前列腺组织微阵列核心图像分析中的手动和自动系统。

Swaroop S Singh, Michael J Ray, Warren Davis, James R Marshall, Wael A Sakr, James L Mohler
{"title":"前列腺组织微阵列核心图像分析中的手动和自动系统。","authors":"Swaroop S Singh,&nbsp;Michael J Ray,&nbsp;Warren Davis,&nbsp;James R Marshall,&nbsp;Wael A Sakr,&nbsp;James L Mohler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare manual and automated image analysis systems in morphologic analysis of nuclei from benign prostate, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostate cancer (CaP). Morphologic features derived using automated image analysis systems may be more objective and reproducible than manual systems, which require humans to segment nuclei from histologic images.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Images of hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections of prostate tissue microarray were analyzed independently using the automated and manual systems. Mean optical density (MOD), nuclear area (NA), and nuclear roundness factor (NRF) were the morphologic features studied. The ability to differentiate between tissue types using morphologic features derived from an automated and a manual system was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nuclei from 17 benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), 4 HGPIN, and 8 aggressive CaP were analyzed. The manual system distinguished better between BPH and HGPIN (p < 0.0001), whereas the automated system distinguished better between BPH and CaP (p = 0.01) in multivariate models. The manual system distinguished better BPH and HGPIN using NA (p < 0.0001) and MOD (p < 0.0001), whereas the automated system distinguished better BPH and CaP using MOD (p < 0.0001) and NRF (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The minimal human effort required for automated image analysis makes it superior to the manual system.</p>","PeriodicalId":76995,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology","volume":"32 6","pages":"311-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manual and automated systems in the analysis of images from prostate tissue microarray cores.\",\"authors\":\"Swaroop S Singh,&nbsp;Michael J Ray,&nbsp;Warren Davis,&nbsp;James R Marshall,&nbsp;Wael A Sakr,&nbsp;James L Mohler\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare manual and automated image analysis systems in morphologic analysis of nuclei from benign prostate, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostate cancer (CaP). Morphologic features derived using automated image analysis systems may be more objective and reproducible than manual systems, which require humans to segment nuclei from histologic images.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Images of hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections of prostate tissue microarray were analyzed independently using the automated and manual systems. Mean optical density (MOD), nuclear area (NA), and nuclear roundness factor (NRF) were the morphologic features studied. The ability to differentiate between tissue types using morphologic features derived from an automated and a manual system was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nuclei from 17 benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), 4 HGPIN, and 8 aggressive CaP were analyzed. The manual system distinguished better between BPH and HGPIN (p < 0.0001), whereas the automated system distinguished better between BPH and CaP (p = 0.01) in multivariate models. The manual system distinguished better BPH and HGPIN using NA (p < 0.0001) and MOD (p < 0.0001), whereas the automated system distinguished better BPH and CaP using MOD (p < 0.0001) and NRF (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The minimal human effort required for automated image analysis makes it superior to the manual system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology\",\"volume\":\"32 6\",\"pages\":\"311-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较人工和自动图像分析系统在良性前列腺、高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变(HGPIN)和前列腺癌(CaP)细胞核形态学分析中的应用。使用自动图像分析系统得出的形态学特征可能比手工系统更客观和可重复性,手工系统需要人类从组织学图像中分割细胞核。研究设计:使用自动和手动系统独立分析苏木精-伊红染色前列腺组织微阵列切片的图像。研究了平均光密度(MOD)、核面积(NA)和核圆度因子(NRF)等形态学特征。区分组织类型的能力使用形态学特征衍生自一个自动和手动系统进行了比较。结果:17例良性前列腺增生(BPH), 4例HGPIN, 8例侵袭性前列腺增生(CaP)。在多变量模型中,手动系统对BPH和HGPIN的区分效果较好(p < 0.0001),而自动化系统对BPH和CaP的区分效果较好(p = 0.01)。手动系统使用NA (p < 0.0001)和MOD (p < 0.0001)区分BPH和HGPIN较好,而自动系统使用MOD (p < 0.0001)和NRF (p = 0.004)区分BPH和CaP较好。结论:自动化图像分析所需的人力最少,优于手动系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Manual and automated systems in the analysis of images from prostate tissue microarray cores.

Objective: To compare manual and automated image analysis systems in morphologic analysis of nuclei from benign prostate, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostate cancer (CaP). Morphologic features derived using automated image analysis systems may be more objective and reproducible than manual systems, which require humans to segment nuclei from histologic images.

Study design: Images of hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections of prostate tissue microarray were analyzed independently using the automated and manual systems. Mean optical density (MOD), nuclear area (NA), and nuclear roundness factor (NRF) were the morphologic features studied. The ability to differentiate between tissue types using morphologic features derived from an automated and a manual system was compared.

Results: Nuclei from 17 benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), 4 HGPIN, and 8 aggressive CaP were analyzed. The manual system distinguished better between BPH and HGPIN (p < 0.0001), whereas the automated system distinguished better between BPH and CaP (p = 0.01) in multivariate models. The manual system distinguished better BPH and HGPIN using NA (p < 0.0001) and MOD (p < 0.0001), whereas the automated system distinguished better BPH and CaP using MOD (p < 0.0001) and NRF (p = 0.004).

Conclusion: The minimal human effort required for automated image analysis makes it superior to the manual system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信