生物嗅觉中浓度不变性的顺序机制。

Frontiers in neuroengineering Pub Date : 2012-01-05 eCollection Date: 2011-11-16 DOI:10.3389/fneng.2011.00021
Thomas A Cleland, Szu-Yu T Chen, Katarzyna W Hozer, Hope N Ukatu, Kevin J Wong, Fangfei Zheng
{"title":"生物嗅觉中浓度不变性的顺序机制。","authors":"Thomas A Cleland,&nbsp;Szu-Yu T Chen,&nbsp;Katarzyna W Hozer,&nbsp;Hope N Ukatu,&nbsp;Kevin J Wong,&nbsp;Fangfei Zheng","doi":"10.3389/fneng.2011.00021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concentration invariance-the capacity to recognize a given odorant (analyte) across a range of concentrations-is an unusually difficult problem in the olfactory modality. Nevertheless, humans and other animals are able to recognize known odors across substantial concentration ranges, and this concentration invariance is a highly desirable property for artificial systems as well. Several properties of olfactory systems have been proposed to contribute to concentration invariance, but none of these alone can plausibly achieve full concentration invariance. We here propose that the mammalian olfactory system uses at least six computational mechanisms in series to reduce the concentration-dependent variance in odor representations to a level at which different concentrations of odors evoke reasonably similar representations, while preserving variance arising from differences in odor quality. We suggest that the residual variance then is treated like any other source of stimulus variance, and categorized appropriately into \"odors\" via perceptual learning. We further show that naïve mice respond to different concentrations of an odorant just as if they were differences in quality, suggesting that, prior to odor categorization, the learning-independent compensatory mechanisms are limited in their capacity to achieve concentration invariance.</p>","PeriodicalId":73093,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neuroengineering","volume":" ","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3389/fneng.2011.00021","citationCount":"77","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequential mechanisms underlying concentration invariance in biological olfaction.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas A Cleland,&nbsp;Szu-Yu T Chen,&nbsp;Katarzyna W Hozer,&nbsp;Hope N Ukatu,&nbsp;Kevin J Wong,&nbsp;Fangfei Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fneng.2011.00021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Concentration invariance-the capacity to recognize a given odorant (analyte) across a range of concentrations-is an unusually difficult problem in the olfactory modality. Nevertheless, humans and other animals are able to recognize known odors across substantial concentration ranges, and this concentration invariance is a highly desirable property for artificial systems as well. Several properties of olfactory systems have been proposed to contribute to concentration invariance, but none of these alone can plausibly achieve full concentration invariance. We here propose that the mammalian olfactory system uses at least six computational mechanisms in series to reduce the concentration-dependent variance in odor representations to a level at which different concentrations of odors evoke reasonably similar representations, while preserving variance arising from differences in odor quality. We suggest that the residual variance then is treated like any other source of stimulus variance, and categorized appropriately into \\\"odors\\\" via perceptual learning. We further show that naïve mice respond to different concentrations of an odorant just as if they were differences in quality, suggesting that, prior to odor categorization, the learning-independent compensatory mechanisms are limited in their capacity to achieve concentration invariance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in neuroengineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3389/fneng.2011.00021\",\"citationCount\":\"77\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in neuroengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2011.00021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/11/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neuroengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2011.00021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77

摘要

浓度不变性——在一系列浓度范围内识别给定气味(分析物)的能力——是嗅觉模式中一个异常困难的问题。然而,人类和其他动物能够在相当大的浓度范围内识别已知的气味,并且这种浓度不变性对于人工系统也是非常理想的特性。人们提出嗅觉系统的几个特性有助于浓度不变性,但这些特性都不能单独实现完全的浓度不变性。我们在此提出,哺乳动物嗅觉系统使用至少六种连续的计算机制来减少气味表征的浓度依赖性方差,使不同浓度的气味唤起合理相似的表征,同时保留由气味质量差异引起的方差。我们建议将剩余方差与任何其他刺激方差源一样处理,并通过感知学习将其适当地分类为“气味”。我们进一步表明naïve小鼠对不同浓度的气味做出反应,就像它们在质量上的差异一样,这表明,在气味分类之前,学习无关的补偿机制在实现浓度不变的能力方面受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sequential mechanisms underlying concentration invariance in biological olfaction.

Sequential mechanisms underlying concentration invariance in biological olfaction.

Sequential mechanisms underlying concentration invariance in biological olfaction.

Sequential mechanisms underlying concentration invariance in biological olfaction.

Concentration invariance-the capacity to recognize a given odorant (analyte) across a range of concentrations-is an unusually difficult problem in the olfactory modality. Nevertheless, humans and other animals are able to recognize known odors across substantial concentration ranges, and this concentration invariance is a highly desirable property for artificial systems as well. Several properties of olfactory systems have been proposed to contribute to concentration invariance, but none of these alone can plausibly achieve full concentration invariance. We here propose that the mammalian olfactory system uses at least six computational mechanisms in series to reduce the concentration-dependent variance in odor representations to a level at which different concentrations of odors evoke reasonably similar representations, while preserving variance arising from differences in odor quality. We suggest that the residual variance then is treated like any other source of stimulus variance, and categorized appropriately into "odors" via perceptual learning. We further show that naïve mice respond to different concentrations of an odorant just as if they were differences in quality, suggesting that, prior to odor categorization, the learning-independent compensatory mechanisms are limited in their capacity to achieve concentration invariance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信