阿司匹林的矛盾效应

Thrombosis Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-01-15 DOI:10.1155/2012/676237
Christian Doutremepuich, Omar Aguejouf, Vanessa Desplat, Francisco X Eizayaga
{"title":"阿司匹林的矛盾效应","authors":"Christian Doutremepuich, Omar Aguejouf, Vanessa Desplat, Francisco X Eizayaga","doi":"10.1155/2012/676237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low-dose aspirin is an important therapeutic option in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke, basedon its unique cost-effectiveness and widespread availability. In addition, based on the results of a number of large studies, aspirin is also widely used in the primary prevention of MI. This paper provides an update of the available data to offer greater clarity regarding the risks of aspirin with respect to hemorrhagic stroke. In the secondary prevention of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and ischemic events, the evidence supports that the benefits of aspirin treatment significantly outweigh the risk of a major hemorrhage. When considering whether aspirin is appropriate, the absolute therapeutic cardiovascular benefits of aspirin must be balanced with the possible risks associated with its use, being hemorrhagic stroke. Regarding these clinical facts, normal, COX 1 -/-, and COX 2 -/- mice were treated with a wide range of doses of aspirin and studied by induced hemorrhagic time. The results outlined three major conclusions: high doses of aspirin induce hemorrhage, while low doses of aspirin do not. In the absence of COX 1, ultra low doses of aspirin produce an antihemorrhagic effect not observed with intermediate doses. The absence of COX 2 induced a hemorrhagic effect that needs further research, probably originated in compensatory phenomena.</p>","PeriodicalId":75222,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis","volume":"2012 ","pages":"676237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3265119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paradoxical effect of aspirin.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Doutremepuich, Omar Aguejouf, Vanessa Desplat, Francisco X Eizayaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2012/676237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Low-dose aspirin is an important therapeutic option in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke, basedon its unique cost-effectiveness and widespread availability. In addition, based on the results of a number of large studies, aspirin is also widely used in the primary prevention of MI. This paper provides an update of the available data to offer greater clarity regarding the risks of aspirin with respect to hemorrhagic stroke. In the secondary prevention of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and ischemic events, the evidence supports that the benefits of aspirin treatment significantly outweigh the risk of a major hemorrhage. When considering whether aspirin is appropriate, the absolute therapeutic cardiovascular benefits of aspirin must be balanced with the possible risks associated with its use, being hemorrhagic stroke. Regarding these clinical facts, normal, COX 1 -/-, and COX 2 -/- mice were treated with a wide range of doses of aspirin and studied by induced hemorrhagic time. The results outlined three major conclusions: high doses of aspirin induce hemorrhage, while low doses of aspirin do not. In the absence of COX 1, ultra low doses of aspirin produce an antihemorrhagic effect not observed with intermediate doses. The absence of COX 2 induced a hemorrhagic effect that needs further research, probably originated in compensatory phenomena.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis\",\"volume\":\"2012 \",\"pages\":\"676237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3265119/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/676237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/676237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小剂量阿司匹林因其独特的成本效益和广泛的可获得性,成为心肌梗死(MI)和缺血性中风二级预防的重要治疗选择。此外,根据一些大型研究的结果,阿司匹林也被广泛用于心肌梗死的一级预防。本文对现有数据进行了更新,以进一步明确阿司匹林对出血性中风的风险。在心血管、脑血管和缺血性事件的二级预防中,有证据支持阿司匹林治疗的益处大大超过大出血的风险。在考虑是否适合服用阿司匹林时,必须权衡阿司匹林对心血管治疗的绝对益处与使用阿司匹林可能带来的风险(即出血性中风)。针对这些临床事实,对正常小鼠、COX 1 -/-小鼠和 COX 2 -/-小鼠使用多种剂量的阿司匹林进行治疗,并通过诱导出血时间进行研究。结果得出三大结论:高剂量阿司匹林会诱发出血,而低剂量阿司匹林不会。在缺乏 COX 1 的情况下,超低剂量的阿司匹林会产生止血效果,而中等剂量的阿司匹林则不会。COX 2 的缺失会诱发出血效应,这需要进一步研究,可能源于代偿现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Paradoxical effect of aspirin.

Paradoxical effect of aspirin.

Paradoxical effect of aspirin.

Paradoxical effect of aspirin.

Low-dose aspirin is an important therapeutic option in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke, basedon its unique cost-effectiveness and widespread availability. In addition, based on the results of a number of large studies, aspirin is also widely used in the primary prevention of MI. This paper provides an update of the available data to offer greater clarity regarding the risks of aspirin with respect to hemorrhagic stroke. In the secondary prevention of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and ischemic events, the evidence supports that the benefits of aspirin treatment significantly outweigh the risk of a major hemorrhage. When considering whether aspirin is appropriate, the absolute therapeutic cardiovascular benefits of aspirin must be balanced with the possible risks associated with its use, being hemorrhagic stroke. Regarding these clinical facts, normal, COX 1 -/-, and COX 2 -/- mice were treated with a wide range of doses of aspirin and studied by induced hemorrhagic time. The results outlined three major conclusions: high doses of aspirin induce hemorrhage, while low doses of aspirin do not. In the absence of COX 1, ultra low doses of aspirin produce an antihemorrhagic effect not observed with intermediate doses. The absence of COX 2 induced a hemorrhagic effect that needs further research, probably originated in compensatory phenomena.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信