aggregate payments to hospitals (+0.05 percent) and on the distribution of payments across hospital types (-0.01 to +0.18 percent). Mapping ICD-10 data back to ICD-9-CM, and using the ICD-9-CM MS-DRGs, resulted in 3.66 percent of patients being assigned to a different MS-DRG, a modest decrease in aggregate payments to hospitals (-0.34 percent), and modest changes in the distribution of payments across hospital types (-0.14 to -0.46 percent).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>As demonstrated by MS-DRGs, a direct conversion of an application to ICD-10 can produce consistent results with the ICD-9-CM version of the application. However, the use of mappings between ICD-10 and ICD-9-CM will produce less consistent results, especially if the mapping is not tailored to the specific application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010447/pdf/mmrr2011-001-02-a02.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicare & medicaid research review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.001.02.a02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicare & medicaid research review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.001.02.a02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

目的:2013年10月1日,美国的诊断和手术报告将从国际疾病分类(ICD-9-CM)第九版的临床修改过渡到第十版(ICD-10)。我们使用2009年的医疗保险数据估计转换到ICD-10对医疗保险MS-DRG支付给医院的影响。方法:使用ICD-9-CM MS-DRG v27(2010财年)、转换后的ICD-10 MS-DRG v27以及2010财年ICD-10到ICD-9-CM报销图,我们估计了对医院总支付和医院间支付分配的影响。结果:虽然从ICD-9-CM到ICD-10版本的MS-DRGs的过渡导致1.68%的患者被分配到不同的MS-DRG,但由于MS-DRG分配的变化,支付的增加和减少基本上是净抵消的,导致对医院总支付的影响最小(+ 0.05%),对医院类型之间的支付分配的影响最小(-0.01至+ 0.18%)。将ICD-10数据映射回ICD-9-CM,并使用ICD-9-CM MS-DRGs,结果是3.66%的患者被分配到不同的MS-DRG,向医院支付的总费用适度减少(- 0.34%),支付在医院类型之间的分布略有变化(- 0.14%至- 0.46%)。讨论:正如MS-DRGs所证明的那样,将应用程序直接转换为ICD-10可以产生与ICD-9-CM版本一致的结果。然而,使用ICD-10和ICD-9-CM之间的映射会产生不太一致的结果,特别是如果映射不是针对特定应用而定制的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of the transition to ICD-10 on Medicare inpatient hospital payments.

Objective: On October 1, 2013, the reporting of diagnoses and procedures in the U.S. will transition from the clinical modification of the ninth revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) to the tenth revision (ICD-10). We estimate the impact of conversion to ICD-10 on Medicare MS-DRG payments to hospitals using 2009 Medicare data.

Methods: Using the ICD-9-CM MS-DRG v27 (FY 2010), the converted ICD-10 MS-DRG v27, and the ICD-10 to ICD-9-CM Reimbursement Map for fiscal year 2010, we estimate the impact on aggregate payments to hospitals and the distribution of payments across hospitals.

Results: Although the transition from the ICD-9-CM to the ICD-10 version of MS-DRGs resulted in 1.68 percent of the patients being assigned to a different MS-DRG, payment increases and decreases due to the changes in MS-DRG assignment essentially netted out, resulting in a minimal impact on aggregate payments to hospitals (+0.05 percent) and on the distribution of payments across hospital types (-0.01 to +0.18 percent). Mapping ICD-10 data back to ICD-9-CM, and using the ICD-9-CM MS-DRGs, resulted in 3.66 percent of patients being assigned to a different MS-DRG, a modest decrease in aggregate payments to hospitals (-0.34 percent), and modest changes in the distribution of payments across hospital types (-0.14 to -0.46 percent).

Discussion: As demonstrated by MS-DRGs, a direct conversion of an application to ICD-10 can produce consistent results with the ICD-9-CM version of the application. However, the use of mappings between ICD-10 and ICD-9-CM will produce less consistent results, especially if the mapping is not tailored to the specific application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信