脓毒症的分子机制。

Contributions to microbiology Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-06-09 DOI:10.1159/000324009
James A Russell, John Boyd, Taka Nakada, Simone Thair, Keith R Walley
{"title":"脓毒症的分子机制。","authors":"James A Russell,&nbsp;John Boyd,&nbsp;Taka Nakada,&nbsp;Simone Thair,&nbsp;Keith R Walley","doi":"10.1159/000324009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In cancer, therapies are targeted at 6 important pathways. In sepsis, there is ongoing controversy regarding the number and relative roles of pathways that are activated or repressed and which are important in the progression from health to death. Adding to complexity, there is interaction of pathways, there are differences in temporal pattern of up and down-regulation of pathways and there are different responses of pathways to therapies of sepsis. In this review, we define four key pathways of sepsis: (1) inflammation and immunity, (2) coagulation and fibrinolysis, (3) apoptosis, and (4) endocrine. Each of these pathways can impair endothelial function, a unifying aspect of the pathophysiology of sepsis. There are few studies of interactions of pathways except for the interacttion of inflammation/immunity with coagulation/fibrinolysis. Successful treatment of cancer requires that cancer therapies interrupt several key pathways of cancer. Accordingly, we suggest that successful treatment of sepsis will require therapies that interrupt several key pathways of sepsis. Perhaps the paucity of approved therapies for sepsis is related in part to the underevaluation of novel pathways, to lack of understanding of interactions of pathways and to lack of interruption of key pathways of sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":79855,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000324009","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular mechanisms of sepsis.\",\"authors\":\"James A Russell,&nbsp;John Boyd,&nbsp;Taka Nakada,&nbsp;Simone Thair,&nbsp;Keith R Walley\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000324009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In cancer, therapies are targeted at 6 important pathways. In sepsis, there is ongoing controversy regarding the number and relative roles of pathways that are activated or repressed and which are important in the progression from health to death. Adding to complexity, there is interaction of pathways, there are differences in temporal pattern of up and down-regulation of pathways and there are different responses of pathways to therapies of sepsis. In this review, we define four key pathways of sepsis: (1) inflammation and immunity, (2) coagulation and fibrinolysis, (3) apoptosis, and (4) endocrine. Each of these pathways can impair endothelial function, a unifying aspect of the pathophysiology of sepsis. There are few studies of interactions of pathways except for the interacttion of inflammation/immunity with coagulation/fibrinolysis. Successful treatment of cancer requires that cancer therapies interrupt several key pathways of cancer. Accordingly, we suggest that successful treatment of sepsis will require therapies that interrupt several key pathways of sepsis. Perhaps the paucity of approved therapies for sepsis is related in part to the underevaluation of novel pathways, to lack of understanding of interactions of pathways and to lack of interruption of key pathways of sepsis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contributions to microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000324009\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contributions to microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000324009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/6/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000324009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

在癌症中,治疗是针对6个重要的途径。在脓毒症中,关于激活或抑制的途径的数量和相对作用,以及在从健康到死亡的进展中重要的途径,一直存在争议。更复杂的是,通路之间存在相互作用,通路上下调节的时间模式存在差异,对脓毒症治疗的通路反应也存在差异。在这篇综述中,我们定义了脓毒症的四个关键途径:(1)炎症和免疫,(2)凝血和纤溶,(3)细胞凋亡,(4)内分泌。这些途径中的每一个都可以损害内皮功能,这是脓毒症病理生理学的一个统一方面。除了炎症/免疫与凝血/纤溶的相互作用外,很少有通路相互作用的研究。癌症的成功治疗需要癌症治疗中断癌症的几个关键途径。因此,我们建议成功治疗脓毒症需要阻断脓毒症的几个关键途径。也许,败血症的批准治疗方法的缺乏部分与对新途径的评估不足,对途径相互作用的理解不足以及缺乏对败血症关键途径的中断有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Molecular mechanisms of sepsis.

In cancer, therapies are targeted at 6 important pathways. In sepsis, there is ongoing controversy regarding the number and relative roles of pathways that are activated or repressed and which are important in the progression from health to death. Adding to complexity, there is interaction of pathways, there are differences in temporal pattern of up and down-regulation of pathways and there are different responses of pathways to therapies of sepsis. In this review, we define four key pathways of sepsis: (1) inflammation and immunity, (2) coagulation and fibrinolysis, (3) apoptosis, and (4) endocrine. Each of these pathways can impair endothelial function, a unifying aspect of the pathophysiology of sepsis. There are few studies of interactions of pathways except for the interacttion of inflammation/immunity with coagulation/fibrinolysis. Successful treatment of cancer requires that cancer therapies interrupt several key pathways of cancer. Accordingly, we suggest that successful treatment of sepsis will require therapies that interrupt several key pathways of sepsis. Perhaps the paucity of approved therapies for sepsis is related in part to the underevaluation of novel pathways, to lack of understanding of interactions of pathways and to lack of interruption of key pathways of sepsis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信