{"title":"快速商业测试Enterocheck WB(®)与自动血液培养用于伤寒诊断的比较","authors":"R Anusha, R Ganesh, J Lalitha","doi":"10.1179/1465328111Y.0000000030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid diagnosis of typhoid fever is very important in the timely initiation of therapy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Enterocheck WB(®) test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective study, the sensitivity and specificity of Enterocheck WB(®) that detects IgM antibodies to Salmonella typhi were compared with blood culture using BacT/Alert.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and fifty patients with suspected typhoid fever were assessed both by blood culture and Enterocheck WB(®); 100 of them were either Enterocheck WB(®)-positive or blood culture-positive or both for S. typhi. Both tests were positive in 47 of the 100 patients. In 45 patients, Enterocheck WB(®) was positive but blood culture was negative. In eight cases, Enterocheck was negative but blood culture was positive. Using blood culture as the gold standard, the sensitivity of Enterocheck WB(®) was 85.5%, specificity 88.6%, negative predictive value 97.7% and positive predictive value 51.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Enterocheck WB(®) test can be performed at the bedside in 15 minutes and is a useful rapid method for diagnosis of typhoid fever.</p>","PeriodicalId":50759,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Tropical Paediatrics","volume":"31 3","pages":"231-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/1465328111Y.0000000030","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of a rapid commercial test, Enterocheck WB(®), with automated blood culture for diagnosis of typhoid fever.\",\"authors\":\"R Anusha, R Ganesh, J Lalitha\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/1465328111Y.0000000030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid diagnosis of typhoid fever is very important in the timely initiation of therapy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Enterocheck WB(®) test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective study, the sensitivity and specificity of Enterocheck WB(®) that detects IgM antibodies to Salmonella typhi were compared with blood culture using BacT/Alert.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and fifty patients with suspected typhoid fever were assessed both by blood culture and Enterocheck WB(®); 100 of them were either Enterocheck WB(®)-positive or blood culture-positive or both for S. typhi. Both tests were positive in 47 of the 100 patients. In 45 patients, Enterocheck WB(®) was positive but blood culture was negative. In eight cases, Enterocheck was negative but blood culture was positive. Using blood culture as the gold standard, the sensitivity of Enterocheck WB(®) was 85.5%, specificity 88.6%, negative predictive value 97.7% and positive predictive value 51.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Enterocheck WB(®) test can be performed at the bedside in 15 minutes and is a useful rapid method for diagnosis of typhoid fever.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Tropical Paediatrics\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"231-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/1465328111Y.0000000030\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Tropical Paediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/1465328111Y.0000000030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Tropical Paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/1465328111Y.0000000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of a rapid commercial test, Enterocheck WB(®), with automated blood culture for diagnosis of typhoid fever.
Background: Rapid diagnosis of typhoid fever is very important in the timely initiation of therapy.
Objectives: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Enterocheck WB(®) test.
Methods: In a prospective study, the sensitivity and specificity of Enterocheck WB(®) that detects IgM antibodies to Salmonella typhi were compared with blood culture using BacT/Alert.
Results: Four hundred and fifty patients with suspected typhoid fever were assessed both by blood culture and Enterocheck WB(®); 100 of them were either Enterocheck WB(®)-positive or blood culture-positive or both for S. typhi. Both tests were positive in 47 of the 100 patients. In 45 patients, Enterocheck WB(®) was positive but blood culture was negative. In eight cases, Enterocheck was negative but blood culture was positive. Using blood culture as the gold standard, the sensitivity of Enterocheck WB(®) was 85.5%, specificity 88.6%, negative predictive value 97.7% and positive predictive value 51.1%.
Conclusion: The Enterocheck WB(®) test can be performed at the bedside in 15 minutes and is a useful rapid method for diagnosis of typhoid fever.