Isidro Machado, Amparo Ruiz-Sauri, José A López-Guerrero, Antonio Llombart-Bosch
{"title":"Ewing肉瘤/原始神经外胚层肿瘤DNA倍体和核细胞周期调控因子的形态计量学分析。","authors":"Isidro Machado, Amparo Ruiz-Sauri, José A López-Guerrero, Antonio Llombart-Bosch","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the morphometry of DNA ploidy as a prognostic factor, compare qualitative and quantitative methods using immunohistochemical markers, and evaluate the utility of morphometry in the differential diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma family of tumor (ESFT) subtypes and small round cell tumors (SRCTs) of bone.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A total of 111 genetically confirmed ESFTs and 19 SRCTs were evaluated for DNA content and immunohistochemistry for p53, p16, and Ki-67 using morphometric analysis. Qualitative evaluation was performed using light microscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the ESFT cases, 81% were aneuploid. Overall, no statistical differences were observed regarding the nuclear area or roundness between ESFT and SRCT and between ESFT subtypes. p53 and p16 revealed high concordance between qualitative and quantitative methods and a lower agreement using Ki-67. Nuclear roundness showed prognostic significance in the univariate analysis for proportional risk survival but no independent prognostically significant variable was obtained after multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DNA content, nuclear area, or roundness cannot distinguish between ESFT and other SRCT. Morphometric analysis cannot discriminate between ESFT histologic subtypes. Quantitative measurements of IHC parameters are more precise than conventional measurements, particularly in discrepant cases (--vs. +, ++ vs. +++). DNA ploidy is not a prognostic factor in ESFT.</p>","PeriodicalId":76995,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology","volume":"33 2","pages":"101-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morphometric analysis of DNA ploidy and nuclear cell cycle regulators in Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor.\",\"authors\":\"Isidro Machado, Amparo Ruiz-Sauri, José A López-Guerrero, Antonio Llombart-Bosch\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the morphometry of DNA ploidy as a prognostic factor, compare qualitative and quantitative methods using immunohistochemical markers, and evaluate the utility of morphometry in the differential diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma family of tumor (ESFT) subtypes and small round cell tumors (SRCTs) of bone.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A total of 111 genetically confirmed ESFTs and 19 SRCTs were evaluated for DNA content and immunohistochemistry for p53, p16, and Ki-67 using morphometric analysis. Qualitative evaluation was performed using light microscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the ESFT cases, 81% were aneuploid. Overall, no statistical differences were observed regarding the nuclear area or roundness between ESFT and SRCT and between ESFT subtypes. p53 and p16 revealed high concordance between qualitative and quantitative methods and a lower agreement using Ki-67. Nuclear roundness showed prognostic significance in the univariate analysis for proportional risk survival but no independent prognostically significant variable was obtained after multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DNA content, nuclear area, or roundness cannot distinguish between ESFT and other SRCT. Morphometric analysis cannot discriminate between ESFT histologic subtypes. Quantitative measurements of IHC parameters are more precise than conventional measurements, particularly in discrepant cases (--vs. +, ++ vs. +++). DNA ploidy is not a prognostic factor in ESFT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"101-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究DNA倍体形态学作为预后因素,比较免疫组织化学标志物定性和定量方法,评价形态学在骨尤文氏肉瘤家族肿瘤(ESFT)亚型和骨小圆细胞肿瘤(srct)鉴别诊断中的应用价值。研究设计:使用形态计量学分析,对111例基因证实的ESFTs和19例srct进行DNA含量和p53、p16和Ki-67的免疫组化评估。光镜下进行定性评价。结果:ESFT病例中81%为非整倍体。总的来说,ESFT和SRCT以及ESFT亚型之间在核面积或圆度方面没有统计学差异。p53和p16在定性和定量方法上的一致性较高,而Ki-67方法的一致性较低。核圆度在比例风险生存的单因素分析中显示预后意义,但在多因素分析后未获得具有独立预后意义的变量。结论:DNA含量、核面积、圆度不能区分ESFT与其他SRCT。形态计量学分析不能区分ESFT的组织学亚型。IHC参数的定量测量比常规测量更精确,特别是在差异病例中(- vs。+, ++ vs +++)。DNA倍性不是ESFT的预后因素。
Morphometric analysis of DNA ploidy and nuclear cell cycle regulators in Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor.
Objective: To study the morphometry of DNA ploidy as a prognostic factor, compare qualitative and quantitative methods using immunohistochemical markers, and evaluate the utility of morphometry in the differential diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma family of tumor (ESFT) subtypes and small round cell tumors (SRCTs) of bone.
Study design: A total of 111 genetically confirmed ESFTs and 19 SRCTs were evaluated for DNA content and immunohistochemistry for p53, p16, and Ki-67 using morphometric analysis. Qualitative evaluation was performed using light microscopy.
Results: Of the ESFT cases, 81% were aneuploid. Overall, no statistical differences were observed regarding the nuclear area or roundness between ESFT and SRCT and between ESFT subtypes. p53 and p16 revealed high concordance between qualitative and quantitative methods and a lower agreement using Ki-67. Nuclear roundness showed prognostic significance in the univariate analysis for proportional risk survival but no independent prognostically significant variable was obtained after multivariate analysis.
Conclusion: DNA content, nuclear area, or roundness cannot distinguish between ESFT and other SRCT. Morphometric analysis cannot discriminate between ESFT histologic subtypes. Quantitative measurements of IHC parameters are more precise than conventional measurements, particularly in discrepant cases (--vs. +, ++ vs. +++). DNA ploidy is not a prognostic factor in ESFT.