元分析的研究方法

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Nathan Leon Pace M.D., M.Stat
{"title":"元分析的研究方法","authors":"Nathan Leon Pace M.D., M.Stat","doi":"10.1016/j.bpa.2011.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Meta-analysis uses numerical tools to pool data and to estimate a summary effect size for the comparison of two interventions from a set of randomised controlled trials identified in a </span>systematic review. An effect size is a single number that expresses the difference in outcome from the interventions. The most commonly used effect sizes for dichotomous outcomes, for example, mortality, are the odds ratio and the relative risk. The results of a meta-analysis are usually presented in a complex figure, known as a forest plot, which shows both the individual studies and the summary statistics. Sensitivity analyses are performed to clarify the effect of the experimental design bias on the effect size. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity of the included studies are explored by the additional tools of fixed effect versus random effects models and subgroup analyses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48541,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology","volume":"25 4","pages":"Pages 523-533"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bpa.2011.08.005","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research methods for meta-analyses\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Leon Pace M.D., M.Stat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpa.2011.08.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Meta-analysis uses numerical tools to pool data and to estimate a summary effect size for the comparison of two interventions from a set of randomised controlled trials identified in a </span>systematic review. An effect size is a single number that expresses the difference in outcome from the interventions. The most commonly used effect sizes for dichotomous outcomes, for example, mortality, are the odds ratio and the relative risk. The results of a meta-analysis are usually presented in a complex figure, known as a forest plot, which shows both the individual studies and the summary statistics. Sensitivity analyses are performed to clarify the effect of the experimental design bias on the effect size. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity of the included studies are explored by the additional tools of fixed effect versus random effects models and subgroup analyses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 523-533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bpa.2011.08.005\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521689611000644\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521689611000644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

荟萃分析使用数值工具汇集数据,并估计从系统评价中确定的一组随机对照试验中比较两种干预措施的总效应大小。效应量是表示干预结果差异的单个数字。对于二分类结果,例如死亡率,最常用的效应量是比值比和相对风险。荟萃分析的结果通常以复杂的图形呈现,称为森林图,它既显示了个体研究,也显示了汇总统计数据。进行敏感性分析以澄清实验设计偏差对效应大小的影响。通过固定效应与随机效应模型和亚组分析的附加工具来探讨纳入研究的临床和统计异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research methods for meta-analyses

Meta-analysis uses numerical tools to pool data and to estimate a summary effect size for the comparison of two interventions from a set of randomised controlled trials identified in a systematic review. An effect size is a single number that expresses the difference in outcome from the interventions. The most commonly used effect sizes for dichotomous outcomes, for example, mortality, are the odds ratio and the relative risk. The results of a meta-analysis are usually presented in a complex figure, known as a forest plot, which shows both the individual studies and the summary statistics. Sensitivity analyses are performed to clarify the effect of the experimental design bias on the effect size. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity of the included studies are explored by the additional tools of fixed effect versus random effects models and subgroup analyses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信